logo Sign In

Naked Parties — Page 2

Author
Time
Post link
Let me just say that you guys give me more to worry about for the future than anyone who attends naked keggers.

It's interesting that you have noticed that educated people tend to become "liberals", yet you just assume that's because the cirriculum was lacking.

http://revwhitewolf.bravehost.com/images/headupyourass.jpg
Your focus determines your reality.
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Go-Mer-Tonic
Let me just say that you guys give me more to worry about for the future than anyone who attends naked keggers.

That's funny.....cuz most people here think the same thing about you. So why don't you just ignore us 'till you go away.

It's interesting that you have noticed that educated people tend to become "liberals", yet you just assume that's because the cirriculum was lacking.


The CURRICULUM must have been lacking to have turned out people who claim they are educated, but are essentially clueless since their solutions to real world problems lack any solid foundation of common sense. Take your silly comments in the Global Warming thread as an example, Gomer. I rest my case.

http://revwhitewolf.bravehost.com/images/headupyourass.jpg


Awwww.....are we having a problem with our picture???

BTW....has anyone checked out my sig? Great, isn't it???
Author
Time
Post link
Thanks for respoting that pic for me.
Your focus determines your reality.
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Go-Mer-Tonic
Thanks for respoting that pic for me.


What the fuck is respoting??? If you mean reposting....all I see is a "image not allowed" pic.

I don't think I helped ya out there, Gomer. Can't say it breaks my heart either....



Author
Time
Post link
You should see it, it's a photoshopped picture of a guy in a suit with his head in his ass.
Your focus determines your reality.
Author
Time
Post link
I'm sure I've seen it before.

Don't pat yourself on the back too much for finding it.
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Go-Mer-Tonic
the cirriculum was lacking.


I rubbed the irony all over my body.

Harrison Ford Has Pretty Much Given Up on His Son. Here's Why

Author
Time
Post link
I was hoping someone would appreciate that.
Your focus determines your reality.
Author
Time
Post link
What do liberals in the US stand for? What do they want? Why do most people here don't like liberals?
I'm asking this because I'm a bit confused and I think it is because being a liberal in the Netherlands is something different than being a liberal in the US.
Fez: I am so excited about Star Whores.
Hyde: Fezzy, man, it's Star Wars.
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Go-Mer-Tonic
I was hoping someone would appreciate that.

walks right up to Gomer and gives him a quick lookover, then takes a step back, looks Gomer in the eye and says...

Dork.

What do liberals in the US stand for? What do they want? Why do most people here don't like liberals?


Liberals in America are of the annoying subspecies of liberal. See...not all liberals are bad and liberalism is not a bad thing unto itself. It's the nimrod dipshits who populate our country and call themselves liberal....they are what has ruined liberalism across the board.

If you would like any evidence....simply look at everything Gomer writes. I rest my case.
Author
Time
Post link
I'm not a liberal.

I have a unique point of view unto myself.
Your focus determines your reality.
Author
Time
Post link
What do liberals in the US stand for? What do they want? Why do most people here don't like liberals?

Liberals in America are of the annoying subspecies of liberal. See...not all liberals are bad and liberalism is not a bad thing unto itself. It's the nimrod dipshits who populate our country and call themselves liberal....they are what has ruined liberalism across the board.

If you would like any evidence....simply look at everything Gomer writes. I rest my case.


A "liberal" in the Netherlands is someone who supports privatizing government controlled sectors like public transport, postall services, communication, health care, etc. They believe a free marked is better than a government controlled marked. The fundamental idea is the freedom of the individual. They want to keep taxes low. Stuff like that.
Ronald Reagen was considered a true liberal.
Is this "definition" of a liberal generally the same in the US?

Liberals in America are of the annoying subspecies of liberal.
So when you speak of liberal s you don't mean a liberal?
Fez: I am so excited about Star Whores.
Hyde: Fezzy, man, it's Star Wars.
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Go-Mer-Tonic
I'm not a liberal.

