logo Sign In

Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo — Page 511

This topic has been locked by a moderator.

Author
Time

Warbler said:

and yet he was still allowed to buy guns. unbelievable.

He wasn’t “still allowed”. The information barring him from purchasing guns was never submitted to the proper authorities where it would have shown up on any background check.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Tyrphanax said:

Warbler said:

and yet he was still allowed to buy guns. unbelievable.

He wasn’t “still allowed”. The information barring him from purchasing guns was never submitted to the proper authorities where it would have shown up on any background check.

that is kinda what I meant. Sounds like multiple different agencies failed to properly report.

Air Force, whatever agency should have reported his Federal conviction for domestic assault, something tells me being in and especially escaping a mental hospital should probably keep one from buying guns so I bet that was not properly reported by whomever should have reported it. Multiple entities failed.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

UK Robot Wars - Meet Donald Thump: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qagOsz6v2_0

Much like the robot’s real life counterpart, it soon got tired of winning.

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time

Dems swept down here (which isn’t a surprise considering Tucson is pretty blue).

It’s been nice to see that a Trump endorsement has been more or less a political death sentence this round of elections.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/07/politics/ted-lieu-moment-of-silence-protest-guns/index.html

While I understand the point of why he walked out, I still think he was wrong. I think it one of the things wrong today, we politicize everything. Now we politicize moments of silence. It is ridiculous.

Rep. Lieu said “I respect their right to do that and I myself have participated in many of them. But I can’t do this again. I’ve been to too many moments of silences. Just in my short career in Congress, three of the worst mass shootings in US history have occurred. I will not be silent. What we need is we need action, we need to pass gun safety legislation now.”

No one was telling him to be silence about whatever it is he thinks should be done about these mass shootings and guns. He doesn’t have to be silent about that stuff. All he had to do was remain silent for a moment in respect for those that died, then he could have screamed his head off. He acted like the moment of silence was some sort of attempt to silence debate about guns and mass shootings and used it like a catchphrase “I will not be silent” that is wrong.

Also a big bleep you goes out to Wil Wheaton. http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/11/05/wil-wheaton-angers-people-faith-with-furious-tweet-at-paul-ryan.html He can criticize Paul Ryan for not doing all you think he should do in regards to mass shootings and guns and I might very well agree. What he shouldn’t do is criticize Ryan for saying the victims and their families need our prayers. There is nothing wrong with saying that. Saying people should pray, doesn’t at all stop one from doing whatever else you think he should or shouldn’t do. Criticize him for not passing gun control legislation, but don’t criticize him for saying people need prayer. Also, Wil, keep your bigotry towards religion to yourself and please remember that this shooting happened in a church, to church goers. I doubt they would object to people praying from them.

Author
Time

Yeah the Liberal snapback from Trump’s stupid reign is probably going to end up in a Democrat supermajority that ends up slapping us with a bunch of stupid California-esque gun control laws.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

Tyrphanax said:

Yeah the Liberal snapback from Trump’s stupid reign is probably going to end up in a Democrat supermajority that ends up slapping us with a bunch of stupid California-esque gun control laws.

Imagine how many people will die as a result… Oh

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Warbler said:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/07/politics/ted-lieu-moment-of-silence-protest-guns/index.html

No one was telling him to be silence about whatever it is he thinks should be done about these mass shootings and guns.

No one? Are you sure?

Warbler said:

Also a big bleep you goes out to Wil Wheaton. http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/11/05/wil-wheaton-angers-people-faith-with-furious-tweet-at-paul-ryan.html

Notice Wheaton does make a genuine apology (to people of faith), in that same article for losing his cool towards Ryan.

What you are perhaps missing, is that some people feel waaaaay more anger and frustration about this issue, than they feel sadness. I’m sure they felt sad and in need of prayer, long, long ago but the amount of death and the amount of inaction (from politicians like Ryan) since then, mean that him saying people “need our prayers right now” yet again, instead of people “need us actually do something for once!” seem pretty f*cking insulting and hypocritical.

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time

Tyrphanax said:

Yeah the Liberal snapback from Trump’s stupid reign is probably going to end up in a Democrat supermajority that ends up slapping us with a bunch of stupid California-esque gun control laws.

Can’t wait.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TM2YC said:

Warbler said:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/07/politics/ted-lieu-moment-of-silence-protest-guns/index.html

No one was telling him to be silence about whatever it is he thinks should be done about these mass shootings and guns.

No one? Are you sure?

Well who do you think was telling him to be silent about whatever he thinks should be don about mass shooting and guns? Even if someone did, he doesn’t have to listen to them. 1st amendment.

Warbler said:

Also a big bleep you goes out to Wil Wheaton. http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/11/05/wil-wheaton-angers-people-faith-with-furious-tweet-at-paul-ryan.html

Notice Wheaton does make a genuine apology (to people of faith), in that same article for losing his cool towards Ryan.

oops. missed that.

What you are perhaps missing, is that some people feel waaaaay more anger and frustration about this issue, than they feel sadness.

They should feel both.

I’m sure they felt sad and in need of prayer, long, long ago but the amount of death and the amount of inaction (from politicians like Ryan) since then, mean that him saying people “need our prayers right now” yet again, instead of people “need us actually do something for once!” seem pretty f*cking insulting and hypocritical.

