PT vs OT Scientific Study — Page 5

So wait, you're saying you like Grievous better than...Vader?

Did I misunderstand that?  Please tell me I misunderstood that.

Sluggo said:

twooffour said:

I go into a Chinese restaurant or something... then I get all well-ahound cookie, I eaten it, then I open it, and look, there is a message within!!

Are you saying that you don't look at the fortune until you have eaten the cookie?  That's what I do.  I'm superstitious that if I don't eat the cookie first, the fortune won't come true.

I never sed I eaten it all before reading the fortune, there's always some bits left, here and there... things get overlooked. But not forever!

greenpenguino said:

twooffour said:

greenpenguino said:

twooffour said:

Grievous is better than Vayden!

 

Well, yeah of course Grievous is better than Vayden, because Vayden couldn't be bothered to show up in the films, lazy bugger.

 

But Grievous being better than Vader. Nah, definitely not

wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah

Hey, that's what cookie says. Can't argue with cookie.

Oh ok, fair enough

 

twooffour said:

What you gonna say to the cookie? Speak to the cookie!

Eeerrrrm... hello cookie??

twooffour said:

blah blah your opinion's a fact blah blah just your opinion. blah blah You don't have to be always right ? blah

...

err, yeah. I do. duh

k

xhonzi said:

TV's Frink said:

So wait, you're saying you like Grievous better than...Vader?

Did I misunderstand that?  Please tell me I misunderstood that.

I think he was saying that Grevious was better than Hayden's portrayal of Anakin or Vader.  Hence: Hayder.  Or was it Vayden?

Grievous is sure better than Christensen's portrayal, but I really just meant to spout off a complete bullshit statement with a lame pun tossed in.

Guess I hadn't thought of that! Btw, how can you read my posts?

TV's Frink said:

So wait, you're saying you like Grievous better than...Vader?

Did I misunderstand that?  Please tell me I misunderstood that.

Yea, that's what I was saying. You didn't misunderstand.

twooffour said:

TV's Frink said:

So wait, you're saying you like Grievous better than...Vader?

Did I misunderstand that?  Please tell me I misunderstood that.

Yea, that's what I was saying. You didn't misunderstand.

Gotcha.

Yeah, but then he said he likes Grievous better than Vader.  Maybe we need to clear this up.

2/4, are you saying you like Grievous better than OT Vader?  Better than ANH or ESB Vader?

So why the incredulity in your voice? Do you somehow thing this opinion of mine is outrageous and dumb?

Question for me?

TV's Frink said:

Yeah, but then he said he likes Grievous better than Vader.  Maybe we need to clear this up.

2/4, are you saying you like Grievous better than OT Vader?  Better than ANH or ESB Vader?

"Yea, that's what I was saying. You didn't misunderstand."

greenpenguino said:

xhonzi said:

TV's Frink said:

So wait, you're saying you like Grievous better than...Vader?

Did I misunderstand that?  Please tell me I misunderstood that.

I think he was saying that Grevious was better than Hayden's portrayal of Anakin or Vader.  Hence: Hayder.  Or was it Vayden?

OOOoooohh!! Ok!! That's what he meant! (Why didn't he say Prequel Trilogy Vader, would've made sense)

 

 

No I didn't!

twooffour said:

So why the incredulity in your voice? Do you somehow thing this opinion of mine is outrageous and dumb?

The idea that Grievous is a better character than Vader is probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard on this site.  It's an opinion that isn't wrong (no such thing) but it's an opinion that is insane.

However, you said "better," not "better character," so I now wait for you to educated me on your definition of "better."

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

So why the incredulity in your voice? Do you somehow thing this opinion of mine is outrageous and dumb?

The idea that Grievous is a better character than Vader is probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard on this site.  It's an opinion that isn't wrong (no such thing) but it's an opinion that is insane.

However, you said "better," not "better character," so I now wait for you to educated me on your definition of "better."

You do realize that "insane" is basically like a super-duperlative of "wrong", right?

Um, I can think you are insane for having an certain opinion.  But your opinion is not wrong.

Why do I keep forgetting how pointless it is to discuss things with you?

It's getting pretty tense in here!

BTW, STAY ON TOPIC!

And . . . another thread gone into pointless wasted bickering.

And another gets on, and another gets on, another one rides the bus . . . Hey, he's gonna sit by you, another one rides the bus!

TV's Frink said:

Um, I can think you are insane for having an certain opinion.  But your opinion is not wrong.

Why do I keep forgetting how pointless it is to discuss things with you?

Well right now I'm damn sure it is, because you're basically being had in the most obvious way and aren't even realizing it.

Do you even realize what you're saying? An insane person, is usually what we call someone who suffers from delusions and hallucinations, or holds highly distorted views of themselves and their environment. In the broadest sense, it can mean someone who's abandoned all rational thought and is hopelessly caught in dogmatic, circular way of thinking.

To be insane, MEANS to be WRONG; VERY, wrong.

On the other hand, normal everyday people, incl. the inteligent ones, can be "wrong" about something all the time. It's a normal occurrence. And if the subject is an "opinion" about something, based on flawed judgment and observation, then guess what, THE OPINION IS WRONG.

Wanna play this game? Alright, you asked me whether I meant "character" or not, right? Well, let's just go with "character", for the heck of it.

I'd really like see you dance yourself a way out of that one. So saying that Grievous had a better characterization than Vader somehow isn't "wrong"? Because an opinion can't be wrong, right... but it can be INSANE!

Just for the record, finding Jar Jar Binks funny isn't called "insane", it's called "having an unusual taste". Before you get confused with terms and all...

greenpenguino said:

twooffour said:

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

So why the incredulity in your voice? Do you somehow thing this opinion of mine is outrageous and dumb?

The idea that Grievous is a better character than Vader is probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard on this site.  It's an opinion that isn't wrong (no such thing) but it's an opinion that is insane.

However, you said "better," not "better character," so I now wait for you to educated me on your definition of "better."

You do realize that "insane" is basically like a super-duperlative of "wrong", right?

mm hmm, yeah.

And judging by the beginning of the thread I'd say that because Vader had a bigger impact on 'TheBoost' students than Grievous, Vader is the Better...thingy. And BTW how do you know Frink had incredulity in his voice? You do realise you're reading text on a screen?? Not a voice?

Vader being more known among students doesn't lead to ANY such conclusions.

If you seriously apply the,.. appeal to popularity to anything concerning art or entertainment, you clearly need to grow up a lot.

Take a look at Angus MacFadyen's performance in the piece of shit "Warriors of Virtue" - that guy trumps Grievous in the "campy over-the-top villain" territory by like 10 times, Grievous'a  complete bore compared to him, so how come "Komodo from Warriors of Virtue" probably isn't anywhere as well known as Grievous?

I'm sorry, I'm pretty sure twooffour was typing things, but considering how insane they made him sound, I stopped reading after a bit.

...

Although I like the tone of the OP, I think all it really shows is that Grievous is not a cultural icon the way Vader is.