logo Sign In

Our Fault, Not George's?

Author
Time

Most of us have a collection of some sort of entertainment medium. TV series on DVD, audiobooks, regular books, video games, movies, CDs, etc. Some of those artists or fictional worlds touch us more than others. I guess the OT touches most of us more than other series of movies or any other medium. I could be wrong, but to be sure we all feel pretty strongly about the OT - or at least we did at one time.

There was a sixteen-year gap between SW-branded movies. During that time, we had a substantial EU output which, while it sometimes left us wanting more, seemed on the whole to be of much greater quality (in lesser quantity) than the second, post-1999 EU output. And that first EU movement, I believe, strongly entertained the bulk of the old fans.

I would argue that by the time The Phantom Menace rolled around, Lucas was in no position to make a good film. By then, us OT fans had enjoyed the SW experience to the point where it was personal. And the only way to satisfy already sated fans was to make sure that the new films never strayed from our collective perception of what a SW film was at its essence. Lucas was at a great disadvantage going into the PT - he hadn't been as ensconced in the SW universe as we were, IMO. Furthermore, it's hard to figure out what large groups of people are thinking.

I'm bolding and underlining the next sentence of this paragraph to be as clear as I can: I am not trying to excuse George Lucas' woefully embarrassing return to the world of SW. Lucas probably couldn't have reached us OT fans with the PT, but his haphazard attempt missed the mark so badly, it's as though he wanted to piss us off. (With the release of the GOUT, he was open about it) Lucas seemed to think that an easy-to-follow story plus action and explosions plus superficial ties to SW (lightsabers, Jedi, various alien species, returning characters) equals a full return to the glory days of SW. Sadly, the endless stream of cash the movies made probably convinced him he nailed it.

But this isn't about Lucas. I'm exploring the possibility that maybe, with our strong and personal love for the OT having been in place for sixteen years, maybe no one could have made the PT great. Now, if Lucas had chosen to go forward in time, rather than backward, perhaps it might have worked. Maybe. Your thoughts?

Want to book yourself or a guest on THE VFP Show? PM me!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I strongly disagree that i am at fault in any way for star wars being destroyed, Lucas did it and is still doing it.

Lucas made it personal when he crapped all over the originals then disavowed their existence, then releases a laserdisc master to dvd in 2006 which in no way in any way was acceptable.

I don't give a crap about the special editions and the prequels.  My dissatisfaction and bitterness as a fan comes from the originals not being given a restoration and DVD/Blu Ray release.

The prequels and special editions can rot for all i care, and i still love a lot of the EU a great deal when authors who can actually write compelling stories sometimes, unlike a certain bearded man in a flannel shirt.  Which is strange because the original trilogy was a great story.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time

It isn't success that causes people to start producing crap. I admit that people will sell out. But we are not to blame. If I had a huge following for something I did I would try my best to keep those people happy.

as SkyJedi stated George basically just swept what in his mind is just a workprint under the rug. The only evidence of the original trilogy as it was from 77-83 is our minds and the shitty VHSs and Laserdisc copies we have sitting on our shelves next to movies that suck and have actually been remastered and released in high definition. You can't go out and buy the original trilogy in atleast 720p but you can go out and buy Gone With The Wind restored to beautiful quality on blu ray.

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas

<span> </span>

Author
Time

Yep, that's the fact.

And I seriously doubt the OT will ever be remastered, so I'm going to stick with the GOUT no matter how bad it is. At least we can watch the remains of what was the OOT for a couple decades.

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

If Lucas had made prequel films that were true to the spirit of Star Wars, they'd be much better received. The prequel trilogy was always meant to be a bit different in tone, but the one he put out was a whole damn different galaxy away in tone and mentality and that should have been avoided (and could easily have been avoided). A bit more effort to fit in with the story of the originals would have been no harm either.

