logo Sign In

Last movie seen — Page 175

Author
Time

darth_ender said:

DominicCobb said:

Tobar said:

DominicCobb said:

I decided not to see The Bourne Legacy (even though that was the reason I re-watched the the films) because I didn't want the trilogy to be ruined.

See it, it ruins nothing. I can almost guarantee you'll dig it.

Cool, thanks for the recommendation. Though I'd like to point out that the other reason I didn't see it was I didn't have the time while it was still in theaters. But it'll be at the top of my Netflix queue when it comes out.

I'd hate for you to have to see a 7/10 flick.  Can't blame you for your hesitance ;)

Ha, ha, thanks for your understanding.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

"Kingdom of Heaven" (Director's Cut Blu-Ray)

It was long, but in a good way. Orlando has improved his acting a bit, and he was well directed.

“First feel fear, then get angry. Then go with your life into the fight.” - Bill Mollison

Author
Time

DominicCob, I see you are discovering the art house history of foreign cinema. I went through the same marathon when I was about 17 or 18.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

MY Neighbor Totoro BD.  The morons must have gotten to them as they dvnred the movie which they did not do on Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind.

Too bad morons who like films to look like video have to ruin for those who want their films untouched.

Not degrained too all hell but it is certainly the disney level of so called restoration which Miyazaki said he would avoid on BD.

The movie content has not been changed however and it is a noticeable improvement over the dvd.

They did not include the older english dub however and i hate the disney one.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

zombie84 said:

DominicCob, I see you are discovering the art house history of foreign cinema. I went through the same marathon when I was about 17 or 18.

Yep, I'm 17. These aren't the first I've seen but now I'm really getting into them. There's a lot of good stuff out there. Until now it's mostly been some Kurosawa and Fellini amongst a few others. But I still got a lot more and I'm pretty excited about it.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I see last movie is dredd 3D action movie. Mostly i watched action movies and i like it. I watched this movie at Mymoviescenters

Author
Time

Night of the Living Dead (1968)

Thanks to my dumbass father, I missed the first five or ten minutes of the film, and then, throughout the rest of the film, I had to listen to my sister ask her usual dumbass questions (You want to know what's happening, then WATCH, you ignorant bitch!) and make her usual dumbass comments (No, it would NOT be better in colour, and BTW, who CARES if Johnny looks like a goddamn nerd?!) Suffice to say, I had a hard time enjoying it. I've seen the movie before, though, and enjoyed it a lot more then, so perhaps under better circumstances I'd have given it a better rating.

6/10

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Watching films with family is not recommended. =P Actually, I've been having problems trying to watch things with people in general lately. I've been trying to watch all of the Resident Evil films before checking out the latest (why? I really don't know. =P) but for two weeks now the person I was supposed to watch them with has been an excuse generator. So....

Resident Evil (2002)

^ What a weird trailer. Anyway, it wasn't bad. I haven't played any of the games so I can't say how faithful it is. But it was definitely one of the best video game inspired films I've seen. Not to say it's great or anything but it does what it set out to accomplish. A competent popcorn flick.

Resident Evil: Apocalypse (2004)

Man, these trailers are something else. The movie's not bad but they really turned up the cheese factor in this one. I can see that's going to be a trend. Who knows what shenanigans they get up to in Retribution.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Tobar said:


Watching films with family is not recommended. =P


I usually don't if I can help it. Unfortunately, in this case, I couldn't. As there are only two TVs in the house which receive satellite service, I would've had to choose between the living room or my mother's room, and since she just got out of the hospital after having surgery, I wasn't going to disturb her, so I had to go with the former.

---

The Lottery (1969)

This short film is faithful to Shirley Jackson's short story, but faithfulness doesn't keep it from being mediocre; the cinematography has no flare, and the actors weren't very good - the guy who played Old Man Warner being the worst offender.

5/10

Author
Time

Saw Independence Day for the first time in years the other day.  I'd forgotten how weak the effects and designs were.  And it once again struck home how we Americans value arrogance in our heroes and non-self-conscious big mouthed black men.  With Will Smith we get both!  This is not intended as racism, but rather a commentary on how we perpetuate ignorant differences between the races.  Imagine if Tom Cruise in Top Gun acted like Smith did here.  It would not be funny--it'd be obnoxious and he'd be looked at as an idiot.  But we can all laugh at the extremely outspoken black man because, well, he's black...and black people are always funny.  Essentially, I'm actually calling the repeated portrayals of black people like that as racist.