I have a unique point of view unto myself.


Sounds like you're in your own little world to me....explains a lot.

Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Arnie.d

Is this "definition" of a liberal generally the same in the US?


No, Reagan was considered a Conservative in the US.

Liberals typically support drastic increases in spending associated with government social programs (such as welfare) which give way to higher taxes. They’ve typically spent less on the military and tend to support more diplomatic approaches to resolving international conflicts. Conservatives favor less government intervention and a stauncher stance on the preservation of personal liberty (however, issues such as abortion and gay marriage fall into the shades of gray separating the opposing sides of this notion.) Conservatives are typically both financially and socially conservative and have thus been slow on "righting" (or have perpetuated ) social wrongs (segregation, civil rights infractions, etc.) On the other side of the ridiculous political coin, while they have supported and changed appalling social practices (integrating the Southern social infrastructure, sending the Jim Crow Laws packing, doing away with slavery, etc.) Liberals have typically demonstrated an inability to differentiate between "Change" and "Progress." They have, in recent times, drastically overcompensated. Social programs like welfare have become bloated and far too easy to abuse, affirmative action has in a sense re-legalized racial discrimination, etc.

It gets confusing when you throw in the two Parties. Republicans are typically considered "Conservative" these days, but our current President has spent record amounts on government programs and hasn't really done anything special to protect vital personal liberties (those on the left will say legislation such as the Patriot Act have done completely the opposite and have irreparably damaged the rights of the American citizenry, those on the right will tell you in special circumstances like wartime such infractions on personal liberty are necessary.) I would say Bush is anything but a true Conservative (some would disagree.)

Lincoln, the most famous Republican, was wildly socially progressive (something today that is almost entirely associated with the Democrats) during his tenure (abolishing slavery, suspending Habeas Corpus, not "punishing" the Confederacy after the Civil War, etc.)

During of the first half of the 20th century (and slightly beyond) white Southern Democrats (sometimes called Dixiecrats) were both Democrats and extremely conservative. Later, they completely shifted over to the Republican Party (look at Strom Thurmond’s tenure in the Senate for a nice, encapsulated look at the shift of the Part lines during that period.)

Harrison Ford Has Pretty Much Given Up on His Son. Here's Why

Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Stinky-Dinkins
Originally posted by: Arnie.d

Is this "definition" of a liberal generally the same in the US?


No, Reagan was considered a Conservative in the US.

Liberals typically support drastic increases in spending associated with government social programs (such as welfare) which give way to higher taxes. They’ve typically spent less on the military and tend to support more diplomatic approaches to resolving international conflicts. Conservatives favor less government intervention and a stauncher stance on the preservation of personal liberty (however, issues such as abortion and gay marriage fall into the shades of gray separating the opposing sides of this notion.) Conservatives are typically both financially and socially conservative and have thus been slow on "righting" (or have perpetuated ) social wrongs (segregation, civil rights infractions, etc.) On the other side of the ridiculous political coin, while they have supported and changed appalling social practices (integrating the Southern social infrastructure, sending the Jim Crow Laws packing, doing away with slavery, etc.) Liberals have typically demonstrated an inability to differentiate between "Change" and "Progress." They have, in recent times, drastically overcompensated. Social programs like welfare have become bloated and far too easy to abuse, affirmative action has in a sense re-legalized racial discrimination, etc.

It gets confusing when you throw in the two Parties. Republicans are typically considered "Conservative" these days, but our current President has spent record amounts on government programs and hasn't really done anything special to protect vital personal liberties (those on the left will say legislation such as the Patriot Act have done completely the opposite and have irreparably damaged the rights of the American citizenry, those on the right will tell you in special circumstances like wartime such infractions on personal liberty are necessary.) I would say Bush is anything but a true Conservative (some would disagree.)

