If he released it as a "preview" this would have been no issue at all. But when he posts on places where people release good quality fanedits, he will be compared to them. And rightfully so.
This very faneditor here has a long history...
started with selling fanedits, claiming that the works of others were made by him, releasing unfinished bad quality works over and over again and always making big words about it, like he did this time.
Now you can of course attack me, because I am so mean and criticize poor vengeance for another crappy release, but you can also may dig a bit and get informed where this reaction might come from.
I made my comments as point of principle.
If what you say about this editor is true (and he/she/they attempted in the past to make money out of piracy) that should have been entered into your post to flesh out your reasons for taking the tone that you chose.
It's unreasonable to expect everyone who posts on this forum to know the full history of everyone else who posts here, we do all have lives beyond this organ.
Anything we post on here is free to be countered, counter-countered and counter-counter-countered by anyone who reads it and taken in isolation your previous post regarding this project (which I have yet to see so I can't comment on it) did come across as I previously described it "poopy".
If the 'poopy hat' doesn't fit, you are well within your rights not to put the article on but if the aspect ratio is the one thing you really can't stand about this edit, show the chap how it should be done (don't try to make money off it) and take a well deserved bow. I always applaud a job well done.