logo Sign In

Last movie seen — Page 208

Author
Time

Bingo "I hate show tunes" wings:
I've never met anyone too old for time travel.

Unless you're Dur, apparently.

This is what I meant:

When I got the DVDs a while back, I was watching some of the BTS stuff, and enjoyed the Bobs talking about where the ideas came from.  Gale said that the genesis for him was looking at his parents' High School yearbooks and realizing that they were once teenagers and had their own High School experiences.  As he looked at the pictures, he wondered if he could have even been friends with his parents, or if they would have settled into different cliques.

I find that the first movie works best for me on that level now... the teen who meets his parents as teens... but for my son it works best on this level:

TIME TRAVEL IS COOL!

I still (a little past 28, but regardless) think that time travel is cool and all... but the movie means a lot more to me now than it did then.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

Watched some documentary about dirt, titled "Dirt."

 

Author
Time

FanFiltration said:

"Kingdom of Heaven" Director's Cut

 A perfect epic on par with LoA.

10/10

Yes. One of the best films of the past 20 years. Staggeringly good, so much so that you question just how a major studio financed it.

I need to re-watch Robin Hood, though it was flawed it had a bit of the KOH flavor and I loved it. Can't Ridley keep doing historical films from time to time? ;)

 

I arreust yeu in ze neume of ze leuw!

The Pink Panther

The one that started it all. A light romp of a travelogue comedy, meant as a David Niven starring vehicle. However, they cast Peter in the smaller comic role and that was it. It's a bit creaky in places but always always always charms.

4 balls out of 4.

A Shot in the Dark

The film that cemented the character. The film that gave us the mad Dreyfus and the loyal attacking manservant Kato. The one with the nudist colony. The one with endless quotable lines. The most focused of all the films and one of the great comedies.

4 balls out of 4. Masterpiece. If you have never seen this film you owe it to yourself to do so IMMEDIATELY.

Return of the Pink Panther

More of a collection of gags and scenes than a true story, but welcome just for more of the Inspector. Sometimes it plays well, other times it doesn't. Originally intended as a TV series pilot. Perhaps the budget wasn't very much then. Christopher Plummer works well, but Niv is sorely missed.

3 stars out of 4.

The Pink Panther Strikes Again

Manic, Zany, Screwball, Sheer. Total. Fun. The best of the 70's films has both the silliness and the straightforward plotting that the series usually chose one or the other of. I still don't see the reasoning for dropping the 20 minutes of material.

4 stars out of 4.

I recently acquired these four on LD, and was very curious as to how they would shape up. The first film is from a slightly worn print with cue changeovers but with good color. The mono soundtrack is very rich and the exact same one used on the DVD but uncompressed. (Has the exact same inherent hiss.) Shot fares better with a cleaner print source and similarly uncompressed mono track. (Great since the score has never been released.)

Return is the only one not controlled by MGM and had two separate LD and DVD issues. The fist LD is supposedly not very good, and the remastered version looks quite good with clear sound (with an unfortunate slight hum throughout). The initial DVD was this same LD version ported non-anamorphic and not very pretty. The Universal reissue makes a clean presentation of the original master with nice visible grain, solid color and the same mono track (with that same inherent hum!)

Strikes Again looks the best out of both formats..almost..with clear LD audio. However all the MGM DVDs feature a lack of grain that is especially obvious when seeing the Universal version of Return.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time

captainsolo said:

A Shot in the Dark

The film that cemented the character. The film that gave us the mad Dreyfus and the loyal attacking manservant Kato. The one with the nudist colony. The one with endless quotable lines. The most focused of all the films and one of the great comedies.

4 balls out of 4. Masterpiece. If you have never seen this film you owe it to yourself to do so IMMEDIATELY.

And written by William Peter Blatty no less.

Author
Time

Moneyball.

 

I'm a big baseball fan.  I'm a big sports fan.  But for some reason, I rarely like sports movies.  And I almost never like bio pics.  This was more entertaining than most I've seen, but still it was just kind of meh.  I don't quite get why it was nominated so heavily.  And it was too long, especially all the time and drama spent on the win streak, which they treated like it was the World Series or something.

I also felt bad for Art Howe.  They made him into the villain, because they needed one apparently.  I also found it telling that Paul DePodesta would not let them use his name.

2.5 WARs out of 5 BABIPs.

Author
Time

Sound of my voice.

2 Balls.

It gets interesting and then just stops..