Then like I said, criticize Ryan for not doing whatever it is you think he should do, instead of criticizing him for saying the people effected need our prayers. They are not mutually exclusive activities.

Author
Time

Warbler said:

TM2YC said:

Warbler said:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/07/politics/ted-lieu-moment-of-silence-protest-guns/index.html

No one was telling him to be silence about whatever it is he thinks should be done about these mass shootings and guns.

No one? Are you sure?

Well who do you think was telling him to be silent about whatever he thinks should be don about mass shooting and guns? Even if someone did, he doesn’t have to listen to them. 1st amendment.

Just one example…

Warbler said:

TM2YC said:
What you are perhaps missing, is that some people feel waaaaay more anger and frustration about this issue, than they feel sadness.

They should feel both.

As I was saying, many people are so far beyond sadness with these mass shootings, that all they feel now is anger. Being sad about it isn’t going to stop it happening again, directing your anger at hypocrites like Ryan, just might.

Warbler said:

TM2YC said:
I’m sure they felt sad and in need of prayer, long, long ago but the amount of death and the amount of inaction (from politicians like Ryan) since then, mean that him saying people “need our prayers right now” yet again, instead of people “need us actually do something for once!” seem pretty f*cking insulting and hypocritical.

Then like I said, criticize Ryan for not doing whatever it is you think he should do, instead of criticizing him for saying the people effected need our prayers. They are not mutually exclusive activities.

The people don’t need his prayers, they need his action, so more families don’t face the same situation. Ryan asking people to pray for dead families, that he happily did nothing to save is crocodile tears. Tomorrow he’ll also do nothing and the day after that there will be another mass-shooting and he’ll call for prayers again. Rinse and repeat. Ryan praying for his own soul would be more productive.

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time

dahmage said:

Tyrphanax said:

Yeah the Liberal snapback from Trump’s stupid reign is probably going to end up in a Democrat supermajority that ends up slapping us with a bunch of stupid California-esque gun control laws.

Imagine how many people will die as a result… Oh

Lol.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TM2YC said:

Warbler said:

TM2YC said:

Warbler said:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/07/politics/ted-lieu-moment-of-silence-protest-guns/index.html

No one was telling him to be silence about whatever it is he thinks should be done about these mass shootings and guns.

No one? Are you sure?

Well who do you think was telling him to be silent about whatever he thinks should be don about mass shooting and guns? Even if someone did, he doesn’t have to listen to them. 1st amendment.

Just one example…

Like I said, he is free to ignore that and I strongly suggest he do so. I am not saying Lieu shouldn’t scream his head off about the need for more gun control, in fact I agree with it. I am just saying he can be silent for a moment.

Warbler said:

TM2YC said:
What you are perhaps missing, is that some people feel waaaaay more anger and frustration about this issue, than they feel sadness.

They should feel both.

As I was saying, many people are so far beyond sadness with these mass shootings, that all they feel now is anger.

Well they should feel both. Yes be angry about this happening again and again and the politicians not doing enough about it. But also be sad because 26 innocent people (many of whom were kids) are dead. I guarantee you the families of the victims aren’t just angry, they are sad too.

Being sad about it isn’t going to stop it happening again, directing your anger at hypocrites like Ryan, just might.

Not being sad won’t stop it either. Politicizing a moment of silent won’t stop it either.

Warbler said:

TM2YC said:
I’m sure they felt sad and in need of prayer, long, long ago but the amount of death and the amount of inaction (from politicians like Ryan) since then, mean that him saying people “need our prayers right now” yet again, instead of people “need us actually do something for once!” seem pretty f*cking insulting and hypocritical.

Then like I said, criticize Ryan for not doing whatever it is you think he should do, instead of criticizing him for saying the people effected need our prayers. They are not mutually exclusive activities.

The people don’t need his prayers, they need his action, so more families don’t face the same situation.

Maybe you are not religious, so you do not understand the significance and importance of prayer. But I am sure the members of that church do understand the significance and importance of prayer.

Yes, they need his action. They are also need our prayers.

Ryan asking people to pray for dead families, that he happily did nothing to save is crocodile tears. Tomorrow he’ll also do nothing and the day after that there will be another mass-shooting and he’ll call for prayers again. Rinse and repeat. Ryan praying for his own soul would be more productive.

Prayer and passing gun control are not mutually exclusive activities.

The argument you are making in regards to prayer, I could make in regards to him wearing a suit and tie everyday.

Criticize him for not doing enough in Congress to prevent these tragedies. Don’t criticizing him for asking for prayers.

Author
Time

I already said I wouldn’t object if the third stanza’s lyrics were carefully altered so that they would no longer be offensive.

Author
Time

Huh. Ok, didn’t know that. I assumed you believed the National Anthem was sacred.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Huh. Ok, didn’t know that.

pretty sure I mentioned it a while back in the thread.

I assumed you believed the National Anthem was sacred.

not to the point where I am against a few lyrics in the 3rd stanza being altered to make them less offensive.

Author
Time

I’ve never even heard of the third stanza until a few weeks ago, so I don’t know why it’s so important.

Author
Time

Its part of the National Anthem.

Author
Time

yhwx said:

I’ve never even heard of the third stanza until a few weeks ago, so I don’t know why it’s so important.

It’s not.

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

yhwx said:

I’ve never even heard of the third stanza until a few weeks ago, so I don’t know why it’s so important.

It’s not.

opinion.