It's also evident that Lucas must have changed some things from his original backstory. Some of the lame things that look like new inventions may actually go way back, but I'd guess there's still plenty stuff that was changed or newly invented. And if some of the crappy things go way back, well that's where he should have applied a bit of editorial stringency and cut the shit. In the OT he kept out some things he'd invented back then that were best left out (such a midichlorians) and it would have been good if he'd done the same with the prequels. As in no Annie builds 3PO (yes that probably does go way back -see the expanding the universe chapter of The Making of Star Wars). The originals showed some judgement, while the prequels didn't. Surely it would not have been that hard to apply some judgement in the making of the prequels?

The originals had honesty, sincerity, genuineness of feeling and imagination. The first prequel had hints of that mixed in with the shit and shallowness but was overall an artificial film that was overly sweetened up and didn't believe in itself. The later two prequels were horrific examples of shallowness, lack of emotional depth, soullessness, artificiality, stilted crap and general bullshit, with terrible judgement. It would have been fucking EASY to avoid making the films like that. Just as it would have been fucking easy to keep the podraces and cartoon characters out of TPM and make the central character less lame and limited.

And lame and limited as lil Annie was in TPM, he was light years worse in AOTC and ROTS. That has to be hands down the most horrific destruction of a great character ever. In ROTJ we meet non-evil Anakin and you strongly get the impression that there's really something to the guy. He could NEVER have been the shallow spiteful wimp Anakin of AOTC and ROTS. Him having something to him was crucial to both ROTJ and the trilogy as a whole. And Vader too could never in a thousand universes have been the Hayden version of Anakin. The total break between the prequel and OT versions of Anakin/Vader is a massive break that could easily have been avoided. Clearly Lucas entirely reenvisioned the character, with seemingly no concern for what the OT had established. That reenvisioning makes it entirely impossible to take the two trilogies together as the one big six-part movie Lucas wants us to them as.

Also I've read things about the prequels that sound to me like Lucas pretty much deliberately making them bad movies. For example, in an interview he talks about how he wants to make the AOTC romance in such a way that men and "cynical" (read "intelligent", I think) people won't like it. Or something like that. There's also a quote from McCallum about how they knew as far back as 1990 that the first two prequels were going to be "hard" (I think that was his word, maybe it was "difficult") with anybody who had any connection to the original films (by which I think he meant anybody who was a fan of them) and anybody over 18. Or something like that. It sounds to me like "We set out to make films that would be at odds with the original trilogy and which we knew people would hate". And then there's this thing about making the prequels like old serials, which seems to me (after reading Kaminski's book) like it was taken as a license to make shallow films that lacked emotional depth. There's also the example of Palpatine's ROTS makeup being done to echo old horror movies. Jeez, why not make it to echo ROTJ instead, for god's sake? That makeup was horrible and now it seems to me that pretension about homaging old films was behind the awfulness of it. It seems to like Lucas had a whole collection of reasons for doing what I'd call deliberately going out of his to make the prequels bad movies. It didn't need to be that way.

So no, it was in no way inevitable that the prequels be awful movies the way they were. That was something that took effort.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

EyeShotFirst said:

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won't last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you'll be able to project it on a 20' by 40' screen with perfect quality. I think it's the director's prerogative, not the studio's to go back and reinvent a movie."

Chilling quote, isn't it? To me, it's like a fucking declaration of war against fans of the originals.

Well, George, if the SE is only edition available I will not buy it and I will not watch it. If I can't watch the original I will not watch Star Wars. Nor buy Star Wars things -no funding the empire from me, thank you very much.

Author
Time

I am starting to feel bad for Lucas bashing because A. I really don't like talking about people B. It isn't getting anything done because my voice is silent. We ask for the Original Unaltered Trilogy on DVD we get a lossy-Laserdisc transfer that plays in our DVD players. When I think of Star Wars, I think of being 5 years old in my parents' basement during weekends watching them on VHS. I remember how fun it was to relax on the carpet in front of an old 26'' Zenith floor model television and thinking that those were the best films of all time. Why now when I think of Star Wars I think that I am being defecated on. When I think of Blade Runner I think wow Ridley Scott loves his fans. But George really doesn't seem to care. I will never ever get to see Star Wars like I originally did. I can type all night about this but really I am just one of the many that miss Star Wars. At least I can stand tall and say I have seen Star Wars. The things people under 16 have seen are just impostors. All I want is to see Star Wars as Star Wars instead of Star Wars Episode 4 A New Hope. I guess we are all just unimportant to George Lucas. There isn't even enough of us to boycott all things Lucasfilm. The petition worked but really didn't work to our advantage.