Author
Time

I think the only sports movie I have ever liked was The Sandlot. And that's mainly because it was less about baseball and more about kids bonding over misadventures. Sports movies have never worked for me once I became an adult.

(Shaolin Soccer doesn't count.)

Author
Time

I forgot to mention that I really liked the book.

Author
Time

Sports movies generally feel very cliched.  However, there is one that really stands out to me: Miracle, starring Kurt Russell.  Compared to most "based on a true story" films, this one is actually very, very accurate, at least as far as how the games played out.  It captures the feeling of the era of US/Soviet rivalry, the excitement of a realistic hockey game (they taught hockey players how to act, rather than teaching actors how to play hockey, and it shows), and it carries some fine drama with it.  Most sports movies are meant to inspire, but to me they fall short.  This one did not.

Author
Time

zombie84 said:

I think the only sports movie I have ever liked was The Sandlot. And that's mainly because it was less about baseball and more about kids bonding over misadventures. Sports movies have never worked for me once I became an adult.

(Shaolin Soccer doesn't count.)

I agree. It reminds me of my childhood in some ways, even though I wasn't alive in the 60's. T

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas

<span> </span>

Author
Time

The problem with sports movies is the titles usually give away what happen. "The Team That Won The Important Game: The Movie: Based On The Amazing True Story".


WILL THEY WIN?!

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Revenge of the Pink Panther

A confused little movie that has a rather uninspired plot. Yet the gags are enough to keep us entertained for the runtime and Peter is always fascinating.

3 balls out of 4 horrendous Balls costumes

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time
 (Edited)

xhonzi said:

Bingo "I hate show tunes" wings:
I've never met anyone too old for time travel.


Unless you're Dur, apparently.


I like time travel, provided it makes some lick of sense (and incorporates parallel universes into it's method of operation).

---

The People Under the Stairs (1991)

Had I never seen Twin Peaks, I probably wouldn't have enjoyed this film as much as I did.

Holes (2003)

I've never read the book, so I don't know how this movie compares to it. What I saw, though, I enjoyed immensely, so I can't see it being too much better. Jon Voight was ridiculous (in a good way) Sigourney Weaver was dangerously sexy (and I don't usually find her sexy) and Shia LaBeouf was surprisingly decent (I think this is the only one of his movies I've seen that I've found to be above mediocre).

Disturbia (2003)

All this film served to do is remind me of why I hate Generations Y & Z so much. The only saving grace is David Morse; he brings more respectibility to this movie than it deserves to have.

Deja Vu (2006)

This movie took time to get going, but it picked up and ended up delivering.

War of the Worlds (2005)

If there's any movie beyond The Adventures of Tintin that can display just how mediocre Speilberg has become as a director, it's this one. How can someone take a great book like War of the Worlds and make it feel so lifeless and dull? How can someone take good actors like Dakota Fanning and Tim Robbins and give them absolutely nothing to work with? The only good scene is the entire film is the one with the peanut butter sandwiches, and that's just sad.

Mystery Men (1999)

I like this movie, though I can see why others wouldn't and why it received so many mixed reviews. I still would have liked to have seen a sequel, though.

Super Mario Bros. (1993)

The only good thing I can say about this movie is that Bob Hoskins could have been a great Mario. Otherwise, it completely sucks; the plot is stupid (the despot of one city on a barren, resourceless parallel Earth really thinks he can conquer the entire world - with all its military powers and the resources at their disposal - with only a handful of stupid lizard men, really?), the acting is bad (Leguizamo is miscast, and Hopper is just painful to behold), and the science worse (if you don't have a basic understanding of how evolution works, then don't write about it).

Unbreakable (2000)

Decent, but not all that engaging; the revelation Samuel L. Jackson's character gives at the end is the only part of the film that really hooked me, I'm sorry to say.

A Beautiful Mind (2001)

I can't believe the screenplay was written by Akiva Goldsman; this film is positively, hauntingly, beautiful and touching. I haven't seen all that many films with Russell Crowe and Jennifer Connelly, yet I still must say there is nothing else they've ever done that comes even come close to touching the heights their performances reached with this film.

I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997)

As far as slashers go, this one was pretty decent. Jennifer Love Hewitt's hair and Anne Heche's body were positively mortifying.

Author
Time

I did another movie commentary with the fine folks that helped me do the Revisited one, this time joined by Mrs. O'Five to talk about "Inception."

http://maxhegel.podbean.com/2013/04/07/inception-commentary/

Unfortunately, I just remembered this morning that it was you guys who convinced me to see it, so I am ashamed for not mentioning it in the commentary.

