ElDonante said:
My copy of the 3D Bluray won't arrive until Thursday and I don't have a BD drive in this machine anymore, so I won't be able to rip it and adjust, but...
...what I'd do is rip the audio track, check it's frame amount, then add the difference as silence to the front of the DTS track. They should both end at the same spot.
I wonder how hard it would be to do a scan of a print ourselves. The cheating method would be to telesync with an HD camera adjusted properly, but it would only be 1080p and wouldn't be a true scan, but maybe closer to theatrically accurate than what we're being fed.
They actually end at different spots: the 3D credits have an added bit for the stereoscopic conversion. Even the Amblin logo fades a bit faster too I believe. I could try comparing. Just using time shifting, my copy seemed relatively successful. If anyone wants to follow the same method I did above and see if I just can't evaluate delay, that'd be great. Again, I'm no expert but I was pleased with what I got.
I got a real good look at the transfer finally too. It isn't perfect for sure, but I'm not faulting it completely since I'm watching a 2D version of a 3D file. That being said, I did lower the color saturation on my projector to match what I feel is accurate and the results were not too bad. There are many shots still with a lot of detail, but others do feel a bit "scrubbed". The 35mm print I saw last year was actually very similar to that, but I think it still had more detail than what we're seeing here.
It just felt more film-like to me than the 2011 transfer, which feels so overly enhanced and digital.