Lincoln, the most famous Republican, was wildly socially progressive (something today that is almost entirely associated with the Democrats) during his tenure (abolishing slavery, suspending Habeas Corpus, not "punishing" the Confederacy after the Civil War, etc.)

During of the first half of the 20th century (and slightly beyond) white Southern Democrats (sometimes called Dixiecrats) were both Democrats and extremely conservative. Later, they completely shifted over to the Republican Party (look at Strom Thurmond’s tenure in the Senate for a nice, encapsulated look at the shift of the Part lines during that period.)


So generally speaking, what I would consider liberal you consider conservative?

Fez: I am so excited about Star Whores.
Hyde: Fezzy, man, it's Star Wars.
Author
Time
Post link
Yeah I'm off in my own little world, just like everyone else is.

I just admit it is all.
Your focus determines your reality.
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Arnie.d
Originally posted by: Stinky-Dinkins
Originally posted by: Arnie.d

Is this "definition" of a liberal generally the same in the US?


No, Reagan was considered a Conservative in the US.

Liberals typically support drastic increases in spending associated with government social programs (such as welfare) which give way to higher taxes. They’ve typically spent less on the military and tend to support more diplomatic approaches to resolving international conflicts. Conservatives favor less government intervention and a stauncher stance on the preservation of personal liberty (however, issues such as abortion and gay marriage fall into the shades of gray separating the opposing sides of this notion.) Conservatives are typically both financially and socially conservative and have thus been slow on "righting" (or have perpetuated ) social wrongs (segregation, civil rights infractions, etc.) On the other side of the ridiculous political coin, while they have supported and changed appalling social practices (integrating the Southern social infrastructure, sending the Jim Crow Laws packing, doing away with slavery, etc.) Liberals have typically demonstrated an inability to differentiate between "Change" and "Progress." They have, in recent times, drastically overcompensated. Social programs like welfare have become bloated and far too easy to abuse, affirmative action has in a sense re-legalized racial discrimination, etc.

It gets confusing when you throw in the two Parties. Republicans are typically considered "Conservative" these days, but our current President has spent record amounts on government programs and hasn't really done anything special to protect vital personal liberties (those on the left will say legislation such as the Patriot Act have done completely the opposite and have irreparably damaged the rights of the American citizenry, those on the right will tell you in special circumstances like wartime such infractions on personal liberty are necessary.) I would say Bush is anything but a true Conservative (some would disagree.)

Lincoln, the most famous Republican, was wildly socially progressive (something today that is almost entirely associated with the Democrats) during his tenure (abolishing slavery, suspending Habeas Corpus, not "punishing" the Confederacy after the Civil War, etc.)

During of the first half of the 20th century (and slightly beyond) white Southern Democrats (sometimes called Dixiecrats) were both Democrats and extremely conservative. Later, they completely shifted over to the Republican Party (look at Strom Thurmond’s tenure in the Senate for a nice, encapsulated look at the shift of the Part lines during that period.)


So generally speaking, what I would consider liberal you consider conservative?


Based on what you wrote, that sounds about right.... but I really have no idea what the political atmosphere is in the Netherlands. I'd say the safest answer is the two affiliations (Conservative, Liberal) are far too different and defined by the unique local political atmosheres of the two countries to really be comparable.

Harrison Ford Has Pretty Much Given Up on His Son. Here's Why

Author
Time
Post link
This is supposed to be a freaking Naked Parties thread. Why are you guys discussing politics?
“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” — Nazi Reich Marshal Hermann Goering
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Stinky-Dinkins
Originally posted by: Arnie.d
Originally posted by: Stinky-Dinkins
Originally posted by: Arnie.d

Is this "definition" of a liberal generally the same in the US?


No, Reagan was considered a Conservative in the US.

