rpvee said:
It's hard to feel the "sense" of a movie when there are a lot of rough cuts.
You are talking like all of "my movie" is roughly cut...There is sometimes this problem...but only in critical sequences...it doesn't affect the "sense" of the film.
This is not because at few moments, some little things go quick that the film becomes incomprehensible.
I very well understood what you are talking about but I am trying to explain that there are more shocking rough cut than mine in the original movie itself.
Look again at this example : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky60ZJsjjTI
Mace turn twice on himself (180 %) ! it's really really rough...
I work frame by frame, nothing is left randomly...you said earlier : "you really, I guess, just need to work on your sense of timing. A lot of the cuts are just really, really rough" but it's irrevelant given that I work with a very very limited stuff.
Give me a camera, let me shoot this sequence from the beginning with the actors and then we can talk about my sense of timing.
I will show you someday my edit on the Lord of the rings trilogy...and you will see that there is absolutly not this kind of problems...simply because there are less things to change...much more good stuff. The edit is easier.
Unfortunately this is not possible here, ROTS need a radical cut. I can easly let things go slower but it meant keeping ugly things.
I just find you a little unfair regarding the limited stuff I am working with. You judge me on things that can't be improved (except a few fancy cuts, but here too, I'm not blind, I know why I am doing this..and it's not really important, It doesn't ruin the movie)
In front of two defects, I always choose the slightest. This is a good example. What is the worse : a little fast kick or the ridiculous Palpatine CGI face ? and see him be hit like in very bad kung-fu movie and crawling on the floor like a dog (not a gay ;) ) ? OMG...we are talking about the Emperor ! seeing him in a ridiculous way is much more worst than my "quick kick".
You focus : " it's too rough !" ok ok...but look what it was ! you should always judge my cuts compared to the original...and you will see that there is always a good reason.
I'm not blind, I know perfectly every frame of this movie and and if certain things could be extended, I will do it with pleasure.
Some of my cuts are quick, not because I like this or because I don't have sens of timing...but only because there is no other way. That why in my videos I have create the "cutting process part", to show how much things I decided to remove are ridiculous.
in this battle : ugly/stupid VS shorter - I will always choose "shorter".
So it's a little useless to say then : "it's too short, it's rough "...I already know that...but keep in mind that the purpose here is not to propose a perfect cut but to avoid the disaster.
because what Lucas did is really a disaster...