- Time
- Post link
I thought it was the Prometheus trailer with the whoooahh noises taken off.
timdiggerm said:
FanFiltration said:Because films have to appeal to a broader audience than the tv show. People care more about Earth than they do about other planets.
I want to know why it's called "Star Trek", yet most of the films take place around Earth. Let's get out into deep space! You know, that place where no one has gone before. Generations & Insurrection seem to be the only two films in the franchise that do not include any Earth bound segments. And that is excluding the Earth holodeck scene in Generations.
http://twister111.tumblr.com
Previous Signature preservation link
The poster on the official website has animated flames and falling debris. Very cool.
Where were you in '77?
You know guys, I was just being sarcastic. :P
“First feel fear, then get angry. Then go with your life into the fight.” - Bill Mollison
This probably won't be up very long...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diP-o_JxysA
Holy...!
Where were you in '77?
SilverWook said:
This probably won't be up very long...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diP-o_JxysA
Holy...!
That looks awesome!
<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>
Awesome!
“Grow up. These are my Disney's movies, not yours.”
The japanese trailer has some more footage.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrHlQUXFzfw
I am so excited. I'm squeeing like a fangirl.
<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>
Me too. ;)
Are my eyes playing tricks on me, or does that look like a TOS style starship making a water landing?
Shall we speculate on who the blonde is? Carol Marcus? Janice Rand? Dr. Dehner?
Where were you in '77?
It could be Nurse Chapel.
It might be a TOS style ship. You can't really tell. It might be the Enterprise though.
<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>
If it's Chapel, and she's still into guys with pointy ears, there could be an even bigger fight scene in the movie. ;)
Where were you in '77?
Two Hollywood trends in one image. ;)
“Grow up. These are my Disney's movies, not yours.”
I'm more convinced it's Garth now.
Where were you in '77?
georgec said:
Two Hollywood trends in one image. ;)
I knew there was something the irritated me about that shot! Damn Orange and Teal!
SilverWook said:
I'm more convinced it's Garth now.
I think it might be Garth too.
<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>
Not sure what's up w/ the extra shot in the Japanese trailer. I mean it's obviously a WoK homage/ref, but we know nothing else.
Also, did anyone else realize that this trailer manages to tell us nothing new?
I feel that the Gary Mitchel thing was a red herring. For a film with so much flair, Gary Mitchel is a rather bland name for a heavy. I just can't see it. But I must say Mr. Cucumberpatch looks a formidable villain for this Kirk.
“First feel fear, then get angry. Then go with your life into the fight.” - Bill Mollison
Wasn't that the Batman trailer?
Keep Circulating the Tapes.
END OF LINE
(It hasn’t happened yet)
I thought it was the Prometheus trailer with the whoooahh noises taken off.
As someone who didn't really watch much ST growing up (occasionally on tv), do the harder core ST fans dislike what Abrams is doing because he doesn't have as much of the more cerebral sci-fi discussion/commentary?
I think Abrams did a good job on the first one, and the alternate universe thing allows him to leave every preexisting thing in the myths intact. But his works seem less like ST movies and more like action movies set in the ST universe. And I don't mean that in a negative way.
Just some thoughts I had. Someone let me know if this seems reasonable or if I sound stupid.
“Grow up. These are my Disney's movies, not yours.”
No, it's totally reasonable. There's plenty of outcry among Trek fans about this.
Yea I tend to pick up on those discussions here and there, but overall the Trek fans do seem to enjoy his movies, albeit with reservations about the lack of, for want of a better word, intelligent commentary.
“Grow up. These are my Disney's movies, not yours.”
georgec said:
As someone who didn't really watch much ST growing up (occasionally on tv), do the harder core ST fans dislike what Abrams is doing because he doesn't have as much of the more cerebral sci-fi discussion/commentary?
I think Abrams did a good job on the first one, and the alternate universe thing allows him to leave every preexisting thing in the myths intact. But his works seem less like ST movies and more like action movies set in the ST universe. And I don't mean that in a negative way.
Just some thoughts I had. Someone let me know if this seems reasonable or if I sound stupid.
I'm a pretty hardcore fan of Trek, and I loved the film. I can understand where a lot of other fans are coming from though when they say they don't like it...
Except for the ones that don't like it simply because it's popular with the general public. Those guys are dumb.
<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>
I liked the first film because I expected it to sort of be a one-off in order to draw up interest and then the following would be more of a return to form. I guess not. This still looks like it could be interesting but I'm just sick of action movies. They have to be really something special for me to not just be dragged to go see them.
Also... seriously? A lens flare when they show his name? He must be very self-aware or something.
A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em
No generic trailer has ever been more generic than that one.
Keep Circulating the Tapes.
END OF LINE
(It hasn’t happened yet)
Easy to forget Gene Roddenberry couldn't sell the first pilot episode, "The Cage" because NBC suits thought it was "too cerebral".
NBC was still impressed enough that they made the unusual decision of ordering a second pilot, "Where No Man Has Gone Before", (the one with Mitchell) which Gene made sure was more action oriented.
Where were you in '77?
timdiggerm said:
Not sure what's up w/ the extra shot in the Japanese trailer. I mean it's obviously a WoK homage/ref, but we know nothing else.
The scenes fade in & out slower in the Japanese version, showing slightly more footage, aswell.
And I made a quick little comparison video for you to drool over. ;)
Star Wars Episode XXX: Erica Strikes Back
If you want Nice, go to France