hmmm...would have to dig for links;P
- one was i think a chat transcript that the author had with readers of the washington post around the eve of episode III's premiere.
- another was some 'interview' lucas had and the reporter asked him about something referenced in Skywalking and Lucas said the book had as much truth as the national enquirer. I think he said that Pollock wasnt there and his info was hearsay and then offered the so-called truth of what happened. Whatever the topic was, it actually wasnt about bad directing or writing. the reporter then asked about something else and lucas said "yeah, again - they got that info from Skywalking..." and i think this was a year before TPM...i think. and it was a print 'interview', not video or online.
I havent seen/read an 'interview' firsthand since 2006, so maybe he doesnt talk about it anymore unless someone brings it up. So I may re-edit and say "he insisted at the time". Maybe its no longer necessary to bring it up - you dont need Skywalking anymore to realize what lucas is ;P
I myself read the book in 1995 and laughed at the thought of how horrified everyone was at lucas' lack of direction and incompetant screenwriting thinking to myself "man, he must have really been bad - how did AG and the OT turn out good?".
It should have been a harbinger of things to come but I shrugged it off- after all, in the 'interviews' Lucas said all the right things. No, the only thing that caught my eye was around the time of the SE and Cinescape (I think) did an interview with Gary Kurtz and Kurtz said something like "I dont know....Lucas just doesnt want to push himself". That raised an eyebrow. I mean, to accuse an artist (if you even want to call lucas that) of not putting a 100% is fighting words. but its true.