logo Sign In

Since when did ROTJ become less highly regarded than even Episodes II or III? — Page 5

Author
Time

I suppose he could have shot the Biker scout dead, but that would have alerted someone, and they did need the uniform for one of the rebel commandos to don. Which means there's a unconscious naked scout in the bushes somewhere.

Has that black blob on the bunker door always been there? o_O

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

To me, the biggest problem with ROTJ is the gargantuan plot holes.  In particular, the rescue plan is incomprehensible, and the emperor's plan to turn Luke makes little sense (particularly since he is telling Luke his plan).

However, it is still a really fun movie and the two new characters (Jabba and the Emperor) steal every scene they are in.  The climactic scene with Vader (sans "no") is terrifically done.  The ewoks are fine - there could certainly be creatures like that on some alien world.  I still think it's an excellent movie despite the flaws... given the direction ESB took the "saga", ROTJ was an almost perfect wrap-up IMHO.

"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars

Author
Time
 (Edited)

1990osu said:

Jaitea said:

At the closing of Empire Luke agrees to meet Lando on Tatooine, it seems to be knowledge to them & the audience that Fett is taking Solo to Jabba....so a year looking for Solo doesn't sound right.

About Jabba...people who complain about ROTJ talk badly about the Jabba part, saying the Jabba rescue takes up half the movie. 

 

That maybe true, but it is GOOD so it's worth it.  Jabba the Hutt is a GOOD character. 

 

"Ho ho ho ho".  He's like an evil Santa Claus!  This is why ROTJ is a genius movie.

I don't mind it taking up about a third of the movie.

I do mind the escape plan making no sense, the cartoonish characters (which were there long before George got his CGI scribble pen out) and the comedy torture scene, and the Sarlacc just being a toothy hole in the ground, the SE should have made it a chained up sandworm off Dune (it's too late to back off now we all know it's a Dune rip-off/loving homage in the same period as the Lynch film).

And air swim

Author
Time

Bingowings said:

It's easy to say the PT is bobbins if you think it's bobbins.

Total bobbins.

War does not make one great.

Author
Time

Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:

and the emperor's plan to turn Luke makes little sense (particularly since he is telling Luke his plan).

I think it makes sense. The point isn't to make Luke join him willingly, the point is to make him really angry and desperate so that he will kill Vader. And then he will be on the dark side whether he wants to or not.

Author
Time

^Exactly.  I can understand the dissatisfaction with the infiltration of Jabba's palace, but the Emperor's plan was executed precisely as it should have been.  The movie is imperfect, but that was among its best aspects IMO.

Author
Time

But I could see it more effective if the Emperor was describing his plot to someone else, or out loud to hiimself while meditating, and then doing his sinister smiling while Luke was falling into it.  Maybe getting so pleased that he starts uttering "good, good", maybe with Luke noticing... so Luke discovers on his own (or because of his Yoda training) that he is falling into the dark side, the Emperor's plot would have failed through Luke's ingenuity and maturity.  As it is, it is hard for me to believe that if my enemy kept telling me what I was doing wrong, that I'd keep doing it.

"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars

Author
Time

To me it did seem like a bit of a stretch that the Emperor's plan would have been close to working, I couldn't say that it was because he was telling Luke the plan or what.  For what it's worth, Luke looking at his mechanical hand then Vader's stump was a cool bit that helped sell the whole scene and I don't have a huge problem with how they played Luke's struggle.  But yeah it could have been better for sure.  At least it was way more convincing than Ep III.

But it does make it seem like the plan wasn't really perfectly orchestrated when the thing that almost brought Luke over was anger over the potential of them turning Leia.  Which neither Vader nor the Emperor knew anything about her being his sister until just then.

I probably like RotJ equally as much as Star Wars and ESB, and nostalgia does play a bit in that.  Like someone earlier said, there are lots of "goosebump" moments for me, probably more than the other 2.  Funeral pyre, Vader saving Luke, the Falcon coming out of the central Death Star core with the explosion in the background, the fleet going to light speed, Luke taking down the speeder with a lightsaber.  Those stand out to me more than the poor effects stick out.