Watched the end of Timeline last night (I'd seen it before, but it's been a while and the wife had already watched most of it), based on the Michael Crichton novel.  I've never read the book, but what I have read from Crichton is pretty good, and this movie, while interesting conceptually, is just full of dumb cliches and lame characters.  I think of all the weirdness I saw, the part that makes me laugh the most is when the French and English simultaneously launch fiery arrows at each other during a nighttime battle.  Okay, right?  Then the English quickly launch another volley of "night arrows" (also known as "arrows").  Yes, these night arrows are not lit on fire!  They then strike the French who are preparing their next volley of fiery arrows and can't see the night arrows until they are hit without their shields defending themselves.  All the while, the snooty, arrogant bad guy watches with a big smirk on his face.  The nerve of that guy!  How dare he be so amoral as to launch night arrows in a war!?  Doesn't he know you're supposed to give your enemy every possible advantage?  But he smiles like a jerk because he's soooooo evil and values his apparent tactical brilliance over a fair fight.  Just.  So.  Lame.

Author
Time

Dr. No (1962) 8/10 - I watched this, of course, on October 5th, its 50th Anniversary. A very interesting film. As I'm sure many know, it's a different type of Bond movie. The Bondian elements are few and far between, and what's left feels unlike anything that came after. In fact, watching it again, it feels almost like a detective film. A really weird detective film. And I don't say weird as in comparison to the other 007 films. I mean it's very uneven tonally. Other qualms include the fact that Honey Rider shows up in the third act and does literally nothing, and a less than stellar editing of the music (great theme, but it's played at weird times for little purpose). Anyway, the film is great fun and really cool, when all is said and done. And it's also intriguing to watch and think what its legacy would be like if Bond never returned.

From Russia With Love (1963) 10/10 - My favorite Bond film for as long as I've seen a Bond film (this was my first - when I was, I think, 7). And, seriously, there's just so much to love here, including what I think is easily the greatest henchman of any Bond film - Robert Shaw as Grant. I think it's most certainly the best espionage film of all time, and the only Bond movie that is truly a spy movie. The plot is deliciously intricate, and SPECTRE is in top form here. All their scenes are absolute classics. Additionally you have some of the best sequences in any Bond film (the suspenseful and clever cold open, the fight aboard the Orient, the helicopter attack, and the brilliantly small yet enormously thrilling final showdown with Klebb, and of course all the other ones - I could list them but I feel I've said enough on that matter). And, of course, with any good Bond film, you get classic scenes with M, Moneypenny, and Q, who gives to Bond what is probably the most realistic gadget in the entire series - and also the most interesting. And you get one of the best and most beautiful Bond girls, Tatiana, and one of the most enjoyable Bond allies, Kareem Bay. And let us not forget Connery, who honestly gives his greatest Bond performance ever here. Okay, I think I've said enough. You get the idea. I freaking love this movie.

Author
Time

Have had a Connery James Bond marathon for the past couple of weeks. I'm not going to rate these, because I feel they need no rating.

Dr. No - James has the charm, but he also has that darkness to him in this movie. He has some cold blooded moments in this. Love the cinematography and overall style of this film.

From Russia With Love - This film had one of the most interesting villains played by the always fantastic Robert Shaw. I really love the atmosphere, and the overall look of it.

Goldfinger -Count me in on the long list of people who think this is the best Bond. Everything from the soundtrack, to the car, to the bond girls, to the villain. Auric Goldfinger was such a great villian, shame he didn't pop up more. Blofeld was cool, but I think we got enough appearances of him. 

Thunderball - If this movie didn't look so good, I wouldn't like it as much. Yes, it has more over the top moments, and brassier instrumentals, but it drags at times. It's saved by excellent cinematography and Connery's charm.

You Only Live Twice - Back to the good old formula, finally get to see Blofeld. The only thing that I can say negatively about it, is the little moment were they made bond look like "a japanese man". That was pretty bad. The soundtrack was just as good as it's predecessors.

Diamonds Are Forever - Don't care what anybody says, I love it. Sure, it's completely cut out the seriousness for camp. I really think it makes a funny bond. Of course, I am the type that likes elementary level humor, so I can't really be a good judge.

 

 

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas

<span> </span>

Author
Time

Never Say Never Again (1983)

It was great seeing Connery back in the role again. I quite enjoyed this movie. Plenty of good action and a great villain. It had its quirks but it was fun overall.

Looper (2012)

Loved it. Fantastic world, great pace, fun concept. JGL looked a little weird but he did a good job of aping some of Willis' mannerisms. Great film.