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas

<span> </span>

Author
Time
 (Edited)

lucas quote " I think it's the director's prerogative, not the studio's to go back and reinvent a movie."

I bolded and inderlined the important part.

See this is pretty much the proof that during the making of the special edition he set out to reboot the universe from scratch even without reshooting the original trilogy.

Star Wars 1977 did not need to be reinvented it was a masterpiece and a near perfect movie, the genius editing and score made do with what little budget lucas had at the time to tell a narrative that was free of cynicism and was a purely joyful experience to watch, and just a good amount of fun.

Why change a film that everyone loved for generations, well anybody but Lucas that is.

How nuts is it to make a film that changed cinema, brought back fun to the movies and think it is shit.  It is crazy to hate something that you yourself made that resonated with generations of the young and old.  Was star wars just a happy mistake for its fans and an unhappy moment in time for george?

 

He had every right to recompose his universe and characters, it was even somewhat interesting hearing how lucas was going to mold and shape all six films into a grand cohesive saga, the idea and the execution of said idea are different though because it was rendered poorly, his metaphor or story was confusingly put on film and video and made less sense than it did as an idea.

I have no problems as long as Lucas who claims he champions historical film preservation has the originals preserved for all time, as he said as an artifact of how it was but not how he wanted it.

I have always championed Lucas as a genius and stood up for him when people have claimed he was a dumb moron and hack, i still think he is a once in a generation genius like Thomas Eddison.

He has nothing to really be ashamed of he made his films on his own terms and he is happy with the finished product, great for him, bad for the fans.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time
skyjedi2005 said:

lucas quote " I think it's the director's prerogative, not the studio's to go back and reinvent a movie."

I bolded and inderlined the important part.

See this is pretty much the proof that during the making of the special edition he set out to reboot the universe from scratch even without reshooting the original trilogy.

Star Wars 1977 did not need to be reinvented it was a masterpiece and a near perfect movie, the genius editing and score made do with what little budget lucas had at the time to tell a narrative that was free of cynicism and was a purely joyful experience to watch, and just a good amount of fun.

Why change a film that everyone loved for generations, well anybody but Lucas that is.

How nuts is it to make a film that changed cinema, brought back fun to the movies and think it is shit.  It is crazy to hate something that you yourself made that resonated with generations of the young and old.  Was star wars just a happy mistake for its fans and an unhappy moment in time for george?

I can't see why he is like that. If I had created something like Star Wars I would be sitting with a fat smile on face and my arms crossed. I would be so proud of myself. Whenever I do something that people love it gives me a high unlike anything. As a musician and an artist I get tickled to death when somebody says wow that's good. If I created something like that I would try my damnedest to preserve it. And to keep it alive for generations to generations. If I created Star Wars I would transmit it to space and say that it actually happened LOL watch out ET. I would want my children to enjoy it the way I enjoyed it. A good film will last forever regardless of if it looks dated or not. Star Wars has this lasting effect. After I watch Star Wars I wanna watch it again and again. I just wish it was treated as well as other timeless classics.

 

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas

<span> </span>

Author
Time
 (Edited)

It is interesting that fans feel as sense of ownership of the star wars mythos, in the same way star trek fans feel a sense of ownership over roddenberry's creation.

To Create something like creates a modern mythology and has that much of a social effect on society is absolutely phenomenal, and has a lasting effect.  Wars like Trek is not a passing fad, they both in their own way speak to people.

