logo Sign In

Star Wars GOUT in HD using super resolution algorithm (* unfinished project *) — Page 39

Author
Time

Yes, you never know when your system crashes or something...

Author
Time

Hay there. I have a question.

Will the methods that you are using on the GOUT

work on other SD Materials?

Like old TV shows shot on SD video?

Or old 90s cartoons that are only mastered in SD?

Or on old Doctor who kinescop scans?

Author
Time

red5-626 said:

Hay there. I have a question.

Will the methods that you are using on the GOUT

work on other SD Materials?

Like old TV shows shot on SD video?

Or old 90s cartoons that are only mastered in SD?

Or on old Doctor who kinescop scans?

Somehow I doubt something shot on SD video, or a kinescope scan of any kind (remember that kinoscopes are basically a film camera pointed at a specialized tv monitor, at best having whatever the native resolution of the tv is) will have much improvement via super resolution. As for old 90s cartoons that are only mastered in SD, it depends on whether the editing pipeline had film involved or if it went straight from drawings to tape. And as for Doctor Who kinescopes, note that Doctor Who, as well as most BBC shows from that time period, used a mixture of tape for studio scenes and film for outdoor scenes. Considering that All of the Hartnell and the earlier half of the Troughton serials were recorded in LD resolution, even if they used filmed material, I doubt you'd be able to get detail from a LD source. As for the later half of Troughton as well as the Pertwee serials where the best source is kinescope, you might be able to use super resolution on the filmed scenes, assuming they don't exist separately (most likely in the case of Pertwee).

I wanted to post this earlier, but the outage happened. At least I got it off my chest xD.

Nobody sang The Bunny Song in years…

Author
Time
 (Edited)

And this is what I was wanting to post...

https://i.imgur.com/D7CrdII.jpg

That's from my render or SR-v10, and there are many other examples of chroma-bleeding. Did you correct this in later versions of the script DrDre?

On the topic of telerecordings (/kinescope), I've never heard the term "low definition" applied to 405 and 625 line television. Especially not 625-line. I'm pretty sure you just call 405-line standard definition. Telerecordings reduced the 50i source to 25p by throwing away every other field, and recording it onto film. As the source however was videotape, it never existed in a higher resolution than what's available on the telerecording - it simply had the other fields as well - and you can't recover missing field information from existing fields.

I don't think you can get much out of such a source - the 16mm film doesn't reproduce the exact line-pattern of the source for a start, so you're working at a disadvantage in that you have a source that higher resolution than the material it contains, whereas SR is designed to work with a source that's lower resolution than the original material. Hope that makes sense.

[ Scanning stuff since 2015 ]

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I think the SD question has been answered :-). I use QTGMC to further enhance the SR output. I will check whether it helps to correct the chroma bleeding. If not we'll just have to come up with a solution. 

Author
Time

Ah, well there's more than one way to do it, but one possible solution is to feed the SR part of your script just the luma, and use an alternate up-scaling method for the chroma.

[ Scanning stuff since 2015 ]

Author
Time
 (Edited)

RU.08 said:

On the topic of telerecordings (/kinescope), I've never heard the term "low definition" applied to 405 and 625 line television. Especially not 625-line. I'm pretty sure you just call 405-line standard definition.

Sorry. I meant to say that 625-line was SD and 405 was LD.

RU.08 said:

...you can't recover missing field information from existing fields.

Then how does VidFIRE work?

Nobody sang The Bunny Song in years…

Author
Time

VidFire recreates the missing fields. It doesn't "recover them" it makes new ones. Once a videotape is telerecorded onto film the missing fields are gone. You can actually use VidFire to "recreate" "missing" fields from material that originated on film and was never on videotape, if you wanted to. Which isn't to say it's bad technology at all, just that it is what it is. :)

[ Scanning stuff since 2015 ]

Author
Time
 (Edited)

OK thanks for the answer, I was just curious. Too bad it would not really help much.

Watching SD content is getting harder. You can't buy a new SD TV anymore.

I have a 32” 720P LCD that I can get SD to look good on if I tweak the settings just right and sit far enough away from it. But if 4K becomes standard I am not sure how bad SD will look on it.

wait hold on

"VidFire recreates the missing fields. It doesn't "recover them"

can you create fields that never existed

Author
Time

OK thanks for the answer, I was just curious. Too bad it would not really help much.

Every reply is only an (educated) guess. Noone actually tried it. You have (or you'll have) the script. Try it yourself before you give up.

But if 4K becomes standard I am not sure how bad SD will look on it.

Just as bad as it looks on HD, not worse.

Author
Time

Depends on the TV brand as well. No-name brands will always look much worse than the top brands.

[ Scanning stuff since 2015 ]

Author
Time

Valeyard: do you know if there is an avisynth script available that does the equivalent of vidfire? Would be curious to try it on the underwater menace 2 episode now that the DVD is cancelled. Have a fairly decent quality copy of it.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yep, it's not complicated. Something like...

even=last
odd=eedi2().separatefields().selectodd().FrameDoubleFunction().selectodd()
interleave(even,odd).weave()

All you need is a frame interpolation function to double the framerate and return the "new" frames, I'm sure you could fine one through google. edit... you could probably use this one: http://compression.ru/video/frame_rate_conversion/index_en_msu.html

[ Scanning stuff since 2015 ]

Author
Time

You sir have saved star wars! Will these be available in a size small enough to burn to a dvd or blu ray?

Author
Time

I'm a little new to this whole thing :/ Could someone explain in simple terms what SRV is if it's not too much trouble?

Author
Time

EwokinOnSunshine said:

I'm a little new to this whole thing :/ Could someone explain in simple terms what SRV is if it's not too much trouble?

Super Resolution is able to find the detail that is hidden by the low resolution. It combines pixels that are from different frames to form a sharp image. Check the Wikipedia page for a actual scientific breakdown. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superresolution

Author
Time

Ahh yeah i got that just didn't know what SRV would stand for. Thanks

Author
Time

SRV = super resolution version

Author
Time

Damn good guitar player...

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas

<span> </span>

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I apologize, I thought you were looking for an explanation on what SR does. Sorry about that :P

Author
Time

Just curious for an update.  How far along is the encode?

Author
Time

Going slowly sadly... 30,000 frames are finished, so 110,000 to go.