Pinocchio (1940)

I believe this was my first Disney film. As such, it's also one of my favorites. Hadn't seen it in years, wonderful.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time


Looper (2012)

Loved it. Fantastic world, great pace, fun concept. JGL looked a little weird but he did a good job of aping some of Willis' mannerisms. Great film.


..and Willis' nose

 

Author
Time

A View to a Kill (1985)

Man, what the heck was with that Beach Boys interlude during the opening chase? Terrible. A lot of the action at the beginning of the film is very over the top and cartoonish. Christopher Walken was fun but Grace Jones just creeps me out. A shame Moore went out this way.

The Living Daylights (1987)

Dalton is a kind of nonentity in this one with no real personality to speak of. Hopefully he grows. Overall the film was decent.

Fantasia (1940)

Now I have a much greater appreciation for A Corny Concerto. =P Beautifully animated to be sure.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Ouch. To me Dalton gave the strongest performance since Moore's first outings, if not Lazenby. Each time I go back to his two, I find all kinds of new material he covered, things he brought to the role but always especially that sheer conviction.

Licence to Kill

This one just gets better with age. Sure there were heavy budget cuts, the production was forced to work in Mexico, Dick Maibaum was forced out by the Guild strike, but the necessary elements do come together to make this far more than a British Lethal Weapon/Die Hard clone. Glen's direction is very tightly wound, the cinematography is expansive enough for a Bond adventure without losing the grittier feel of the story, Davi makes a wonderful smouldering villain though I still feel Sanchez is underutilized, Pam is the feistiest Bond girl since...well since Tracy actually, Q gets a role that isn't his standard exasperated toymaker, the increasingly politicized SIS and the rather foppish M get a great axe, and top marks for the filming of one of Fleming's best ever scenes-Bond's cold blooded murder of the man responsible for maiming Leiter. Dalton is again magnificent and completely in his element.

The largest issue here is the under-baked script which was only compounded by the budget cuts. This also leads to my other main criticism: that some of the sets and locations are not only uninspired but rather fake looking. Lupe Lamora  is a character that receives far too much screen time and is so underwritten that she quickly becomes an annoyance. The bar scene is far too comedic, and after all these years I still cannot believe they used the stuffed swordfish gag. The score although reminiscent of other 80's action films does have it moments.

A dark film, one that takes massive risks despite a compromised production, and one that only earns my respect for that. Some of the stuntwork is absolutely exceptional.

3.5 balls out of 4, and the last time Bond was truly a mortal man of flesh and blood.

Interestingly, there is a shot in the climax that is the purest example we will ever see of Fleming on-screen. After all is said and done, Bond is barely alive and nearly a bloody pulp. He collapses on a rock and observes his handiwork, then letting the feeling of death wash over him with a sharp intake of breath, and almost inwardly sighs.

 

Goldeneye

Style. It's all about style. This is really the only thing that's left in a film that quickly goes on autopilot. It is also self-aware, and despite my great love for all the pointed dialogue like "It's what keeps me alive" this isn't how Bond works in either book or film. There is enormous potential and an actor who wants to do justice to the role, but in the end Brosnan gives his best "misogynist dinosaur Cold War relic" performance and that's about it. The film goes overboard in trying to setup Bond in a post-Cold War world and then it simply stops. GE only has these two elements fully intact and then absolutely wastes the supreme battle of Bond versus friend.

Case in point: after the train scene, the film is effectively over. Bond goes and gets the baddie. I find myself lamenting the loss of Mishkin and/or even Orumov because after the plot is revealed, they could actually provide some greater plot interest with Bond against Trevalyan. I could always picture Bond working against type with the Russian Defense Minister against the wishes of SIS, or better yet in a Fleming style with the drunken betrayed partner of his enemy. What is missing in the film is human vitality.

This is why we all like the one liners scattered through GE, the Brosnan smirks, the knowing sense of Bond's experience and scenes like meeting with Zukovsky. They should have worked harder on fine tuning the script for the first Bond in 6 years. The cinematography is great, sound design sublime, and the feel of a Bond submerged in the 90's Eurothriller is intoxicating. And in---you know what screw it. I love the score. They shouldn't have tried to hide what Serra composed as it only hurts the film. A traditional 007 score wouldn't have worked with such a cold stylized film. Only John Barry could have pulled what was necessary otherwise.

