logo Sign In

Star Trek Into Darkness Full Spoiler Discussion — Page 2

Author
Time
 (Edited)

This has more to do with the comic tie-in than the movie itself but....WHY WAS MUDD A BAJORAN LADY???? I mean, April mentions her father being just as bad as her so this is probably his kid but....that really felt rebooty and not alternate timeliney. Though that is a fun explanation for his earring. =P

So, the whole film and comics being tied together seems to be out the airlock. What with the number of the deaths in the comic and yet Kirk claiming he hasn't lost anyone during his time in command.

Secondly, and most weirdly was the Gorn. They were just introduced in the game as intergalactic baddies and yet here in the film Bones claims he once performed a caesarean section on one. 005, was that in the game? If not, what the heck?!?

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Yes, but Kirk Sr. might have left some sort of recording made before his untimely death. (Maybe something Kirk's mom only recently gave to him?) It's been done in Trek before...

 

It was good that the events of the last movie cast a shadow on the plot. With Kirk and company finally off on the five year mission, I wonder if the aftermath of yet another rogue Starfleet admiral actions will cast it's own shadow.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

So I just stumbled upon an interview with Lindelof (BLECH) that is filled with interesting things:

If you were standing in space at a spot where a ship just zapped off from, is there something we can do, considering it is 6 months after the last movie, that can show us that there are new technologies at play? 

There definitely are changes to the old school technology, but that make sense in a modern context. The first that comes to mind is the scene where Scotty and Keenser are at the bar and Kirk is in orbit around Kronos. Kirk picks up his communicator and basically calls him as if it were a cell phone. This, you know, wasn't exactly how it was done before, but, to be fair, when those original shows and films were made we didn't have our cell phones and the current ease of contact. That move makes sense to a modern audience.

LINDELOF: What happened in that case, actually, is Kirk is walking down the hallway and he says to Uhura “will you find Mr. Scott and patch him through to my communicator” and she says “right away, Captain.” So then you cut to the other scene. But when we were editing we realized that the way you want to introduce Scotty is to cut to San Francisco, find him in the bar, and then have Kirk call him. The audience has somewhat forgotten that he left the ship – by having Kirk announce “track him down” it takes away from the fun of the storytelling. So we lost that bit not fully aware that this was a significant change from canon. But that's the explanation for it.

Can you confirm that the creatures we see with Kirk during his off-hours on Earth are Caitians?

LINDELOF: You mean the women with the tails?

Yes, this is the species that Lt. M'Ress was, from The Animated Series.

LINDELOF: Yes, we can confirm this.

He's so full of bull.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

I don't think they watched TAS. Or TVH...

 

Even the triple breasted cat dancer in TFF looks more feline.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Saw it last night. 

It didn't exactly get me excited for EP VII.  My only relief is that Orci won't have any involvement with Star Wars, because this script was just a complete mess.  I had to go home and watch WOK just to get the bad taste out of my mouth. 

 

 

“In the future it will become even easier for old negatives to become lost and be “replaced” by new altered negatives. This would be a great loss to our society. Our cultural history must not be allowed to be rewritten.” - George Lucas

Author
Time

Tried watching it. Doesn't do anything for me. ;)

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Try turning on the stove first.

“Grow up. These are my Disney's movies, not yours.”

Author
Time

Cobra Kai said:

My only relief is that Orci won't have any involvement with Star Wars, because this script was just a complete mess.

What's this about Orci? I thought it was just Lindelof we have to watch out for.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

^ Sarcasm?

Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman have been collaborating on shitty scripts together for ages. From the awful Hercules and Xenia television series to many of the big crappy blockbusters that his cinemas in recent years. You have them to thank for the scripts of such wonderful films as The Island, all three Transformer films, both Star Treks, and Cowboy's and Aliens. They are Hollywood's go to guys for fluffy action flicks where the dialogue doesn't really matter in the least. Lindeloff is probably the most talented of the three.

Author
Time

CP3S said:

^ Sarcasm?

Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman have been collaborating on shitty scripts together for ages. From the awful Hercules and Xenia television series to many of the big crappy blockbusters that his cinemas in recent years. You have them to thank for the scripts of such wonderful films as The Island, all three Transformer films, both Star Treks, and Cowboy's and Aliens. They are Hollywood's go to guys for fluffy action flicks where the dialogue doesn't really matter in the least. Lindeloff is probably the most talented of the three.

