logo Sign In

Jabba the Hutt

Author
Time

I was thinking about the Jabba scene in HOPE, and complaints about the lousy CGI, repeated exposition from the Greedo scene, and the early intro to the Falcon.

My idea was that the scene COULD potentially be reworked - it'd involve drastic editing and effects, but it could solve some of those problems problems.

Pretty much the only original footage used in the scene would be that of Han and Chewie. It's not in the hangar anymore, it's just the backroom someplace Jabba uses as a front. Jabba's mostly stationary in a dark room like in JEDI - the original stand-in is can be replaced by a pig guard or some other goon he keeps around. It's cut so that it's like Han is talking to him across the room while walking up to him. The subtitles can be edited however to make the scene work.

Think it'd work? I know the logistics are a pain in the ass, but it's a start.

Author
Time

I think the scene makes no sense when inserted into the film. Han is trying to escape Tatooine in a hurry due to the bounty hunters that are pursuing him; yet in the middle there's this scene where he manages to buy some time with a 15% extra. I feel it makes the price on his head much less dramatic.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

The scene was a fun extra treat for the '77 rerelease, but it was not necessary for the story, and it does not make sense when taken in context of the larger story. As PCITSCH said, it doesn't make sense for Han to be talking with Jabba if he's trying to get out in a hurry. He says to Luke and Obi Wan, "We're a little rushed, so if you'll just strap yourselves in we'll get out of here." Why would Han say this if he just finished buying himself time with Jabba. Also, if Jabba is the most wealthy and powerful person on all of Tattoine, why is he hiking all the way out to Mos Eisley to shake down one of his former employees for money? Doesn't he have better things to do, like feeding Twi'lek strippers to his rancor while getting baked on spice? I thought that he had bounty hunters to take care of debt collection?

The scene is totally useless and should not be integrated into the actual film. Not on a permanent basis, at least. Like I said, it was fun to see it in theaters, but long-term it should stay as an extra on the side.

Author
Time

The main problem is not that the scene is unecessary... it's that it is WEAK. Jabba's dialogue is inconsistent, the acting is poor, and it sticks out like a sore thumb.  It was wisely cut in the original editing.

"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I always thought they should replace that bad Jabba with a hologram of Jabba being projected by an R2 unit. We've seen other characters have a walk-and-talk with various sized holograms before and they can paint out the original actor without needing something big enough to just cover over him. The scene is still lame though. Han would never be standing that close to Jabba's mouth for one thing.

Author
Time

The hologram from a droid is actually a great idea, but even with the technical issues solved the scene still has no place in the movie.

Author
Time

My issue with the scene is that Jabba seems entirely inconsistent with the ruthless, merciless gangster we see in Return Of The Jedi.  This scene makes Jabba seem like a bit of a pushover, and not someone to really be afraid of.  Also, has anyone else notice the OBVIOUS editing continuity error here?  The cutaway to Chewie walking away from the entrance to the hangar when he was already walking behind Han & Jabba in the previous and following shots?

-NJM

Author
Time

Continuity errors abound in Star Wars.  Like bad dialogue, we shouldn't be selective when we pick them out for scrutiny and criticism.

 

The scene itself is fine in my opinion.  Jabba has a townhouse in Mos Eisley, so it's not as though he's trekked all the way from his palace (admittedly, this is an EU factoid and not clear from the film).  As for Han being in a rush, yes he is, but when he enters the hangar and sees Jabba and his men there, what's he supposed to do? 

 

Although the scene goes over the same ground, plotwise, it just reinforces the severity of Han's faux pas in dumping the shipment, and how urgently Jabba needs paying off.

 

Still, there was always something about not seeing Jabba until Return Of The Jedi.  Having him just being referred to by name in both of the films gave him a build-up which he didn't fail to live up to in that glorious rescue-of-Han sequence.

That's some bad hat, Harry
Author
Time

I think the scene should be left out because of the crapitude of staging a scene around a CG Jabba. For whatever reason, Lucas can't simply cut away to something, he has to make Han step on Jabba's tail.

Basically, Han is at Jabba's mercy. Jabba has a crew of bounty hunters with him, any of whom, I'd imagine, would be perfectly willing to blow Han away if Jabba gives the order. Stepping on Jabba's tail isn't what any thinking person would do in such a situation.

