logo Sign In

'Raiders of the Lost Ark' - bluray and colour timing changes (Released) — Page 14

Author
Time

CodySolo said:

So the only hope for a fully HD version of the original pole and reflection shots is to find a copy of that pre-Lowry alterations HD broadcast?   

Yes. I've been hunting it down like a dog. It was released by the group "Absinth" sometime in 2005 and is either 14.36GB or 14.38GB.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3

Author
Time
 (Edited)

captainsolo said:

It has been said the WS LD was remixed, but nothing I have found points to this. Some claimed a few sound effects were different, but I haven't found any. This track has music panning not in the DVD 5.1 which was created from the 70mm mix. Perhaps it could be either the Dolby original or abandoned VistaSonic original mix which was supposed to have mixed in stereo surrounds. Either way it would be helpful to compare against the old pan n' scan disc for differences.

I don't know if the Widescreen LD was a complete re-mix but at least the sound of the staff being dropped into the map room is different on that LD compared to the original Dolby mix.

Btw, here's what The Digital Bits had to say back in 2003:

"You should also know that Lucasfilm and Paramount have gone in and made some minor fixes to these films, erasing elements that weren't originally intended to be seen. So, for example, when Indy falls into the Well of Souls now, you won't see the reflection of the cobra on the glass that was placed to protect actor Harrison Ford. Also, when the giant stone ball rolls after Indy in the opening of Raiders, a support beam that guided the ball on the set has been erased. We're told that some 14 minor fixes were made to these films in all."

So apparently some 14 minor fixes... This article mention clean-up of blue fringing: http://www.indianajones.de/dvd/texte/restore.php 

Not sure which shot he refer to but if I recall correctly the opening of the Well of Souls scenes that was shot against blue screen had some blue fringing in the original film.

CodySolo said:

So the only hope for a fully HD version of the original pole and reflection shots is to find a copy of that pre-Lowry alterations HD broadcast?

Or scan an original film print.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time
 (Edited)

The theory of the LBX LD mix being based on the Vistasonic mix is interesting, though unfortunately it couldn't be proven unless the Vistasonic mix were to surface. I guess they would have taken the stems, collapsed the split surrounds into mono, and converted it to an LCRS matrix?

The late, great disclord wrote on LDDB that the Dolby Stereo and 70mm mixes were basically directly converted from the Vistasonic mix, but if there are differences between the DVD and LBX LD, and between the P&S and LBX LDs, that could be evidence against that claim.

The P&S Dolby mix needs to be preserved. The only problem is that it was only ever released in the U.S. in analog. (There isn't even an LDDB listing for a stealth digital re-pressing, like they have for that supposed PCM issue of Grease that SilverWook and I could never actually find a copy of.)

I'm curious if the Japanese P&S/PCM disc, released three years before the U.S. LBX, has the same mix as the U.S. P&S, but in digital. There's a copy available on LDDB for $20...

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TServo2049 said:

The P&S Dolby mix needs to be preserved. The only problem is that it was only ever released in the U.S. in analog.

This, perhaps? http://www.lddb.com/laserdisc/47205/SLC-007C/Indiana-Jones:-Raiders-of-the-Lost-Ark-%281981%29

Hmmm... still digging.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TServo2049 said:

The P&S Dolby mix needs to be preserved. The only problem is that it was only ever released in the U.S. in analog. (There isn't even an LDDB listing for a stealth digital re-pressing, like they have for that supposed PCM issue of Grease that SilverWook and I could never actually find a copy of.)

 Already done (at least the analog part). I did a rip a couple years ago of the analog soundtrack from this LD:

http://www.lddb.com/laserdisc/11029/LV-1376/Indiana-Jones:-Raiders-of-the-Lost-Ark-(1981)

since there were rumors the letterbox soundtrack was changed. 

Author
Time

I've now done lots of still comparisons with WOWOW vs. grade-matched BD and I can honestly say that the WOWOW, surprisingly, has more detail.

The software I use for the MatchGrade also has a basic image registration algorithm, so the stills used for my comparison were spatially aligned rather well.

The difference is striking.

I'd like to despecialize the WOWOW, but I can't without access to that 10 year old 1080i MPEG-2 ABC TV broadcast version capture. I'm still digging, but I haven't had any luck yet.

For now we may have to settle on the 2003 "enhanced" version.

I still have to remove the burned-in JP subs from those shots. I may seek outside help to get it done well.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3

Author
Time

AntcuFaalb said:

I've now done lots of still comparisons with WOWOW vs. grade-matched BD and I can honestly say that the WOWOW, surprisingly, has more detail.

Good to hear that... I thought to be completely crazy... (^^,)

Sadly my projects are lost due to an HDD crash… 😦 | [Fundamental Collection] thread | blog.spoRv.com | fan preservation forum: fanres.com

Author
Time

PDB does your analog track match the DVD or the WS LD on the staff drop? I've long been curious about that. Of course I just now went back and re-compared the two. The DVD has one sound of the stick hitting, and the LD has it roll around slightly.

