STAR WARS: EP V "REVISITED EDITION"ADYWAN - 12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW — Page 450

Where is ImpFighter when i need him :P

First pic. That shit that is next to vader has no purpose. We dont see it again. Or not. Correct me

Second pic the carbon chambers or where the duel begun it should be visible in some shots from behind.

And:

-Angel

The angel is wrong, you wouldnt see that behind Vader in that shot

It oughtn't to be impossible to do both. I think Vader might even be more menacing with the big thing behind him.

Why can't we delete superfluous posts?

vaderios said:

Where is ImpFighter when i need him :P

First pic. That shit that is next to vader has no purpose. We dont see it again. Or not. Correct me

Second pic the carbon chambers or where the duel begun it should be visible in some shots from behind.

And:

 

-Angel

What I like about the Vader shot with the building behind him is that it gives off a better contrast between Vader's black suit and the background. I think its very nice actually, as now the original shot appears flat in comparison. But if it is not accurate to have it there, then it wouldn't be a necessary change.

RoccondilRinon said:

Why can't we delete superfluous posts?

Cuz there's no delete function here, as you may have noticed. Haha. ;)

Seriously, it would be nice sometimes if there was, especially for those bizarre incidences involving double, triple or even quadruple posts. Yes, I've seen four of the same post in a row before.

^ Didn't I end up with a quintuple post awhile back? :-)

Vaderios, nice mockups, as usual.  However in pic 1, as AxiaEuxine pointed out, the structure would not be visible behind Vader from that angle (I think it would be off to the left).

As for pic 2... I feel like I'm the only person on the forum who doesn't see any continuity issues with the vane/duel sequence.  I always imaged the underbelly of Cloud City to be pretty big, and that the duel could occur anywhere within its bowels.  In pic 2, then, is there any reason to believe that that balcony is part of the vane-like structure?  Could Luke not have been somehere else (i.e., higher up or below) that structure on the balcony, only to resume the duel in a different physical location?

Edit: sorry, by "pic 1" I meant the 2nd one (the one with the structure behind Vader), and by "pic 2" I meant the last/3rd pic (the long shot of the entire structure in the shaft).

corellian77 said:

 However in pic 1, as AxiaEuxine pointed out, the structure would not be visible behind Vader from that angle (I think it would be off to the left).

Maybe i put the building in the wrong place and perespective. Im sure is tall enough that a part of it can be visible.

After all its the end of the road so we can see its beginning.

Or maybe im wrong. Im just throwing ideas. Ady will have the final word.

Well ady: The big cylinder room should be a cylinder as we see it in the next shots even with wrong curvature...

So in the pic 2 tell me if that is wrong or right.

Pic 1 shows that if the building is visible. The call is up to you

-Angel

The perspective may be wrong as vader may be facing at a different angle for us to see the station behind him.I am unsure though.I do really like the change in perspective that the station behind vader gives and as said there is a starker contrast visible too.

Going back to ESB:R Covers and Posters, here's the logo I created for the film (small, compressed, and blue):

If anyone wants to use this for their project, feel free.

You can get the full .psd file in white (600x488, 300 dpi) with a transparent background here:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=1QQSC2TS and it's only ~180k in size.

Enjoy!

vaderios said:

Where is ImpFighter when i need him :P

First pic. That shit that is next to vader has no purpose. We dont see it again. Or not. Correct me

Second pic the carbon chambers or where the duel begun it should be visible in some shots from behind.

And:

 

-Angel

Pic 1 - what you are seeing is the railing for the stairs on the gantry where falls over. This shot was obviously taken from earlier on in the sequence. I have removed the railing in this shot.

Pic 2 - the angle this shot is taken would make the structure off left side of the screen so wouldn't be visible

Pic 3 -  I see what you mean here. i will look into fixing that

Bingowings said:

adywan said:

Is it just me or are all the pics hosetd by imageshack not showing?

i can't see any of your pics Vaderios, so i can't comment yet

They are showing up fine here Ady.

 

yeh, they just started showing up after i wrote that. must have been a glitch over at imageshack because i couldn't't access their site for a while too

Problem with the image hosting Ady?...

-Angel

Could someone explain to me the continuity problem with the saber duel and the inconsistencies presented by the physical environments?  I'm really not getting this.

"I'm from Canada... they think I'm slow, eh."

adywan said:

Pic 3 -  I see what you mean here. i will look into fixing that

I was wrong here... this should not look like this and the hole in the back is in the wrong place.

*See above*

-Angel

vaderios said:

adywan said:

Pic 3 -  I see what you mean here. i will look into fixing that

I was wrong here... this should not look like this and the hole in the back is in the wrong place.

I will edit my post in a minute with a test mockup.

 

*             *               *

 

-Angel

 

Just as I finally figured out what it all meant, you're changing it?!

Ripplin said:

dark_jedi said:

which would crush the snow speeder even MORE when the weight of the AT-AT shifted onto that foot when the others start to move.

Now that is EXACTLY how I feel,whether it is putting "all" its weight on it or not,it is going to flatten,and in my opinion,it is putting all its weight on it,it is walking forward isn't it?

If the scene were to continue on, it would get more crushed as it started walking again, but it's pretty stationary at the time we see. It comes down and stays there motionless for a second or two. (it would be funny if it started rotating right and left, like it's squishing a bug) That leg would be slightly bent and the rest would be more or less straight.

 

That's something else; while the AT-ATs weren't exactly fast, the legs (and feet) still moved at a regular steady pace.  So if you were to make the "foot stomp" scene consistent with the farther shots of AT-ATs moving, the upper part should be slowly swinging from right to left to indicate the upper leg moving while the other legs were picking up off the ground and moving forward.  In this case, the upper area would slowly swing to the left, as we would see the foot not just crush more into the snow speeder with the initial impact, but drive further down into it in the later part of the shot (while Luke is on the ground) - granted, it is literally a second, but it would be nice/cool to see the close-up foot match the movement of the feet in the overall AT-AT body shots.

What you see in the movie is simply due to the limitations of 1980 FX work (they probably literally dropped the foot prop onto the snow speeder, which means the upper area where the leg connected to the foot probably didn't have anything to pivot with)

Ripplin said:

RoccondilRinon said:

Why can't we delete superfluous posts?

Cuz there's no delete function here, as you may have noticed. Haha. ;)

Actually, you can.  The header will still exist, but anyone can go back and use the "edit" feature and simply scroll your mouse over the repeated text, highlight and delete.  Again, you would still have a space there, but it would be a 2 or 3 line empty space as opposed to a big, huge block of repeated text(s) and images.

Case in point: I just deleted half of the quoted message above.

doubleofive said:

Just as I finally figured out what it all meant, you're changing it?!

Yes. there is actually the bottom of the building and the wings are visible from this angle. (*wings* you can spot them in the establishing shot!)

Just to get the idea. there are still some problems i spot.

-Angel

Remove that from the establishing shot. It feels more dangerous if it is just luke hanging on to the railing with nothing under him but death LOL.

EyeShotFirst said:

Remove that from the establishing shot. It feels more dangerous if it is just luke hanging on to the railing with nothing under him but death LOL.

It feels like in Titanic that the poor passengers hit on the propellers when they jumped!

removal instead of adding is a good idea tho...

i hope ady will NOT make a prop and for that :D

-Angel