Reading back through the “Last movie seen” thread, I can’t help but facepalm at the low ratings I used to give so many movies back then. Case in point:
DuracellEnergizer said:
Black Narcissus (1947)
Not a bad film - the actors and cinematography are all very good - but it didn’t really get interesting until towards the end, when Kathleen Byron’s character goes crazy. I really think that if this movie had been written as an out-and-out horror film and directed as such, I would have liked it alot more.
5.1/10
DuracellEnergizer said:
Bingowings said:
5.1???
That’s crazy talk!
At the very least it’s one of the most important special effects films ever made.
Sister Ruth has to go mad near the end because of the tensions (sexual, sensual etc) have reached boiling point.
She is pretty warm to start with as it is, if you started with her at boiling point she would have evaporated by the end of the film.
I rate a movie by my reaction to it, not by how well the movie was put together; if I did rate movies that way, this would have gotten somewhere in the neighbourhood of 9/10. But that isn’t the way my pendulum swings, so I went with 5.1/10, which - IMHO - doesn’t mean it was a bad film, just an okay one.
As for Ruth, no, I didn’t want her crazy from the get-go. I just would have liked that chilling atmosphere from the last part of the movie where she is crazy present throughout the entire film. That alone would have made me like the film more; no script changes, no change in actors or performances, no scenes added or cut, just an overall more sinister tone.
Ugh. I gave Black Narcissus 5.1/10? Really?! I’m as flabbergasted at that low number now as Bingo was back then.
I’m so glad I eventually ditched the stupid “visceral reaction only” criteria for evaluating movies for a more even-handed approach. I just wish I had done so far sooner.