The rest sounds the same but the WS LD mix has a potency that isn't in the 5.1. I don't know how to explain it exactly but it packs a lot more punch overall. Additionally the score has some directionality that isn't in the discrete version.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time

captainsolo said:

Additionally the score has some directionality that isn't in the discrete version.

Can you be more specific regarding this directionality of the score, any particular scenes that stands out in this mix, I saw the movie with this track last year but didn't notice then. Would like to compare.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

IIRC it's in the truck chase as Indy approaches on horseback. I'll have to re-watch and take notes.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time

captainsolo said:

IIRC it's in the truck chase as Indy approaches on horseback. I'll have to re-watch and take notes.

 Thanks. Will check it out.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Keep in mind that when listening to an upmixed stereo track, any perceived directionality has a significant chance of being a steering artifact from the upmixing process, rather than actually being an inherent part of the mix itself.  This is especially true of older processes such as the first Prologic.

There will also be a significant amount of crosstalk between channels, especially in the surrounds, of things that shouldn't really be there but can't be entirely kept out.  Prologic II reduces these kinds of issues, providing a more stable sound field, though it can't eliminate them completely.  Only discrete channel mixes accurately represent the true imaging of the source.

If anybody wants to send me the various laserdisc tracks for Raiders, I will compare them to each other and to the DVD and Bluray versions and see what I can find out about their relative dynamics and balance.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

captainsolo said:

PDB does your analog track match the DVD or the WS LD on the staff drop? I've long been curious about that. Of course I just now went back and re-compared the two. The DVD has one sound of the stick hitting, and the LD has it roll around slightly.

The rest sounds the same but the WS LD mix has a potency that isn't in the 5.1. I don't know how to explain it exactly but it packs a lot more punch overall. Additionally the score has some directionality that isn't in the discrete version.

 I assume we are talking about when Indy drops the staff into the map room. If so there is definitely a difference. The digital has a bounce sound. Here is a sample, I'll keep it hosted for a few days. The first sound is the staff hitting on the P&S analog LD's soundtrack and the second is the widescreen LD's soundtrack.

https://mega.co.nz/#!2UMzgToa!niZ7PdLISdRxbqfCJcc89--zwZ6wprGOe5syDoBKccU

Here is what it looks like (first the analog, second digital)

I didn't have the DVD handy to compare but I'm sure someone will compare this sample to that and the BD.

Author
Time

hairy_hen said:

If anybody wants to send me the various laserdisc tracks for Raiders, I will compare them to each other and to the DVD and Bluray versions and see what I can find out about their relative dynamics and balance.

 I'll send you a copy of both LD tracks I have, hairy_hen. I'm already uploading the analog for someone else. Just give me a bit to upload the digital too.

Just FYI, the analog capture is raw so there are big gaps from the disc switching, ads, trailers, a false start, dead air at the end, etc. I didn't get around to syncing it so I didn't clean it up. The digital is cut down since I did sync it.

Skipping through my analog capture you can tell its not as dynamic as the PCM. It sounds nice in some place and a little wobbly in others.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I think the 1989 Japanese P&S LD needs to be checked. It has digital sound, it could well have a PCM version of the same mix heard on the U.S. analog P&S disc.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

sporv do you have a dlc download or a myspleen torrent of your halloween edit if not please put one up.

Author
Time

jedimasterobiwan said:

spoRv do you a have a myspleen torrent or b have a dlc download for your halloween edit?

Wrong thread. I suggest PMing Andrea.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3

Author
Time

i don't know what happened you have to highlight my above message to see it sporv.

Author
Time

jedimasterobiwan said:

i don't know what happened you have to highlight my above message to see it sporv.

Why are you asking about Halloween in a Raiders of the Lost Ark thread?

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3

Author
Time

because one i don't where the search option is and two i don't know how far in the forum the halloween thread is.

Author
Time

All you have to do is a search like this originaltrilogy.com.halloween in google.

There isn't any search option on the OT.

Now back to Raiders of the Lost Ark discussion. :)

Author
Time

for the record, the correct command would be "site:originaltrilogy.com/forum halloween" (without quotes of course).

Nobody sang The Bunny Song in years…

Author
Time

Danfun128 said:

for the record, the correct command would be "site:originaltrilogy.com/forum halloween" (without quotes of course).

 Not really because either one will work, so no i wasn't wrong.

Author
Time

DoomBot said:

Danfun128 said:

for the record, the correct command would be "site:originaltrilogy.com/forum halloween" (without quotes of course).

 Not really because either one will work, so no i wasn't wrong.

Neither of you are wrong. The difference is that yours will pull in non-originaltrilogy.com hits as well. Using the "site:" operator restricts the search to just within the given site.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3

Author
Time

Update: Harmy removed the burned-in South America 1936 Japanese subtitles beautifully, so that's done!

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3