And that's still not even a compliment to Lindelof, LOL.

I agree, though. Those three are all awful writers. Their only major critical success in film is the ST movies, and that's obviously JJ's direction elevating what are pretty generic scripts.

“Grow up. These are my Disney's movies, not yours.”

Author
Time

I have to say, Lindelof really did reuse the ending of Lost in this film.

I'm not sure how they had time to get all those cryotubes out of the torpedoes.

I'm not sure how a torpedo would work when most of it seemed to be taken up by a cryotube.

The TWOK parallels became too heavy. The scream was really dumb.

Why couldn't they just use some other superman's blood to heal Kirk? Yes, Spock needs to catch Khan, but it doesn't seem like "the only way to save Kirk".

Otherwise, I liked it.

ROTJ Storyboard Reconstruction Project

Author
Time

Lindelof and Abrams are not in Hollywood to tell a story, they are there to manipulate audiences in order to make money off a broken system. It's like how they wasted 6 years of everyone's lives with LOST and the cynical exercises of the last few years (Super 8, Prometheus). Only in a world where the bar has been so lowered in American cinema can these people be successful in their manipulation.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Just saw it yesterday. No offense, but you guys never fail to surprise me with your cynicism and apparent inability to enjoy things for what they are. I absolutely LOVED this film. Possibly my favorite Trek movie of all time.

The rumors have been speculating a Khanbermatch for some time now, and going into the movie I really put it at the back of my mind because I didn't want it to happen. Not because I didn't like Khan, on the contrary I love Wrath of Khan as much as the next guy. But, I felt Khan was well and covered between Space Seed and WOK. 

However, when he showed up here, it was clear from the reveal that this was new ground. And it all was. My main worry when the Khan rumors were circulating was that they were going to just retread WOK. But this felt wholly original. Really everything he did here was new. That made me happy, and it made me okay that they didn't do more with him because I really didn't feel they needed to, or should, tread ground that had already been very well trodden. Of course I'll admit that making him Khan and not one of the others wasn't entirely necessary, and getting over the fact that Cumbermatch looked nothing like Montalban took a bit. (Speaking of unnecessary: the Nimoy cameo.)

As for the other shout outs to WOK, I thought they were well placed and properly executed, and just fresh enough to still make me happy. Or sad in the case of Kirk's death. Yeah, I'll admit it. I cried. (Though I have to say Spock yelling "KHAAAAAN" in the middle of my crying spell killed it a bit, but I'll probably be more okay with it on second viewing.)

Anyways I am beyond pumped for Trek 3, or whatever they'll call it, Return of the Trek or some shit. Should be amazing, and, if they keep up the quality, this will easily be one of the greatest film trilogies ever.

 

Author
Time

Abrams has no respect for what makes Star Trek the franchise it was, he just wants to make marketable action films and nothing more. Whatever directorial style people think he has is either taken from Spielberg or bland and forgettable.

Damon Lindelof is a con man. He doesn't care about writing a good script, he just wants to fuck around with the audience and take their money in the process. People think there is something deeper to his work, but it is more shallow than a dry rain puddle. 

Author
Time

The dramatic tension of Kirk's sacrifice is slightly deflated, because the audience has already been told Khan's got magical healing blood. (Which is apparently unknown to 23rd century medicine, and none of Khan's frozen comrades seem to have.) You can see the resolution coming a light year away.

The Vengeance crashing into skyscrapers unfortunately took me out of the movie. We don't need disaster porn in Trek.

I'm not that cynical in my old age. I really really wanted to love this film. It's not as good as the last one to me. I came away from that film uplifted, and I was having the worst year of my life in 2009. The sequel made a little depressed.

Now that they got the darkness out of their system, hopefully they'll do something a little lighter and more fun. I'd love to see their take on Harry Mudd.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

I disagree about the dramatic tension being lost on Kirk's death. Even though I forgot about the tribble by the time Kirk was dying, I knew he wouldn't stay dead for long. But that didn't matter. To Kirk, and to Spock, he was dying. And he died. They were feeling some pretty strong emotions, and, because I love these characters so much, and, because the scene was so well executed, I felt those emotions with them.