Obviously Lucas legally owns star wars 100% and could tell the fans to fuck off if he wanted, hell sometimes artists have to do that as much as they need outside input they also need to not have their vision muddied.

Some of the problems star wars has are due to pandering to some of the fans.  The whole Jango Fett/Boba Fett thing for instance, fans wanted to see mandalorians in the films.

Just like fans wanted a fourth Indiana Jones film then after the fact said they perfered it would have ended with three. Fans that initially wanted a 9 film star wars saga say they wish star wars had died in 1983 with what dignity it had left.

You can't please everyone at once.  Some fans love all six films equally even return of the jedi a much bashed film, as the fan bashing on that is almost as bad as the phantom menace.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time
Vaderisnothayden said:

If Lucas had made prequel films that were true to the spirit of Star Wars, they'd be much better received. The prequel trilogy was always meant to be a bit different in tone, but the one he put out was a whole damn different galaxy away in tone and mentality and that should have been avoided (and could easily have been avoided). A bit more effort to fit in with the story of the originals would have been no harm either.....

So no, it was in no way inevitable that the prequels be awful movies the way they were. That was something that took effort.

I've only seen one of the prequels and none of the SEs, so I have a very limited knowledge of the subject matter.  That said - I'm with VINH on this one. Lucas answers to no one.  The prequels are a textbook example of what happens when there isn't a system of creative checks & balances.

 

Vaderisnothayden, addressing ESF's Lucas quote, said:

Chilling quote, isn't it? To me, it's like a fucking declaration of war against fans of the originals.

He does seem to have a great deal of anger and spite for the very people that made him the billionaire he is.  It's not just lip service either - he acts on it. He's like a child who takes his toys and goes home if the other kids won't play the way he wants to.

Strange.

 

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)
Lucas said:

" I think it's the director's prerogative, not the studio's to go back and reinvent a movie."

That's an interesting quote considering he already had the master story for all twelve, nine, six movies back in the early 70s. 

Oh wait - he didn't.

 

I will say though, at least he's starting to open up about how dishonest he's been the past 30 years.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)

It's worth remembering that he can't be THAT embarrassed by the original versions, since they are available right now and have been since 2006. In fact, I don't even believe he ever really cared about his "vision", changing it was all about making Star Wars attractive to 8 year olds (and very anal adults) and  zip to do with artistic ambition.

Author
Time

I agree 100% with Vaderisnothayden

Never our fault, if TPM (wich was at least had "decent moments" in spirit) or AOTC or ROTS would have been any good, i would love the films, no matter some changes in the universe or the tone of the films. But they are 100%-genuine-crap.

In fact, honest thinking:

"Little Ani" is clearly retarded.

But Anakin from AOTC (that ride on the vegetarian ball-cow) and ROTS ("My Empire!!!!" lol) is far worse. I mean, how would the Council upgrade him? It would have been better (for the films) if they put him in the street, forbidden access to the temple, and that lead him to hating Jedi, etc.

It was very easy to make some decent movies. Not as good as OT, but... even these days, years after PT, it's hard to believe. It took effort to do the things that bad, i agree with that.

Author
Time
 (Edited)
skyjedi2005 said:

It is interesting that fans feel as sense of ownership of the star wars mythos, in the same way star trek fans feel a sense of ownership over roddenberry's creation.

To Create something like creates a modern mythology and has that much of a social effect on society is absolutely phenomenal, and has a lasting effect.  Wars like Trek is not a passing fad, they both in their own way speak to people.

Obviously Lucas legally owns star wars 100% and could tell the fans to fuck off if he wanted, hell sometimes artists have to do that as much as they need outside input they also need to not have their vision muddied.

Some of the problems star wars has are due to pandering to some of the fans.  The whole Jango Fett/Boba Fett thing for instance, fans wanted to see mandalorians in the films.

Just like fans wanted a fourth Indiana Jones film then after the fact said they perfered it would have ended with three. Fans that initially wanted a 9 film star wars saga say they wish star wars had died in 1983 with what dignity it had left.