Still, I do wish the tone overall was a bit darker and less campy.  More scenes of rebel commandos getting it done and a bit less ewoks.  And there could have been more of a sense of desperation in the end battles if some rebels died who got to say more than one line.  Like the space battle was an awesome spectacle but it felt like you're along for the ride, but not on the edge of your seat.  Even though hundreds or thousands of rebels died you didn't really feel for them.  Compared to the trench run in Star Wars, you got to know the pilots a little bit and it felt more and more hopeless when each one died.  Maybe they should have made it Wedge who was hit and crashed into the super star destroyer.  That would have had an impact.

Author
Time

They already knew from Cloud City that Luke's attachment to his friends was his small thermal exhaust port.

Finding out about Leia was a bonus for them.

I doubt if either Vader or Palpatine would plan to target the moon if they knew that Sith Apprentice Plan B was walking around down there.  

Author
Time

BmB said:

 

Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:

and the emperor's plan to turn Luke makes little sense (particularly since he is telling Luke his plan).

I think it makes sense. The point isn't to make Luke join him willingly, the point is to make him really angry and desperate so that he will kill Vader. And then he will be on the dark side whether he wants to or not.

 

Yes, I guess it makes sense as there's no temptation and no seduction, the force seems to operate on a light switch. Just get him angry and he has joined the dark side. I expected more than this simplification of the force after ESB. To me, even the little foreshadowing scene in the cave sequence in ESB had more depth than all these throne room scenes together.

This had all worked much, much better if we had actually seen any traces of conflict within Luke, but as it stands he enters the picture as the white knight already and is dead set against killing Vader, he only senses good within his father, instead Vader/Anakin is the one that is conflicted. I did enjoy these scenes but I do think they seem much better to some than they actually are because everything else we are shown is quite mediocre. The space battle is pretty, I give you that.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

People bitch and complain about the ewoks. Personally, I can see why people hated them, but to base an entire movie based on one thing is pathetic. Alot of people who complain about PM base most of the hate off of Jar Jar, even though theres much more to complain about. Episode VI is a masterpiece and II and III are just popcorn flicks.

"It's not the years honey, it's the mileage"-Indiana Jones

Author
Time

Luke being forced to stand by and watch the Rebel fleet getting slaughtered was also calculated to put pressure on him.

I've long wondered if the Ewok battle was toned down in the editing room. There's a shot in the movie where an Ewok is waving an Imperial blaster, but we never see it being used. Plus, there's unused footage from Jedi in the second Ewok tv movie that didn't show up on the Blu Ray.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

SilverWook said:

I've long wondered if the Ewok battle was toned down in the editing room.

When Ewoks Attack!

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3

Author
Time
 (Edited)

As I've argued elsewhere George seems to be a fan of all early talkie tropes, including travelogue film series like Tarzan (Chewie's fourth wall breaking yodel is illustrative).

The Ewoks are the Star Wars version of the cannibal African tribesman that nobody would be able to get away with now in much the same way that Jar-Jar is Stepin Fetchit but at least the Ewoks are so obscured by their appearance and their language that they almost get away with it.

I personally would have played against their cute appearance.

Maybe another in another reworking those teddy bears will have shark teeth.

Author
Time

I like that much better than the roadkill deer ass the prop guys used for bait. ;)

It can be hard to see in the movie, but many of the Ewok warriors had knives on their belts. In the ROTJ novel, even Wicket is described as having one.

Lucasfilm actually had some '90's Topps trading card artwork changed, to remove a knife held by an Ewok fighting a stormtrooper.

Given Lucas' early involvement with Apocalypse Now, the Ewoks could be considered a version of the natives in that film. Which makes Threepio Col. Kurtz? ;)

The fanfilm "The Invisible Enemy" is as close to vicious Ewoks as we're likely to get.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Forgive me for tooting my own horn, and I can't really take credit for it either, but the very rough ROTJ edit found in my links includes slightly tougher Ewoks, including implications that they had taken out stormtroopers.  Now the footage I used comes from SSWR's ideas (and my understanding is that he has vanished), but I think it is quite effective and could be pulled off in an edit fairly easily.

