That’s true, but Hillary and his primary opponents in the GOP also didn’t respond to it well. I think if any one of those Republicans would have called him out on stage and called him, “an incompetent fool with no working knowledge of government or global affairs that spews nonsense so incomprehensible that it’s capable of dropping the IQ of any sentient being, as well as a lying, serial-adulterer whose ungodly antics make anyone with a conscience vomit in their mouths,” then I don’t think he’d have been able to respond well, but they all took this weird, pseudo high road that looked pathetic and weak. Hillary also should have pressed the incompetence issue harder than she did, and campaigned in the rust belt a little bit instead of not at all. Keep in mind, Donald Trump lost the popular vote by three million votes. His victory was dependent on only about 100,000 votes spread across multiple states. People need to keep in mind that apathy on the part of Democratic voters, and stunning idiocy on the part of the Democratic Party (and Hillary) gave Trump one of the most narrow victories in the history of the American presidency. If his unfathomable incompetence continues like this for four years, I suspect he’ll lose in a landslide. There’ll never be a landslide like Reagan’s victories again, since California and New York, with some others, will always go Democrat and the South will always go Republican, but I think it’s fear-mongering to count on Trump winning again. That said, if it keeps people from being apathetic and choosing not to vote against him, then maybe it’s necessary.