
- Time
- Post link
I think the really ironic part is that a billionaire is so concerned with a few thousand dollars in lost revenue.
I have to say personally I find this situation quite ironic. Lucas being deprived of something he feels he has a right to by the law which says he doesn't own it, sound familiar?Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:
If Lucas hires someone to design something for him, and that person designs it as a term of his employment, then whether or not Lucas designed it, he owns the design. I'm no fan of Lucas, but in this case I think he has every right to protect the designs that are so integral to his product line.
Original Trilogy in Replica Technicolor Project
Star Wars PAL LaserDisc Project
I think the really ironic part is that a billionaire is so concerned with a few thousand dollars in lost revenue.
zombie84 wrote: I think the really ironic part is that a billionaire is so concerned with a few thousand dollars in lost revenue.
There are 3D printers on the horizon which will wipe out the toy revenue stream, unless laws are put in place and enforced.
none said:
zombie84 wrote: I think the really ironic part is that a billionaire is so concerned with a few thousand dollars in lost revenue.
There are 3D printers on the horizon which will wipe out the toy revenue stream, unless laws are put in place and enforced.
And even then... I mean, it's the music/movie situation, all over again.
The laws are there, Lucas just shot himself in the foot because he never made up a contract whereby he would retain ownership of the work. Whenever someone makes a deal for a film it comes with a contract--when I worked in the camera department I had to fill out a 10-page deal memo every time I joined a crew. If you go under the table like Lucas did, you void any rights you could have demanded the employee give you. Lucas obviously didn't care at the time, because he couldn't forsee the film being successful firstly and prop replicas becoming a market secondly; the trade off, though, is that if the film is so successful that this becomes a market then it means you are making a million dollars on a hundred other things, so its all peanuts anyway. The cost of Lucasfilm's legal suit is probably more than this single man would have made in profit anyway.
I think he was trying to close that loophole but in doing so potentially opened another.
As posted earlier the UK ruling wasn't based on the verbal contract or any perceived design credit, it was based on the designs being seen as Industrial and therefore bound for 15 years only.
And that opens up the possibility of lots of people making merchandise in the UK and using the channel islands to send them all around the world, undermining the cashcows of many 'franchise' holders.
I'm surprised these were determined to be industrial. I think even the most pissed-off OT fan would say there is significant artistic content in the helmets.
"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars
They were designed to serve an industrial process (the film business is an industry).
The object isn't the film but it is created to make the film possible.
However such objects can have aesthetic qualities.
People often have industrial objects in their home without using them for the purpose they were designed for as objet d'art (spinning wheels, antique telescopes, orreries, tribal objects, religious items when the owner doesn't follow that faith) just because they look interesting.
Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:
I'm surprised these were determined to be industrial. I think even the most pissed-off OT fan would say there is significant artistic content in the helmets.
There is also an "aesthetic content" in porn, and that's also called an industry ;)
twooffour said:
Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:
I'm surprised these were determined to be industrial. I think even the most pissed-off OT fan would say there is significant artistic content in the helmets.
There is also an "aesthetic content" in porn, and that's also called an industry ;)
WRONG HELMETS!
And yet so right...
http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-repair-a-Bugaboo-Pram-with-3D-Printing/
Pram connoisseurs out there will know that the Bugaboo is by far the best pram on the market for style, function, ergonomics and collapse ability, unfortunately they are also very expensive to buy and even more expensive to repair, until now....
With the increased accessibility of high quality 3D printing thanks to Shapeways , you can get your Bugaboo back on the road for $25, not bad considering I was quoted $250 for a repair.....
Following is a step by step guide to repairing the handle lock, without which the pram is near useless.
I 3D printed my replacement parts in stainless steel using Shapeways, you could try ABS and do it much cheaper but I really recommend stainless steel.
via: boingboing.net
In which the helmet maker in question demonstrates making a helmet
INv8r_ZIM said:
No, and no amount of nerd rage is going to make this a David and Gloiath story as the media and some blinkered fanboys would love to see this. Ainsworth is a vacu-former, who made landscape pond liners. He was hired to vacuform the TK lids from the sculpture Liz Moore created (this came to light when Brian Muir came out with some info on the RPF boards after the first ruling). Ainsworth WAITED until she had DIED to try and claim that he alone sculpted the helmet. He has further claimed over the last few years that he designed around 200(!) characters in ANH; that LFL just told him to make whatever, and they threw it into the film. He claims that all he was given was a copy of 2" sketch of the whole character, but "that was enough for me(sic)." The art leads on the film do not recall ever having spoken to him. He was a tech responsible for reproducing the helmet en masse, not an artist or designer.
The judge who ruled on the case did not decide for Ainsworth. Rather, he said Ainsworth's story kept changing, was faintly absurd and overall not credible. However under UK law the judge ruled that the design fell under industrial design (which carries a 15 year max copyright) and not a work of art. The ruling was not that Ainsworth was the creator or owner, but that the copyright had expired, and anyone could produce and sell within the UK. LFL has won the right to pursue for damages on product sold in the US from the Uk court, and we'll see if they persue that option.
Ainsworth has been utterly unable to demonstrate that he can convincingly sculpt anything, producing absurdly clumsy sculpts in an attempt to give his case some credibility. It has FURTHER been pretty clearly shown that what he has, which he is passing off as his original ANH molds, is a recast of pieces of a RotJ suit, and a recast of an inaccurate fan-made helmet. His molds are so far from ANH screen accurate, let alone original, that when new details came to light very recently about the teardrop indents, he frantically requested pictures from people so he could ADD THOSE DETAILS TO HIS SUPPOSEDLY ORIGINAL MOLDS.
There's more, much more, but understand that this guy is a lying sack of crap, and a psychopath, willing to say and do anything, including taking credit from an artist who cannot respond, and above all of THAT who does not even have any better pieces than your average ebay seller, but charges vastly more. No matter what your feelings about LFL they are CLEARLY in the right in this case, not Ainsworth who is a common recaster trying to pass off his crap as something it demonstrateably cannot be, and not some heroic artist taking on "the man".
This.
Keep Circulating the Tapes.
END OF LINE
(It hasn’t happened yet)
Is that two borderline racist posts from twooffour in as many days? Take care not to look like a duck, twooffour - we already know you walk like one ;)
Racism is one of those words that shouldn't be devalued whenever you feel like it.
A white Russian walks into a bar. "What's it to be?" "A Black Russian, please." "Coming up!"
Now chill.