logo Sign In

Reconstructions vs low quality originals

Author
Time

I heard some comments about this topic, but I wanted to organize these comments into one thread.

If you had to choose between a reconstruction of star wars like Harmy's, or the JSC/Defcol-Faces-Gout/Puggo/97LD/97DTV releases, which are lower resolution but consistent in quality, and in some cases provide more detail upscaled than that which is scrubbed from the 2004 transfers, which would it be?

Note: Preferring Harmys because of the audio options doesn't count.

Nobody sang The Bunny Song in years…

Author
Time

I love Harmy's work, but my go-to release of the trilogy is the JSC.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3

Author
Time

Generally prefer Harmy's.  The fact that some SE elements are present doesn't bother me as long as I really don't notice them, and all of the DeEd's have reached this threshold for me.  The only thing that really bugs me on occasion is the variability in quality (exceeding the already high variability of the theatrical versions).

I've noticed that the DVD downscales of the DeEd's "blend better" by putting an artificial upper limit on the detail, and that limited quality is still higher than any other non-reconstructed source--so for those who can't stand the variability, the DVD downscales of the DeEd's may work better.  That said, I still prefer to watch the 720p versions and suffer with the occasional jarring moment.

Honestly though I think it's not so much the resolution, but the colors that push Harmy's work over the top for me, especially for Star Wars.

Back when the DeEd's were at version 1.x, I preferred dark_jedi's work.  Still do in many ways for Jedi.  Those eyebrows, man...

Plus, I never really adjusted to the whole "Episode IV: A NEW HOPE" thing, so that limits my video options for Star Wars.

I'm hoping -1's work makes this whole "you must choose: high-def reconstruction or lo-def original" dichotomy moot.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time

I'm going to go with Harmy's reconstructions. I greatly appreciate his efforts to give us an HD version of the Star Wars trilogy without forcing the special edition changes on us. On top of that, with his commitment to continually improving them as his skills and available sources improve, I can look at any of the flaws as temporary. With the low-quality original sources, we're stuck with whatever limitations were present in the original formats, along with any poor decisions made regarding colors, DVNR, etc. Sure, they're technically original, but with low-resolution, bad color timing, and ugly video artifacts, I don't know that I can really consider them more faithful. I'll take the lovingly crafted reconstruction over the phone-it-in telecine.

Like CatBus and many others, I'm hoping that the results of the Team Negative1 project give us the best of both worlds. In the meantime, even their incomplete work has been a great asset to Harmy's work. 

Author
Time

If it wasn't so well done, I'd pick a consistent low quality version over Harmy's. Harmy's are beautiful to look at, and seamless enough for me. (ROTJ is a bit rough for the time being, but that'll be addressed soon enough.)

My stance on revising fan edits.

Author
Time

Danfun128 said:

Note: Preferring Harmys because of the audio options doesn't count.

 Says you.

Author
Time

AntcuFaalb said:

I love Harmy's work, but my go-to release of the trilogy is the JSC.

I second this sentiment.  I love my JSC set and wouldn't trade it for anything.

:)

Author
Time

Actually it's a bit like a Ship of Theseus. Question: you take a broom, you replace the handle. Then, later, you replace the brush. And you do that over and over again. Is it still the same broom? No, but you can still sweep the floor! Which is not strictly relevant. But what if you replace the handle and brush with duplicates of the original?

...well whatever. I'd choose Harmy's work. 's all I have really. Apart from my VHS tapes, of course.

Ol’ George has the GOUT, I see.

Author
Time

I vote Harmy's. When an original work is lost or no longer serviceable, a painstaking recreation from the original elements is ideal. It's not quite the same, but it's quite an achievement in itself.

Author
Time

KazolOrajia said:

I vote Harmy's. When an original work is lost or no longer serviceable, a painstaking recreation from the original elements is ideal. It's not quite the same, but it's quite an achievement in itself.

 I would think that the original is still ideal in such a case, but simply not a realistic option.

Author
Time

I personally like the colours of the JSC the most so that's what I would go with.