Just like Revisited, you don't have to be watching the movie to appreciate it, and don't expect too much technical detail from it.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Dark Skies

It suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked.

Negative balls! I wasn't expecting much but damn. stay away.

Author
Time

"Lincoln"

Very well acted and I was engrossed in the performances. Not an epic, but a well crafted film. I'm not sure I would return to it again, but it was worth seeing once.

“First feel fear, then get angry. Then go with your life into the fight.” - Bill Mollison

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I re-watched L.A. Confidential and Chinatown after a while. Really great films. They are one of my favourites, probably just behind OT. I especially love their setting. It is hard to explain really. It is like my (European) perception of an ideal America.

真実

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Joy Ride (2001)

One of the few horror movies of the 21st Century that isn't bad ;-) I only wish Ted Levine had played the actual killer instead of just doing the killer's voice.

The Mummy (1999)

The story and cast are both solid, but the CGI cripples it. Seriously, what is up with all the elongated CG jaws? Does the director have a fetish for dislocated jaws, or is he trying to emulate the Scream films in some way?

Sleeping Bag (1985)

Okay, so this is a music video for the ZZ Top song and not an actual film. It's listed on IMDb, though, so I felt like giving in to some urges. Suffice it to say, there's something about having Heather Langenkamp, Tracey Walter, a monster truck, and a space shuttle launching from within the Great Pyramid all together in one package that I find extremely gratifying.

Nickel Mountain (1984)

A pretty well made and touching film, it still has a rather weak ending. Overall, though, I still liked it, and at least what I expected to happen at the end didn't (that would have killed the entire movie for me).

Psycho IV: The Beginning (1990)

Some nagging little continuity issues with the original film aside, this is a pretty decent prequel to Psycho. Olivia Hussey was convincing as Norman's crazy mother, and Henry Thomas did a great job playing the young Norman Bates. On the downside, this entry in the series is definately the weakest of the four from a visual standpoint.

Author
Time

The Warriors

Believe it or not, I've only seen parts of this up until now. Although I didn't know it, this was the Directors Cut from a few years back, which adds a few really awesome comic book transitions and Sparta references that go a huge way to establishing the tone and that I wish was included in the original. A really fun movie that is the exact sort of comic book fantasy a 13-year-old boy would have of gang life in the late 1970s. I love stuff like this. Some pacing issues near the end, but the editing in this is superb, and it feels like a music video in some places (yet half a decade before MTV) and it has that larger-than-life comic-book style like you found in movies like TMNT: The Movie. Cheesy, not perfect, but pretty well made for what is essentially an exploitation film for early teenagers, despite it's R-rating. Took me a while to realize the guy who does the famous "warriors, come out and play-ay" is also Sully from Commando. It's strange in a way that this has such a huge cult following when there are quite a few films from the 80s that are just as cheesy and fun, but I guess it pre-dates that whole 1980s low-budget fantasy craze by a few years.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

MTV began in 1981. (And music videos existed before it.) The DC isn't exactly beloved by the fanbase either, especially since Walter Hill pulled a Lucas with regards to the 1979 theatrical.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

The Man with the Iron Fists.

Yep. It's as cheesy as it sounds...but it was good fun.

It's pretty violent but the gore isn't constant so it's more shocking when something really over the top happens.

2 Balls - could have been 3 but the music was really distracting.

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

I did another movie commentary with the fine folks that helped me do the Revisited one, this time joined by Mrs. O'Five to talk about "Inception."

http://maxhegel.podbean.com/2013/04/07/inception-commentary/

Unfortunately, I just remembered this morning that it was you guys who convinced me to see it, so I am ashamed for not mentioning it in the commentary.

Just like Revisited, you don't have to be watching the movie to appreciate it, and don't expect too much technical detail from it.

Wayback machine says:

xhonzi:
Let's start a movie discussion podcast!  Gaffer can be the leader, so we'll call it the MacGaffer Group.  It will be Gaffer, xhonzi, 005, and Frink.  I know, the first movie we discuss can be Inception!

005:
Not now and not ever!  I will never see Inception and I will never do a movie discussion Podcast!  I WILL MOST CERTAINLY NEVER DO A MOVIE DISCUSSION PODCAST ABOUT INCEPTION!  MARK MY WORDS, or I OWE YOU A COKE!

I think you owe me a coke.

 

source (http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-MacGaffer-Group/topic/11716/page/1/)

 

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

And secrets.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!