- Time
- Post link
I’m not discussing the PT, I’m saying being pretentious is not indicative of intelligence.
Ah. Teaching by demonstration.
Ceci n’est pas une signature.
Most telling SE moment — Page 3
- Time
- Post link
You don’t need “scientific fact” to prove that a real tree looks more real than a cartoon one.
Similarly, you don’t need “scientific fact” to tell that the speeder chase in ROTJ looked crap when it came out and looks crap to this day. Just because something has a nostalgic value to you it doesn’t make it better.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
So the cartoon background, cartoon pod racers and cartoon dust cloud of TPM look more real than the real trees, the real actors and the real props of Jedi?
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
Proving my point by being childish really doesn’t help you.
I never said all the SFX in TPM was better, I was saying that one shot was better than all the crappy greenscreening ROTJ is infamous for.
Real =/= better.
Circle jerking about it doesn’t make it true.
The greenscreens in ESB are convincing, the ones in ROTJ are not; this isn’t even a prequel debate, or a CGI one.
Also as a side note, those pods and the background in that scene are real, physical objects.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
Real =/= better.
From a technical standpoint the screenshot of TPM looks more real than that of ROTJ, which is ultimately what the filmmakers were aiming for: amazing special effects that felt real.
Sounds reasonable. (Frink, am I doing this right?)
Also as a side note, those pods and the background in that scene are real, physical objects.
And they did their very best to hide that fact.
Ceci n’est pas une signature.
- Time
- Post link
Circle jerking about it doesn’t make it true.
Definitely angling for that taxes thread now.
- Time
- Post link
“You don’t need “scientific fact” to prove that a real tree looks more real than a cartoon one.”
“Real =/= better.”
I’m sorry, what were you saying?
- Time
- Post link
Look, I usually don’t resort to ad hominem attacks, but are you intentionally trying to sound retarded?
Obviously those two uses of ‘real’ are different. In the most recent instance I used “real” to refer to practical effects, in the latter I meant the literal translation.
Twisting my words also doesn’t help you.
- Time
- Post link
Look, I usually don’t resort to ad hominem attacks, but are you intentionally trying to sound retarded?
Oh you lovely human being.
Ceci n’est pas une signature.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
are you intentionally trying to sound retarded?
Just what this forum needs, yet another asshole.
- Time
- Post link
Look, I usually don’t resort to ad hominem attacks, but are you intentionally trying to sound retarded?
Oh you lovely human being.
Deflecting because you can’t answer my question, noice.
- Time
- Post link
Being a pretentious ass isn’t helping you. You can’t be objective with subjective material, to quote you, that’s “retarded”.
- Time
- Post link
Being a pretentious ass isn’t helping you. You can’t be objective with subjective material, to quote you, that’s “retarded”.
And thinking you’re enlightened by claiming “everything is subjective” just makes you look ridiculous.
- Time
- Post link
Look, I usually don’t resort to ad hominem attacks, but are you intentionally trying to sound retarded?
Oh you lovely human being.
Deflecting because you can’t answer my question, noice.
It’s a nonsense question, retard.
- Time
- Post link
Look, I usually don’t resort to ad hominem attacks, but are you intentionally trying to sound retarded?
Oh you lovely human being.
Deflecting because you can’t answer my question, noice.
There’s no point in answering your question when you’re being an insulting ass.
- Time
- Post link
Being a pretentious ass isn’t helping you. You can’t be objective with subjective material, to quote you, that’s “retarded”.
And thinking you’re enlightened by claiming “everything is subjective” just makes you look ridiculous.
And thinking you’re enlightened by claiming your opinion is objective is even more so.
- Time
- Post link
Look, I usually don’t resort to ad hominem attacks, but are you intentionally trying to sound retarded?
Oh you lovely human being.
Deflecting because you can’t answer my question, noice.
It’s a nonsense question, retard.
EVERYONE USING “RETARD” AS A PEJORATIVE SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Seriously.
- Time
- Post link
No, you’re just immature and can’t accept that while a whole product (TPM) may not be better than another (ROTJ), there are aspects that can be.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
No, you’re just immature
Said the guy using “retard” as an insult.
- Time
- Post link
No, you’re just immature
Said the guy using “retard” as an insult.
Literally all you do is go around these forums insulting people.
- Time
- Post link
This thread is now the "Most telling moment about new people at ot.com" thread.
- Time
- Post link
No, you’re just immature
Said the guy using “retard” as an insult.
Literally all you do is go around these forums insulting people.
This is literally not true, as I do plenty of other things.
And I insult people for being assholes, like you. I don’t insult a whole group of people that can’t defend themselves.
- Time
- Post link
This thread is now the "Most telling moment about new people at ot.com" thread.
I’m not ‘new’, but I guess because you’ve been here a few more years shitposting nonsense you’re automatically better
- Time
- Post link
Look, I usually don’t resort to ad hominem attacks, but are you intentionally trying to sound retarded?
Oh you lovely human being.
Deflecting because you can’t answer my question, noice.
It’s a nonsense question, retard.
EVERYONE USING “RETARD” AS A PEJORATIVE SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Seriously.
I was just giving back to him what he was dishing out, you don’t have to get upset about it.
- Time
- Post link
This thread is now the "Most telling moment about new people at ot.com" thread.
I’m not ‘new’, but I guess because you’ve been here a few more years shitposting nonsense you’re automatically better
No, I’m better for other reasons.