
- Time
- Post link
I think it would take at least three Wolfmans to beat a Frankenstein.
I think it would take at least three Wolfmans to beat a Frankenstein.
Frankenstein is just a scientist,
one Wolfman could beat him to a pulp with his arm tied behind his back.
Bingowings said:
Frankenstein is just a scientist,
A common misconception. I cite "Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein where Lou Costello clearly refers to Glenn Strange's Monster character as both "Frankie" and "Frankenstein."
Can't argue with that.
TheBoost said:
Bingowings said:
Frankenstein is just a scientist,
A common misconception. I cite "Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein where Lou Costello clearly refers to Glenn Strange's Monster character as both "Frankie" and "Frankenstein."
Yahoo Serious faces a challenge to make me laugh.
vs.
Nigel Gus
“First feel fear, then get angry. Then go with your life into the fight.” - Bill Mollison
^ One had the Burundi Wand the other did not.
TheBoost said:
I think it would take at least three Wolfmans to beat a Frankenstein.
I don't know about that. One wolfman did pretty well at holding his own against Frankenstein's Monster in "Frankenstein vs. the Wolfman".
TheBoost said:
Bingowings said:
Frankenstein is just a scientist,
A common misconception. I cite "Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein where Lou Costello clearly refers to Glenn Strange's Monster character as both "Frankie" and "Frankenstein."
Can't argue with that.
"Abott and Costell Meet Frankenstein", isn't part of the official cannon.
8 replies.
If Frankenstein can conquer "The World", then what is a little Wolfman gonna do?
“First feel fear, then get angry. Then go with your life into the fight.” - Bill Mollison
Warbler said:
TheBoost said:
I think it would take at least three Wolfmans to beat a Frankenstein.
I don't know about that. One wolfman did pretty well at holding his own against Frankenstein's Monster in "Frankenstein vs. the Wolfman".
TheBoost said:
Bingowings said:
Frankenstein is just a scientist,
A common misconception. I cite "Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein where Lou Costello clearly refers to Glenn Strange's Monster character as both "Frankie" and "Frankenstein."
"Abott and Costell Meet Frankenstein", isn't part of the official cannon.
I content that if the only other time Lugosi played Dracula isn't canon, then canon is what has the problem.
you wouldn't call this;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Count_Dracula_%281969_film%29
part of the official cannon of the Hammer series of Dracula films, would you?
12 replies.
Warbler said:
you wouldn't call this;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Count_Dracula_%281969_film%29
part of the official cannon of the Hammer series of Dracula films, would you?
Nice point, but that's not a Hammer movie.
But "Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein" has Bela as Dracula, Lon as the one and only Wolf Man, both Glenn Strange the heir apparent AND Lon Chaney Jr as Frankenstein, and of course it's BY UNIVERSAL.
If you ignore the antics of the leads, the movie makes just as much sense as House of Dracula (by which I mean little to none).
Lon Chaney Jr played the monster part of the time in "Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein"?
MC Hammer vs. Inspector Sledge Hammer.
Go!
Cushing vs. Karloff
FIGHT!
VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader
doubleKO, DuracellEnergizer and georgec vs. Humanity
DESTROY ALL HUMANS!
Warbler said:
Lon Chaney Jr played the monster part of the time in "Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein"?
Legend has it Glenn Strange broke his foot, and Lon Jr. threw on the costume for a couple shots. I've never gone scene by scene to check it out.
Bingowings said:
TheBoost said:
Bingowings said:
Frankenstein is just a scientist,
A common misconception. I cite "Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein where Lou Costello clearly refers to Glenn Strange's Monster character as both "Frankie" and "Frankenstein."
Work firewall doesn't let me see you pic, but I'll assume it's about you humbly accepting the rightness of my stance.
While we're on the (not much of a) subject, the new Lego series is like someone drilled a pipeline straight into my fourth grade imagination. My school notebook was filled with doodles that looked EXACTLY like this.
I wish my boy was old enough for Legos.
Or that you were younger than 15?
TV's Frink said:
Or that you were younger than 15?
I guess, but I don't want to turn my wife into a child molester.
TV's Frink said:
Or that you were younger than 15 and old than 8?
fixed.