logo Sign In

So, this is how the DVDs are going to look... — Page 2

Author
Time
40k jpeg's don't reflect the real quality.
Author
Time
Obi Jeewhyen and Eros are correct. These are just tiny internet jpegs. Hardly a true representation of the actual DVDs.
Forum Moderator
Author
Time
Kind of silly then for someone to comment on how "good" they look....

I love everybody. Lets all smoke some reefer and chill. Hug and kisses for everybody.

Author
Time
Well, if they've sent out copies to review then they most likely will appear on the web in no time....and I will get them there because I don't have $90ish dollars to shell out on half-baked LD transfers. Granted I imagine they will look better than the ones I have now, but I still don't wanna line GL's pockets with ha;f a paycheck in my situation.

Hey look, a bear!

Author
Time
I think this one looks good. Especially the moon.

http://img354.imageshack.us/img354/7576/03rn2.jpg
Fez: I am so excited about Star Whores.
Hyde: Fezzy, man, it's Star Wars.
Author
Time
yeah, I'd be fine if the DVD looked like that ^.

It looks better than most of the times I saw Star Wars in theaters.
Author
Time
I wouldn't say they look awful. But I think they look pretty good compared to what I was expecting.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Obi Jeewhyen
yeah, I'd be fine if the DVD looked like that ^.

It looks better than most of the times I saw Star Wars in theaters.


Really? I mean, really? You didn't notice the lack of stars on the left side of the SD? Or how about the salt and pepper noise that is most apparant
on the planet? I guess some of us look deeper at the details than others...

Also if all these screens are shitty 72 dpi crappy captures of the DVD then they all equal quality to each other. I agree that the pic abouve is one of the best presented but it goes to show that the crappy Kantina sceen is
as bad as it looks as well....



I love everybody. Lets all smoke some reefer and chill. Hug and kisses for everybody.

Author
Time
Originally posted by: Arnie.d I think this one looks good. Especially the moon.

http://img354.imageshack.us/img354/7576/03rn2.jpg


Yes this one looks somewhat better, but I don't think this is from the 1993 laserdisc master.

This is probably 'new' footage from a better source, that was inserted for the sake of the original SW crawl and starfield.






Author
Time
Originally posted by: vbangle
Also if all these screens are shitty 72 dpi crappy captures of the DVD then they all equal quality to each other.
Yes, so if you look at how shitty the menus are represented here and imagine how good they will look on the actual release, you can take that improvement factor and apply it to the other screenshots and get a pretty good idea of what the movies will look like: Not fabulous, but not terrible either.

War does not make one great.

Author
Time
It has a bit of "film look". Like that scan of an original frame Laserman??? posted and I can't find anymore.
Fez: I am so excited about Star Whores.
Hyde: Fezzy, man, it's Star Wars.
Author
Time
The menus do look a little soft because they were scaled from anamorphic 16:9 (720 x 576) to a real 16:9 aspect ratio (720 x 405). Well, at least the menus are anamorphic
Author
Time
I do have to admit that these don't look near as bad as I excpected. I think I will buy them.


Author
Time
If these are grabs from a DVD, which their precise resolution suggests, then JPEG compression should be the only quality factor to take into consideration (unless they've been analogue captured, which I doubt), but the DVD menus do look a little bit on the poor side if that's true. There's also a lot more vignetting (darkening at the edges, like the ESB menu) than there should be in the shot of the Star Destroyer over Tatooine when you compare it to various LD preservation screenshots. I have my suspicions that the images have been matted with black after resizing, if they came from a DVD capture, which seems an odd thing to do.

I also don't think the vertical resize can be entirely to blame for the menu's fuzziness.

The DVD menus do stick almost exactly to the 10% text safe area standards, just like the 2004 DVDs, if that means anything.

DE
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Moth3r
I reckon there are several ways in which I could improve on my original transfer.

What I would like to see is an objective comparison between the official version, the finished X0 project and an improved Moth3r transfer. Just think what would happen if a reputable home entertainment magazine or website was to report that the fan-created bootlegs are higher quality than the official DVD release. That's the sort of publicity our cause needs.

(Saying that, the official DVDs do seem to have an absence of dot-crawl that all laserdisc transfers suffer from to some degree.)


What are the several ways you speak of Moth3r?

“I love Darth Editous and I’m not ashamed to admit it.” ~ADigitalMan

Author
Time
Anybody able to answer the interlaced vs progressive question yet? What about telecining? It will affect the ease of an anamorphic blow-up of the film in AVISynth.

My understanding only goes so far, so I'm hoping you die-hards would know by now.
I am fluent in over six million forms of procrastination.
Author
Time
I joined this stie because I want the originals as they were made. I assumed that was what everyone else here wanted as well. Now that we are getting them on DVD all I am hearing is "not good enough". To all of you that are bitching please please please shut the fuck up.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: half full
I joined this stie because I want the originals as they were made. I assumed that was what everyone else here wanted as well. Now that we are getting them on DVD all I am hearing is "not good enough". To all of you that are bitching please please please shut the fuck up.

2006 = anamorphic transfer at least, and not really a lot to ask for...

There is no need for me to begin to touch your "shut the fuck up" comment, because that showed me the type of person you are already...
Author
Time
Half Full,

You're an idiot. Get a clue before you start popping off at the mouth. Hopefully you'll be banned by the mods SOON!
Author
Time
Oh well, these look good enough for me. Not as bad as I'd been hearing about.

I'll buy them I think, and begin work on my own somewhat De-SE DVD fan edit, assuming I can find a decent way to convert the DVDs to anamorphic without loosing too much quality.

My stance on revising fan edits.

Author
Time
These shots don't look half bad (if they're real). Please don't misunderstand me- I am outraged that my favorite films of all time are being treated like an afterthought, but since I found out about this release- I resigned myself to the idea that GL is a jerk. I was OK with my laserdiscs, so if these DVDs are only a smidge better than the LDs, I will just have to be satisfied with them......for now. But the fight still goes on........
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c229/queen1970/06.jpg
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c229/queen1970/12.jpg

Author
Time
I realize we're grasping at whatever straws we can get our eyes on for the next 18 days .... but I'll be much less cynical about quality comments once commentators have watched the actual DVDs.

Of course, it will be too late for me by then ... I will have made my purchase already. But while I'm glad for a topic to read and post about, these screen shots prove nothing ... and we'll still have to wait and see.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: vbangle

Really? I mean, really? .....I guess some of us look deeper at the details than others...

Really?....perhaps some of just choose to actually watch the film instead of constantly bitching about those details.
Forum Moderator