Sign In

Modern SE Revisionism — Page 3

Author
Time

I’m generally against the ignore feature because I think it’s silly, but when a certain person only posts the same thing over and over, it might not be so silly.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

when a certain person only posts the same thing over and over, it might not be so silly.

You mean like the ones opening threads about “what if the PT blablabla”, “what would you have done blablabla”, and every single comment made about how bad is AOTC and the PT in general ? And the one always saying he does not like anime and the EU ?

Author
Time

MalàStrana said:

TV’s Frink said:

when a certain person only posts the same thing over and over, it might not be so silly.

You mean like the ones opening threads about “what if the PT blablabla”, “what would you have done blablabla”,

I make threads like those?

and every single comment made about how bad is AOTC and the PT in general ?

They’re objectively bad and 99% of us here understand it, but the remaining 1% need help if they’re ever going to recover.

And the one always saying he does not like anime and the EU ?

I never said I don’t like anime. As a scientist, I merely report on the objective terribleness of anime.

I never said I don’t like the EU, I said I don’t care about the EU.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

To try and get this much overlooked and informative thread updated and back on track - in highlighting further examples of modern Special Edition revisionism - that has been espoused by Lucasfilm for far, far too long…

 
 

“All wings report in! Watch Star Wars: A New Hope’s iconic Death Star trench run scene take shape from concept to final. Stream the movie now on #DisneyPlus.”

^ https://twitter.com/starwars/status/1199326946825515008 (with a 2-minute animated gif included in the link)
 

with a spot-on reply from doubleofive…
 

“That’s not… you can’t… just show the original concept art then jump ahead to effects made 20 years later.”

^ https://twitter.com/StarWarsVisComp/status/1199330190792499200

 
 

Category Number 37: the ‘Buyer Beware: Lucasfilm authorised / released material indicating a certain era or time - may well contain Special Edition content inserted into it.’ section of the George Lucas: Unreliable Narrator & Time Travelling Revisionist… thread also has couple of examples of ‘modern Special Edition revisionism’ (as well as some other similar categories of interest too…)

 
 

digitalfreaknyc’s Star Wars Insider celebrates the 40th anniversary with… thread also highlights some more of the modern Special Edition revisionism taking place…

 
 

Anyone know of any more examples of this continuing trend by Lucasfilm (or Disney)? Please list them up in here if so… 😃
 

originaltrilogy.com Moderator

I find that answer vague and unconvincing. Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves?
Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? And say something righteous and hopeful for a change?