3 balls out of 4. And I like Natalya far better nowadays as she doesn't seem so helpless. This may have been from playing the N64 game too many times and always being tempted to leave her/shoot her/throw remote mines at her/plant mines all around her and then force her to walk with you etc.

Of course the teaser trailer gets a perfect 4 ball score. Despite the "MTV" style cutting that thing bowled audiences over in 1994/1995. Still the best trailer I've ever seen, giving audiences both old and new exactly all the right elements that entice the world back to 007. And that Parodi/Fair music was so good they've used it in every ad since. The trailer is better than the film itself.


Tomorrow Never Dies

If I said GE was on autopilot, meet TND. This is the producer's attempt to make a TSWLM-style crowd pleaser for a 90's audience. The script was not finished before shooting commenced, the story had been through numerous writers and drafts, people came and left (including Anthony Hopkins as the villain!!!) and IT SHOWS. Like GE a major strength is the produciton values, but here it IS the main strength. Roger Spottiswoode does a fabulous job holding the reins, and the film is so tightly edited that it could be used to teach students proper editing technique in addition as to hide plot weakness (which it does 100%). The sound design is some of the best ever done IMO. Just nonstop, balls to the wall.

Brosnan is a bit swept up in all this, and this time Bond is a bit of a non-entity. Carver makes for a great villain, is well played by Pryce, but is just too ineffectively written to seem like much of a threat which is lamentable. Stamper is also an underwritten non-entity. Ooh a big bad blond German...who takes a knife exactly like Red Grant hmm...Wai Lin is also written badly as a complete cliche and yet another non-entity. I've never understood why Bond insists they will "finish this together." Idiot. Of course none of this compares with the ultimate non-entity of Paris, who is supposed to provide some kind of motivation for 007 and does little more than induce cringes, provide a useless reference to Dr. No, tell Bond where to go and move the plot, induce more cringes, give Bond a more risque sex scene than usual and she actually slaps 007 in public. INSTANT DEATH WARRANT! Okay, she does lead us to the wonderful breath of fresh air that is the Bond-Dr. Kauffman scene which is not only the best in the entire film but the only one that has any true imagination or for me impact.

TND is all action, and old school styled action at that that we aren't likely to see again. It tries to move along over it's bumpy plot and when viewed on a big screen it is possible to switch the brain off. Hats of the the production team for this.

It isn't bad just not at all memorable, never reaching anything near it's potential. Autopilot 007. 3 balls out of 4.

And I like parts of the score but overall feel Arnold just can't cut it with 007. It is too overdone, too throwback, too upfront in places and too multifaceted. The title song has a great instrumental, decent lyrics but a horrid vocal.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time

captainsolo said:

 

Licence to Kill

... the last time Bond was truly a mortal man of flesh and blood.

I'm assuming you're leaving out Casino Royale when you make that statement.

Author
Time

LOOPER!

Saw it last night with two buddies and we all freakin loved it.  Finally an original movie for a change.  Go see it!

“In the future it will become even easier for old negatives to become lost and be “replaced” by new altered negatives. This would be a great loss to our society. Our cultural history must not be allowed to be rewritten.” - George Lucas

Author
Time

Finally watched the Living Daylights. I got the single Blu-Ray from Target. My respect for Timothy Dalton continues to grow. He's definitely the most different Bond. Connery may be the most satisfying Bond for the cinema, but Dalton really is noteworthy, in the fact that he takes the role in a completely different direction to previous and succeeding portrayals. This is probably for the fact that he is the most accurate Bond to the novel: thoughtful, subtle, troubled, witty (TO AN EXTENT), and deadly. Living Daylights had a decent supporting cast: I liked the cello girl and definitely Necros, the most menacing Red Grant knock-off, IMO. To me, The Living Daylights simply is superb and the closest we'll see to a non Fleming, Fleming-esque movie.

I felt this one was superior to Licence to Kill, which suffered from lack of exotic locations and some other flaws, including Q's oddly large role... Licence to Kill does have some brilliant moments though...

FWIW: my top 10 Bond list in belated reaction to the 50th anniversary:

1) From Russia with Love

2) On Her Majesty's Secret Service

3) Casino Royale

4) The Living Daylights

5) Goldeneye

6) Goldfinger

7) Thunderball

8) Live and Let Die

9) Dr. No

10) Moonraker

Author
Time

E.T.

 

First time I've seen the theatrical cut in over a decade, so it felt like I was watching it for the first time again.

Author
Time

My fascination with Pripyat compelled me to watch Chernobyl Diaries despite knowing it wasn't filmed there. Pretty meh, but watchable. 6/10