You can't please everyone at once.  Some fans love all six films equally even return of the jedi a much bashed film, as the fan bashing on that is almost as bad as the phantom menace.

Star Wars is a modern classic. As such, it belongs to the people, not just to Mr Lucas, whatever the legality of it. And Lucas should respect that. It is an outrage that something beloved of millions should be destroyed to satisfy the whims of one man. As for having one's artistic vision muddled, I think Lucas's vision of Star wars is quite plenty muddled as is, without any help from us. And I couldn't care less about Lucas's vision of Star Wars, or at least the vision of the Lucas of the 90s and onwards. It looks to me like his Star Wars "vision" is utterly invalid and crap.

Who knew Indy 4 was going to be second rate? Well, I guess we should have had some idea, seeing as this was coming from Lucas in the post-prequel era. Plus he'd already screwed up Indy with that awful Young Indy show. I liked the idea of seeing Harry Ford back in the hat. As it is, Indy 4 is still much more Indy than the PT is Star Wars and and much better.

And back in the old days I wanted new Star Wars films like most people. I didn't realize Lucas was going to (as I see it) go out of his way to make them bad movies. In retrospect I realize I should have been happy with just 3, but who knew? After the awfulnes of the SE we should have seen the writing on the wall, but before that?

As for ROTJ bashing, that will never fail to bewilder me. ROTJ is a great movie, the equal of the other two, and it has some of the best stuff in the trilogy.

 

Author
Time
Baronlando said:

It's worth remembering that he can't be THAT embarrassed by the original versions, since they are available right now and have been since 2006. In fact, I don't even believe he ever really cared about his "vision", changing it was all about making Star Wars attractive to 8 year olds (and very anal adults) and  zip to do with artistic ambition.

 

 8 year olds whose brains have been sucked out by mind-flayers.

Author
Time

VFP,

I think I get what you mean.  I opened a thread a month or two ago with a similar idea.  Let's see... here it is! http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Prequel-Approval-Ratings-Speculation/topic/10641/

Like you said, after 16 years and lots of EU, there was no way to satisfy all Star Wars fans.  Realizing this is somewhat frustrating... but I think it can also be freeing.  The expression "Well, you can't please all of the people all of the time..." is meant to make you feel better about doing something that some people don't like.  Or, in Lucas's case in the mid 90s, setting out to make something that can't, regardless of your efforts, please everyone.  When faced with the reality you can't please everyone, you have to decide whom you will please.  I suppose poor filmmakers try to please 2 groups:

1) Themselves.

2) Whatever group that will make them the most money, as long as it doesn't extermely compromise group #1.

Lucas had the money to do whatever he wanted... but from a financial perspective, it's hard to say that a "good" prequel trilogy would have made Lucas any more money than the buckets of gold that he's made off of the saga since 1999.

No, I don't think it's our fault.  As I speculated in my post, I think that had the prequels been done well, 80% of us would have been fully satisfied.  As it is, I guess 40% of are... so he really missed the boat there.  The movies ARE terrible.  They are a lodestone around the neck of everything Star Wars.

The sad thing is I think I know myself well enough to think I'd probably be in that cranky 20% that wouldn't have been happy with anything.  There are parts of the EU that I really like- there are a couple things that I really really like, maybe even love.  But I'm a fairly critical fan, and I think I would have been folding my arms and spitting no matter what.  :(

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time
Vaderisnothayden said:

And back in the old days I wanted new Star Wars films like most people. I didn't realize Lucas was going to (as I see it) go out of his way to make them bad movies. In retrospect I realize I should have been happy with just 3, but who knew? After the awfulnes of the SE we should have seen the writing on the wall, but before that?

As for ROTJ bashing, that will never fail to bewilder me. ROTJ is a great movie, the equal of the other two, and it has some of the best stuff in the trilogy.