But there's also the CG itself to think about. It played in TPM because Jabba was only in, what, two or three shots? Plus, he needed to move around a little bit. No big deal. But he's the focal point of the hangar scene and the aesthetic differences between even the 2004 CG Jabba vs. the 1983 puppet are too vast to really believe in.

ANH was fine the way it was, it doesn't need a bunch of CGI and crap like that. The Jabba scene should be cut back out.

All I really want is each film as it was originally seen and heard in theaters; no fixes, corrections, "improvements" or modifications necessary.

Author
Time

I much prefer the 97 Jabba over the TPM one. If the first CGI one didn't fit the 77 footage-that one sure as hell didn't.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time

Do you perhaps mean the 2004 CG Jabba? Because I honestly wouldn't be able to understand someone preferring the 1997 CG Jabba.

If you are talking about the 2004 Jabba, well, that would make sense because it was five years newer and more high tech than the Ep 1 Jabba.

Incidentally, the fact that we're talking about all of these variations and versions and years is another reason why the original trilogy should never have been tampered with in the first place.

All I really want is each film as it was originally seen and heard in theaters; no fixes, corrections, "improvements" or modifications necessary.

Author
Time

When I first saw a screenshot of the '97 Jabba I thought "Bless, some little kid has made a Jabba The Hutt out of plasticine and sent in a photo".  Honestly, I did not expect to see something so awful with ILM's name on it.  Simply atrocious and embarrassing.

 

They redid it for the DVD.  It looks better.  But the blocking is still painful to watch, with Han's arm occupying the same space as Jabba in certain frames.  And I agree: Han stepping on Jabba's tail.  No, no and, er, no.

 

I am not anti-CGI by any means.  But what does it say when the rubber puppet in ROTJ still looks more convincing than the CGI versions in ANH and TPM?

That's some bad hat, Harry
Author
Time

I always thought the TPM Jabba looked great. Why couldn't they have used that one in the 2004 edition? It looks like him, whereas the 2004 Jabba looks less like Jabba than the 1997 one. His animation is better though, because when Han steps on his tail you can see him get ticked off and he makes a fist, whereas the 1997 Jabba just stood there and took it. But the scene has so many problems, technical and storywise, plus editorially, the whole thing just so clearly doesn't belong in the film. It was fun in 1997 to see because the 1997 release was just sort of a fun bonus in a way, "hey, here's what Star Wars looks like with enhanced effects and new material, cool", but as a permanent part of the film it has no real place. But I guess if you consider the SE as a permanent part of the film the Jabba scene is just the tip of the iceberg so it seems kind of pointless to complain.

Author
Time

I think if the 1997/2004 Jabba were replaced with the TPM Jabba, and the "stepping on the tail" thing could be somehow removed, I wouldn't mind the scene ... with one caveat.

The Greedo scene should also be reworked to more closely follow the shooting script.  This honestly wouldn't be that hard.

Dialogue as is now:

Greedo: Going somewhere, Solo?
Han: Yes, Greedo, as a matter of fact, I was just going to see your boss.  Tell Jabba that I've got his money.
Greedo: It's too late.  You should have paid him when you had the chance.  Jabba's put a price on your head so large, every bounty hunter in the galaxy will be looking for you.  I'm lucky I found you first.
Han: Yeah, but this time, I've got the money.
Greedo: If you give it to me, I might forget I found you.
Han: I don't have it with me.  Tell Jabba--
Greedo: Jabba's through with you.  He has no time for smugglers who drop their shipments at the first sign of an Imperial cruiser.
Han: Even I get boarded sometimes.  You think I had a choice?
Greedo: You can tell that to Jabba.  He may only take your ship.
Han: Over my dead body.
Greedo: That's the idea.  I've been looking forward to this for a long time ...
Han: Yes, I'll bet you have.
[BLAM!]

Now, my proposal for the revised dialogue (this only requires removing some of Han's dialogue and changing Greedo's subtitles), mostly taken from the revised fourth draft of the script:

Greedo: Going somewhere, Solo?
Han: Yes, Greedo, as a matter of fact, I was just going to see your boss.  Tell Jabba that I've got his money.
Greedo: That's what you said yesterday.  I'm not going back to Jabba with another one of your stories.
Han: Yeah, but this time, I've got the money.
Greedo: Then I'll take it now.
Han: I don't have it with me.  Tell Jabba--
Greedo: It's too late for that.  Jabba would rather have your ship.
Han: Over my dead body.
Greedo: That's the idea.  I've been looking forward to this for a long time ...
Han: Yes, I'll bet you have.
[BLAM!]

