logo Sign In

Reasons why the O-OT is better than the SE — Page 2

Author
Time
Yeah, Jedikev, it would seem so. Think of all the summer blockbusters nowadays that depend on special effects or giant explosions. Eye candy, in other words. It's really rather ironic. Back when George Lucas first made Star Wars, pretty much all special effects had been done away with. He revived them, but now it's grown into a monster that he no longer has any control over. It's like in the Gary Kurtz interview, where he said that around Raiders of the Lost Ark, Lucas came to the conclusion that movie-goers were more interested in the "roller coaster ride" than the actual story, so his movies began to focus more on special effects with the story used simply as a means to propel the viewer from one special effects scene to the next. It's rather sad to think that he took us from one side of the spectrum to the other...

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time
I was watching an interview with Pete Jackson, and he was talking about how the SFX/stories have an arc that swings back and forth. Right now, the arc is swinging back more towards the story side, as having these huge FX doesn't really make a good movie, and audiences can see through it (IE, Alexander). Right now we're seeing a lot more dialogue intensive films becoming more mainstream, such as Sideways and Finding Neverland. Just my two cents.

On another point, I rather enjoy mindless summer blockbusters. They're a lot of fun, and some of them are actually fairly well done.

Gentlemen, you can’t fight in here, this is the war room!

Author
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: Anchorhead
Quote

Originally posted by: Jedikev
Special Effects are not important...the characters are.

Not to the current generation of movie goers. The 20-somethings these days haven't come up in a culture where they use their imagination. They've had bright, quickly-moving images hold their attention for them. No time to do any deep thinking, the movie will tell them what to think. The movie will tie up all the loose ends for them. Don't bother using your brain to think or contribute to the story with your imagination.

Mate, that's BS. I think you'll find that us 2o somethings who grew up in the 80s prefer the old stuff. It's the ones born in the late 80s early 90s who your statement applies to, and it's not their fault because that's what they grew up with.

War does not make one great.

Author
Time
I concur with Yoda, being born in 83 myself.


Made for IE Forum's Episode III theme month - May 2005.

Author
Time
Agreed... born in 87 and can't stand the new ones.

Gentlemen, you can’t fight in here, this is the war room!

Author
Time
I grew up with the movies in my childhood, and now that man prevents me from ever seeing them again.
"A Jedi can feel the force flow through him".
Author
Time
Thatt pretty much sums it up. Shame that it's never that simple to those who disagree.


Made for IE Forum's Episode III theme month - May 2005.

Author
Time
I just wish George could give the fans what they want. Instead we have suffer
http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/2348/liverpool7vb1.png