 

 Some of the best of the trilogy and also some of the worst.  I don't need to go into detail here, but if the SE's were the writing on the wall, RotJ was George walking up to the wall, checking it for writability and considering just what he might put on it.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time
xhonzi said:

 ...if the SE's were the writing on the wall, RotJ was George walking up to the wall, checking it for writability and considering just what he might put on it.

Well put, sir.

As I sat in the theater in 1983, I knew Star Wars and I were parting ways.

 

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)
Vaderisnothayden said:

Indy 4 is still much more Indy than the PT is Star Wars and and much better.

 

That's back to the checks & balances I was mentioning before, which were absent from the SE & Prequel processes.

For Kingdom - Lucas, Spielberg, & Ford forced each other into making a film that was true to the series. It wasn't as serious as Raiders, not as dark as Temple, not as comical as Crusade, but it looked & felt like the world of Indy because there were three people making sure it did - the same three people who had been involved in the other three films.

Spielberg said no when Lucas wanted it to lean more science fiction - Lucas said no when Spielberg wanted scenes like a ricochet bullet hitting someone's belt and causing their pants to fall down (honestly, that's the sort of bullshit from a Mel Brooks movie - lame).  Add in Ford as a third voice further honing the story and we got a film that fits with the others.

That creative process was completely absent from the Star Wars franchise the past twenty years and it really shows. The only prequel I saw (Phantom) stopped resembling Star Wars as soon as the crawl faded.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
xhonzi said:
Vaderisnothayden said:

And back in the old days I wanted new Star Wars films like most people. I didn't realize Lucas was going to (as I see it) go out of his way to make them bad movies. In retrospect I realize I should have been happy with just 3, but who knew? After the awfulnes of the SE we should have seen the writing on the wall, but before that?

As for ROTJ bashing, that will never fail to bewilder me. ROTJ is a great movie, the equal of the other two, and it has some of the best stuff in the trilogy.

 

 Some of the best of the trilogy and also some of the worst.  I don't need to go into detail here, but if the SE's were the writing on the wall, RotJ was George walking up to the wall, checking it for writability and considering just what he might put on it.

I don't see that. There was nothing seriously wrong in ROTJ and nothing that didn't work as Star Wars. It was a satisfying conclusion to the trilogy. Whereas the SE was a blatant betrayal of Star Wars. There's no comparison.

 

Author
Time

I am an RotJ fan.  On the whole, I like it and I think it's one of the few series ending movies that actually works for me.  That is to say, I think it delivers on the main "promises" made by the preceding movies.  The Luke/Vader scenes at the end are near perfect, in my opinion.  The space battle at the end has yet to be matched or surpassed in terms of complexity and excitement.

HOWEVER (and I know there are whole threads dedicated to it, so I won't go into much detail):

The burping?  The Tarzan yell? 

The Ewok's cuteness factor and makretability seemed to be weighed higher than their believability or story relevance.

The aliens in Jabba's place seem to be "cuter" than their Cantina equivalents.

And most importantly, Han and Leia seem to be less three dimensional than their ESB selves.  This can be blamed on the actors (Ford, primarily) but I think it was a sign of the story and style over characters problem that Lucas seemed to be developing.

I guess these are top of the list to me.  Like I said, I actually like RotJ a lot.  I have a hard time chosing between it and ANH for 2nd best of the trilogy.  But I still think it bears the signs that Lucas was starting to make movies for his 3 year old daughter as opposed to his 18 year old self.

 

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

I still contend the whole idea of the Prequels was a letdown waiting to happen for many reasons:

1.  No Luke, Leia, and Han.  Sorry guys but characters drive movies, characters connect with the audience, there was no way any of us were going to love these movies because they were missing the big 3 from the OT.

2.  The more movies in a series, the more they suck.  The Rocky series started getting ridiculous by Rocky IV, Superman series by Superman III, some will even say the Matrix by the second movie.  How about Lethal Weapon IV, what a piece of crap, same director Richard Donner.  Oh, and that Godfather III debacle.

