logo Sign In

SW Tech: Why is Darth Vader scarred?

Author
Time

Star Wars is supposed to take place in the past, but has highly advanced technology. Luke gets his face messed up by the wampa at the beginning of ESB, but the rebels put him in, what looks like, a liquid rejuvenation chamber. Afterwards he looks healed, with left over bruises, marks, or stitches. Later, he gets his hand cut off, but he gets a flesh-covered, mechanical replacement that, from the outside, is undetectable.

Why is Anakin’s scarring permanent but not Luke’s? I read that at one point, Vader’s origin was going to include him falling into something radioactive, which might explain any attempts to fix his face/body not lasting very long. But wouldn’t burning be reparable in the SW universe?

Author
Time

He didn’t just get a burn, he was on fucking fire. His clothes seared to his skin. If you look at him in Jedi, he looks really good for a burn victim.

It seems like people are really embracing the new characters. In fact, the big question people ask me now about Star Wars is, “Are Finn and Poe gay lovers?” And really how the f*ck would I know? My second husband left me for a man, so my gaydar isn’t exactly what you’d call Death Star level quality. ----Carrie Fisher

Author
Time

I think one of the old-EU explanations was that the Emperor purposely didn’t allow Vader to be fully healed so that he would always carry the pain and scars of his failure in order to better keep him under his heel.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

lovelikewinter said:

He didn’t just get a burn, he was on fucking fire. His clothes seared to his skin. If you look at him in Jedi, he looks really good for a burn victim.

So, we’re supposed to assume that his appearance in ROTJ represents the physical damages he incurred prior to the mask, or that he naturally healed very slowly from those injuries, or that his body/face took a long time to get repaired through medical means.

I think Lucas intended the first, because their was nothing to imply that he was trying to get his face fixed in the previous films, and probably he didn’t want Vader’s countenance to look too gruesome for the younger demographic he was aiming for (see The Ewoks).

Yes, he was on fire, so you’d think that the Emperor would have put him in some kind of therapy/rehabilitative/medical procedure, or something. I think the tech seen in SW would mandate that. Instead, he’s instantly put into the robotic suit. You’d think he’d be put on some kind of respiratory system, while trying to at least repair SOME of his injuries. Which is why I don’t think it makes sense with what we know of Star Wars.
They can recreate the look of Luke’s hand, seamlessly, when it wasn’t on fire, it was completely gone, but Vader’s charred body right away is put into a suit.

Author
Time

Tyrphanax said:

I think one of the old-EU explanations was that the Emperor purposely didn’t allow Vader to be fully healed so that he would always carry the pain and scars of his failure in order to better keep him under his heel.

I could see that. He’s completely servile to the Emperor in the originals. However, it really takes away from the character if he has the ability to regain his old appearance, but his boss is like, “No, pretty much destroyed the Jedi, ensured my domination of the galaxy, but you failed to kill Obi-Wan. I’m withholding plastic surgery from you.” I’d like to think the reason he holds a grudge towards Obi-Wan, is because he suffered irreparable damage from him, turning him into a monster. Even if his wife had still been alive, he’s disfigured and trapped in a walking respiratory device.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

To be honest I wish this had been how they portrayed Vader in ROTJ. I personally don’t think it would have distracted the audience from the emotional moments in that scene after the initial shock of seeing Vader’s face as there is enough time for that to take the visual in before he and Luke start talking again. It even would sync up better with how he was injured in ROTS.

EDIT:

Also Vader probably shouldn’t have a nose either.

Author
Time

Tyrphanax said:

I think one of the old-EU explanations was that the Emperor purposely didn’t allow Vader to be fully healed so that he would always carry the pain and scars of his failure in order to better keep him under his heel.

Which would make sense – especially since Palpatine does have access to cloning technology, and could easily replace Anakin’s damaged/lost body parts with cloned replacements if that’s what he really wanted to do.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Voss Caltrez said:

They can recreate the look of Luke’s hand, seamlessly, when it wasn’t on fire, it was completely gone, but Vader’s charred body right away is put into a suit.

Well, if Vader’s head was cut off, I’m pretty sure they could replace it seamlessly with a robotic head and artificial skin, but healing is completely different than recreating.
There is only so much even super-advanced space technology can do. When Luke comes out of the Bacta tank, he still has some injuries that need to heal naturally, maybe Vader’s injuries are just too severe.
And if you take the prequels into account, women still die in child birth, so the Star Wars medical equipment doesn’t seem as advanced anymore.

Ceci n’est pas une signature.

Author
Time

When Anakin had the vision of her dying in child birth, not one time did he think why this would happen in the first place. This leads to the conclusion that “dying in child birth” just happens and there is nothing medicine can do about it, otherwise, she could have just went to a doctor to get herself checked.

Ceci n’est pas une signature.

Author
Time

Medicine in the SW Universe is shit. They can zip around the galaxy at FTL speeds and create planet-blasting superweapons, but they can’t keep women from dying in childbirth of a broken heart or slow down the human aging process.

Author
Time

They can slow it down, by freezing them in carbonite.

Ceci n’est pas une signature.

Author
Time

Voss Caltrez said:

Tyrphanax said:

I think one of the old-EU explanations was that the Emperor purposely didn’t allow Vader to be fully healed so that he would always carry the pain and scars of his failure in order to better keep him under his heel.

I could see that. He’s completely servile to the Emperor in the originals. However, it really takes away from the character if he has the ability to regain his old appearance, but his boss is like, “No, pretty much destroyed the Jedi, ensured my domination of the galaxy, but you failed to kill Obi-Wan. I’m withholding plastic surgery from you.” I’d like to think the reason he holds a grudge towards Obi-Wan, is because he suffered irreparable damage from him, turning him into a monster. Even if his wife had still been alive, he’s disfigured and trapped in a walking respiratory device.

So if that whole suit is a respitory device, why is it so big? Remember in the prequels they stick something the size3 of a pencil in their mouths and they are able to breathe underwater. Did they cheap out and buy Darth a old one or something?

Author
Time

Respiratory devices are different. You need a pump often because the problem is often also physical ability to breath, not just need for more concentrated oxygen.

TV’s Frink said:

I would put this in my sig if I weren’t so lazy.

Author
Time

I totally misread the name of this thread the other day and thought it was asking why Darth Vader was scared. Now every time I see it I misread it even though I know what it’s about.

Author
Time

I think of it as a fantasy/sci-fi version of the iron lung, if that makes any sense.

.

Author
Time

suspiciouscoffee said:

I think of it as a fantasy/sci-fi version of the iron lung, if that makes any sense.

Exactly. It’s actually pretty impressive that he’s walking around in a hermetically-sealed iron lung that controls most of his bodily functions and it all fits inside a bodysuit and a little box.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)