Liberals typically support drastic increases in spending associated with government social programs (such as welfare) which give way to higher taxes. They’ve typically spent less on the military and tend to support more diplomatic approaches to resolving international conflicts. Conservatives favor less government intervention and a stauncher stance on the preservation of personal liberty (however, issues such as abortion and gay marriage fall into the shades of gray separating the opposing sides of this notion.) Conservatives are typically both financially and socially conservative and have thus been slow on "righting" (or have perpetuated ) social wrongs (segregation, civil rights infractions, etc.) On the other side of the ridiculous political coin, while they have supported and changed appalling social practices (integrating the Southern social infrastructure, sending the Jim Crow Laws packing, doing away with slavery, etc.) Liberals have typically demonstrated an inability to differentiate between "Change" and "Progress." They have, in recent times, drastically overcompensated. Social programs like welfare have become bloated and far too easy to abuse, affirmative action has in a sense re-legalized racial discrimination, etc.

It gets confusing when you throw in the two Parties. Republicans are typically considered "Conservative" these days, but our current President has spent record amounts on government programs and hasn't really done anything special to protect vital personal liberties (those on the left will say legislation such as the Patriot Act have done completely the opposite and have irreparably damaged the rights of the American citizenry, those on the right will tell you in special circumstances like wartime such infractions on personal liberty are necessary.) I would say Bush is anything but a true Conservative (some would disagree.)

Lincoln, the most famous Republican, was wildly socially progressive (something today that is almost entirely associated with the Democrats) during his tenure (abolishing slavery, suspending Habeas Corpus, not "punishing" the Confederacy after the Civil War, etc.)

During of the first half of the 20th century (and slightly beyond) white Southern Democrats (sometimes called Dixiecrats) were both Democrats and extremely conservative. Later, they completely shifted over to the Republican Party (look at Strom Thurmond’s tenure in the Senate for a nice, encapsulated look at the shift of the Part lines during that period.)


So generally speaking, what I would consider liberal you consider conservative?


Based on what you wrote, that sounds about right.... but I really have no idea what the political atmosphere is in the Netherlands. I'd say the safest answer is the two affiliations (Conservative, Liberal) are far too different and defined by the unique local political atmosheres of the two countries to really be comparable.


I agree. But I understand now why I was confused.

Fez: I am so excited about Star Whores.
Hyde: Fezzy, man, it's Star Wars.
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: ricarleite
This is supposed to be a freaking Naked Parties thread. Why are you guys discussing politics?

No idea. I guess one politics thread is just not enough

Now that I've read the entire thread, are we going to do that naked body scan thing? Are we waiting for Gaffer Tape to post the first pic?

Edit: What happened to the hot.like.C3PX thread? I can't find it.

Fez: I am so excited about Star Whores.
Hyde: Fezzy, man, it's Star Wars.
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Go-Mer-Tonic
I'm not a liberal.

I have a unique point of view unto myself.


So in other words, you're an independent?

Do you know what independent means?

It means "I don't know a damn thing about politics, and I don't care."

http://i.imgur.com/7N84TM8.jpg

Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Nanner Split,br.
So in other words, you're an independent?

Do you know what independent means?

It means "I don't know a damn thing about politics, and I don't care."


Some of us don't feel it necessary to pick the prettier of the two piles of shit. Both Democrat and Republican politicians are members of an aristocratic class of Americans whose primary function is to STEAL money from Americans who are not members of their social class. One third of my life will be lived in the servitude of this class of aristocrats (see paycheck). If I choose to refuse this requirement of servitude, I will be thrown in prison. Any American who is not a member of this aristocratic class, but swears allegiance to it, is either very young or very foolish. Our government is a wildly out of control bureaucracy which long ago abandoned our Constitution and Declaration of Independence. If anything, an independent is more likely to know more, and care more about politics.

HARMY RULES

Author
Time
Post link
To me being partisan means: I don't know know everything about politics, so I'm going with these guys.
Your focus determines your reality.
Author
Time
Post link
I personally have a Libertarian view. People should be able to do what they want if it doesn't hurt anyone.