3.  The Prequels restrict storytelling.  The one thing great about the OT when watching it for the first time is you never know where it is going to take you.  Lucas could take the story wherever he wanted (eventually making Vader Lukes father).  With the prequels, everytime he tried to go somewhere new, he had to keep with the basic outline of how everyone ends up in Episode IV.  And even then he contradicted himself!

4.  Lucas is past his prime.  When was the last time Coppola made a great movie?  Or William Friedken?  Or Brian Depalma?  Does anyone remember Eyes Wide Shut as Stanley Kubricks last movie?  These were all great directors in the 70's, and they all had their run in the 70's, and in the 80's, but I can't think of a great movie any of them made by the late 90's.

5.  Everything eventually loses that magic.  Even great TV shows lose that 'it', as many movie series do somewhere along the line.  Return of the Jedi is a good movie that ends the Trilogy well, IMO, but it does lack that spark of Star Wars and Empire, and it is just so hard to recapture movie magic, that is why classics, are just that, they are come around every so often.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Personally, I think the number one problem with the prequels is that Lucas didn't hand over the project to a new generation of writers and directors. There were so many talented up-and-coming names mentioned in the 90s that would undoubtedly have done something infinitely better than what we got.

Whenever I think about the prequels, I think about all the super-talented and creative artists and technicians who grew on the Star Wars films and studied and worked their whole lives to grow up and live the dream working at ILM and Lucasfilm on producing new Star Wars films. Then they all ended up being trapped having to work on garbage. I wonder how many of them were working on the films and thinking to themselves, "This stuff is horrible," but  they couldn't do anything about it because they knew they wouldn't be able to get through to George anyway and they didn't want to rock the boat for fear of losing their jobs. I just wish he had handed over the reins to the next generation of filmmakers, who were the equivalent of who he was in '75.

I know the magic of the original series could never be recaptured, but the prequels (or whatever new films) still could have been something special. Unfortunately, what they ended up with was a gaping black hole of wasted opportunity.

Author
Time
neebis said:

Personally, I think the number one problem with the prequels is that Lucas didn't hand over the project to a new generation of writers and directors. There were so many talented up-and-coming names mentioned in the 90s that would undoubtedly have done something infinitely better than what we got.

Whenever I think about the prequels, I think about all the super-talented and creative artists and technicians who grew on the Star Wars films and studied and worked their whole lives to grow up and live the dream working at ILM and Lucasfilm on producing new Star Wars films. Then they all ended up being trapped having to work on garbage. I wonder how many of them were working on the films and thinking to themselves, "This stuff is horrible," but  they couldn't do anything about it because they knew they wouldn't be able to get through to George anyway and they didn't want to rock the boat for fear of losing their jobs. I just wish he had handed over the reins to the next generation of filmmakers, who were the equivalent of who he was in '75.

I know the magic of the original series could never be recaptured, but the prequels (or whatever new films) still could have been something special. Unfortunately, what they ended up with was a gaping black hole of wasted opportunity.

It was basically a first draft of a screenplay in my eyes. George whipped together a screenplay and didn't even bother to listen to the paper clip. I feel the films could have been something. The Phantom Menace had just a hint of that. But really it is sad to say that the Star Wars film that ended the fans love ended up being the best of the 3. Really I think the star wars saga works better if you change episode 4,5,and 6 to episode 1,2, and 3 you no longer have the problem. That is why I am waiting for ChainsawAsh's edits because to me they will be the Star Wars saga. If Ady is able to make the prequels better I will probably tear up and cheer. I am not saying I am as good as Ady but I have a notebook full of possible prequel changes some impossible and I just can't get them to work. Fan Editing could save them but I can't. I have a love for Star Wars and I have been a fan since way before special editions or prequels and I can't find a single way to save them. My best idea turns them into an un-soggy shit sandwhich. I guess the best thing to do is what many of the older members like anchorhead do and just forget they even exist. To me and to many others the last Star Wars movie was ROTJ. I tried to defend them. But I cannot any longer.

 

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas

<span> </span>