That mostly solves the redundancy issue between the Greedo scene and the Jabba scene.

Author
Time

ChainsawAsh said:

I think if the 1997/2004 Jabba were replaced with the TPM Jabba, and the "stepping on the tail" thing could be somehow removed, I wouldn't mind the scene ... with one caveat.

<etc>

It still is considerably worse with the Jabba scene in it.  For one thing, the Greedo scene is much more in character with Han when you realize that he had no intention of seeing Jabba... he was just saying that to Greedo.  Like, "oh yeah, I was just going to go see him" yeah, right.  Having them then really meet with Han calling the shots just destroys the whole thing. And then with bad acting and CGI on top of it... yuck!

"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars

Author
Time

Easterhay said:

I am not anti-CGI by any means.  But what does it say when the rubber puppet in ROTJ still looks more convincing than the CGI versions in ANH and TPM?

Yes. And even if ILM was somehow one day be able to get the CG to look exactly like the great ROTJ puppet, the scene still wouldn't belong in the movie no matter how much it's changed or tinkered with.

Author
Time

I believe the 2004 DVD Jabba was the model from TPM, but the coloring was off. It was shaped more like the ROTJ Jabba than the First SE one. What could have been done if a long shot with a stand in having Han walking in the other direction which would eliminate him having to step on Jabba's tail.

Author
Time

You know what else would have eliminated him having to stop on Jabba's tail?  NOT HAVING THE SCENE IN THE MOVIE.

:p

Author
Time

I knew that, but it was nice to have a bonus. I don't hate the scene.

Author
Time

Like with changing the Greedo scene, it cheapens the villains and mades them feel less threatening. This reduces dramatic tension and makes us worry less about whether our heroes will make it out alright. If a hired bounty hunter misses from 5 feet away, why should we worry about government soldiers hitting anybody from a further distance?

If Han can just brazenly talk back to his gang leader like that, why should we be worried about when they all get captured in Jabba's Palace in Return of the Jedi? Surely if Jabba is okay with letting Han off with a warning this time because he's been promised the money in advance, then there's no reason to believe Jabba won't gladly accept the payment in Jedi since Han can more than afford it on the spot.

What's that, Jabba doesn't care and would rather have Han killed and forgo an amount of money greater than what was owed him? But then why was he cool with it in A New Hope?

I mean imagine if a gang leader was like:

Gang Leader "Yo, I want your 2,000 you owe me."

Gang Member "fine just give me more time and I'll pay you a little extra"

Leader "alright since I'm a nice guy, I'll let you go with that. Just pay me 2,500 next month"

6 months to a year later

Leader "that's it, you didn't pay me on time, time to die"

Member "But I have the money with me. Just uncuff me and I'll get it out of my briefcase for you. Here, since I took much longer than promised, I'll just let you have 5,000."

Leader "Who do you take me for, a pansy forgiving doormat? I have plenty of money already and I don't care how much you can pay me now. I'm going to execute you anyways just to set an example for everyone else to see, that there will be unforgivable consequences for failing me."

 

Does that sound like the gang leader has the same character and personality? Does he/she behave the same way in one instance as another? This is contradictory behavior without any explanation as to why

Incidentally, if you watch all three back to back to back (like I did this May 25th), you might notice something similar with Darth Vader. He's just one of what is presumed to be many fear imposing people working for the Empire. Then he's an unforgiving badass in ESB. Then right at the beginning of Jedi, he's like "the Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" and kind of is a weak character who feels trapped in the situation, rather than someone who gets off on being a BAMF.

There's nothing wrong with a character having an arc but even in the original versions of the films, Vader's transformation feels rushed, abrupt and yes even forced. (get it?) 

Take back the trilogy. Execute Order '77

http://www.youtube.com/user/Knightmessenger

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Knightmessenger said:


Then right at the beginning of Jedi, he's like "the Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" and kind of is a weak character who feels trapped in the situation, rather than someone who gets off on being a BAMF.


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/luisk/bamf.jpg

Author
Time

The only possible decent use for that scene is to roto Boba fett into another part of mos eisley so he could have a very minor character appearance skulking around mos eisley... Probably when Luke and Ben are on there way to the falcon.