I will concede that this definitely isn't as uplifting as the previous one. It's actually that very fact that's making me consider my preference towards Into Darkness. Honestly, this reminds me of my feelings toward Star Wars. I used to think ESB was the greatest, by SW just got this great feeling of hope to it. Star Trek 09's got that too. I don't know. I'll have to wait some time to see how my opinions form.

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

I'd love to see their take on Harry Mudd.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)

Isn't that supposed to Harry's daughter or something? They can ignore the comics on a whim anyway.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

if they keep up the quality, this will easily be one of the greatest film trilogies ever.

Wow! No offense, but some of you guys never fail to surprise me with how willing you are to consume and enjoy pure shit. If you enjoyed it, great. But seriously, one of the greatest film trilogies ever?

This is why Orci, Kurtzman, Abrams, and Bay are some of the hottest names as well as the go to guys in Hollywood right now. Mix some dog awful but sometimes quipy dialogue over a tried and true (and tired) plot, add pretty lights and explosions, a few pairs of tits and some hot young faces, and BAM! Hollywood magic! Enthralled audiences! Raking in money by the millions!

Ugh!

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

The Vengeance crashing into skyscrapers unfortunately took me out of the movie. We don't need disaster porn in Trek.

This part bugged me too. We made a big deal about saving the crew of the Enterprise. We made a big deal about Kirk dying. Then we crash a giant ship into a city that would have easily killed far more in number than the entire crew of the Enterprise. With the number of buildings that monstrosity of a ship plowed through, this disaster must have been like 9/11 many, many times over. Nothing about this horrible disaster is ever mentioned and we transition to a smiley happy ending because, wooo, Kirk is alive again and the crew of the Enterprise survived to go on an exciting mission of exploration. Cue cheery TOS end credit music.

I feel like Spock should be standing trial for irresponsibly destroying a giant spaceship in a way that caused it to crash land on a densely populated city.

The whole scene existed solely for the whole "Whoa! Would you look at all the pretty EXPLOSIONS and DESTRUCTION!!! WAHHH!!! YEAAH!!! WOOOOOO!!!" effect.

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Isn't that supposed to Harry's daughter or something? They can ignore the comics on a whim anyway.

There is a line mentioning her father, so that is probably the case. However, this comic mini-series was actually co-written by Roberto Orci. That being the case, I'd say it's a safe bet if they ever do have Mudd in one of the films it'll be this one.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

I think Khan was using whatever he had left to try and crash into Starfleet HQ. (Man they need to put some shields around that thing .) It's more bothersome that two starships are battling it out just past the moon, and there aren't any other ships in the system that can help the Enterprise?

Might have been better for Khan to splash down in the middle of the bay and have the obligatory fight with Spock as the wreckage of the Vengeance is sinking.

Why does Admiral Banzai  Paxton Marcus need a genetic superman from two centuries ago to design scarier ships and weapons anyway? Wouldn't kidnapping old Spock and forcing him to divulge 24th century tech make more sense? Starfleet bigwigs must know where Scotty got his transwarp beaming equations from.

Interesting that they did deal with the issue of asking old Spock for info on old adversaries.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Tobar said:

SilverWook said:

Isn't that supposed to Harry's daughter or something? They can ignore the comics on a whim anyway.

There is a line mentioning her father, so that is probably the case. However, this comic mini-series was actually co-written by Roberto Orci. That being the case, I'd say it's a safe bet if they ever do have Mudd in one of the films it'll be this one.

Is Bajor even known to the Federation in the 23rd century?

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

I disagree about the dramatic tension being lost on Kirk's death. Even though I forgot about the tribble by the time Kirk was dying, I knew he wouldn't stay dead for long. But that didn't matter. To Kirk, and to Spock, he was dying. And he died. They were feeling some pretty strong emotions, and, because I love these characters so much, and, because the scene was so well executed, I felt those emotions with them.

 

I had those emotions too. In 1982! ;)

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Tobar said:

SilverWook said:

Isn't that supposed to Harry's daughter or something? They can ignore the comics on a whim anyway.

There is a line mentioning her father, so that is probably the case. However, this comic mini-series was actually co-written by Roberto Orci. That being the case, I'd say it's a safe bet if they ever do have Mudd in one of the films it'll be this one.

Is Bajor even known to the Federation in the 23rd century?

In this filmverse they probably are considering a podunk Earth bar had Cardassian Sunrise on the menu in the last film.

Forum Moderator