Author
Time

BmB said:

Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:

and the emperor's plan to turn Luke makes little sense (particularly since he is telling Luke his plan).

I think it makes sense. The point isn't to make Luke join him willingly, the point is to make him really angry and desperate so that he will kill Vader. And then he will be on the dark side whether he wants to or not.

 
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Luke-VS-the-Emperor-What-if-Vader-hadnt-been-there/post/401848/#TopicPost401848

I still think what I thought back then.

Basically, what is the Emperor's exit strategy from this fight?  On the surface, it seems to be very broken.  As some have said, the Emperor seems to be talking Luke out of joining the Dark Side by pushing so hard for him to join the Dark Side.  And all of this talk about how he will be his apprentice in, oh... 10 minutes seems to be very odd.

Maybe I'm trying to make a silk purse here, but if you look at it as a certain kind of reverse-reverse-psychology, it seems to work. 

If everyone told you that cigarettes were VERY ADDICTING and to never even try them, and then a cigarette salesman (I promise I'm going somewhere) told you they were VERY VERY ADDICTING and that you'd be a total addict 5 minutes after your first puff... and then he tricked you into trying one... and you realized you weren't a total addict at that point in time... wouldn't it dull your fear of becoming an adict and, perhaps, increase the likelihood that you would actually smoke cigaretters kind of casually until... YOU ARE ADDICTED. 

It kind of works, right?

Perhaps it's as bad as prequel apologistisms, but it makes sense to me.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

The word you are trying to use is addictive (what's the emoticon for smug autocratic pedant look like again?).

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Bingowings said:

(what's the emoticon for smug autocratic pedant look like again?).

I'm pretty sure it's similar to Tranny Surprise.

Author
Time

tuxmanv said:

but to base an entire movie based on one thing is pathetic. Alot of people who complain about PM base most of the hate off of Jar Jar, even though theres much more to complain about. Episode VI is a masterpiece and II and III are just popcorn flicks.

So you would base an entire movie based on several things?

Also...

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_D_Z-D2tzi14/S8TRIo4br3I/AAAAAAAACv4/Zh7_GcMlRKo/s400/ALOT.png

Also, I know many people like ROTJ, and I'm kind of a fan myself...but a masterpiece?  *eye roll*

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Bingowings said:

The word you are trying to use is addictive (what's the emoticon for smug autocratic pedant look like again?).

Oh I give up. Stupid forum software.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

msycamore said:

Yes, I guess it makes sense as there's no temptation and no seduction, the force seems to operate on a light switch. Just get him angry and he has joined the dark side. I expected more than this simplification of the force after ESB. To me, even the little foreshadowing scene in the cave sequence in ESB had more depth than all these throne room scenes together.

This had all worked much, much better if we had actually seen any traces of conflict within Luke, but as it stands he enters the picture as the white knight already and is dead set against killing Vader, he only senses good within his father, instead Vader/Anakin is the one that is conflicted. I did enjoy these scenes but I do think they seem much better to some than they actually are because everything else we are shown is quite mediocre. The space battle is pretty, I give you that.


But that scene in ESB is just a simplistic, if you kill Vader then you become Vader.

The main issue is that they never really believably get Luke all that angry. "Oh we'll turn your sister instead" and then he just flies off the handle for no apparant reason. This is where there is room for improvement.

Author
Time

BmB said:

But that scene in ESB is just a simplistic, if you kill Vader then you become Vader.

If that is what you think that little scene was about I suggest you rewatch it.

 

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

msycamore said:

BmB said:

But that scene in ESB is just a simplistic, if you kill Vader then you become Vader.

If that is what you think that little scene was about I suggest you rewatch it.

 

I always thought it was about Luke discovering that Vader is his father.

I like BmB's interpretation.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3