
- Time
- Post link
haljordan28 said:
the overuse of CGI to me was very simple to understand. This all boils down to greed on lucas behalf. All about profit. Lucas owns all of the new state of the art cgi technology. He used the three PT films to showcase what his company was capable of doing. No telling how much he has made just on other companies wanting to use his tech. Not to mention it saves money not needing props and certain locations. Why fly personal and equipment around the world at a heavy cost when you can use CGI to create a background or location for nearly a fraction of the cost.
I would just like to say to Lucas that you can't take money with you when you die. The only true thing you can take with you is that which you leave behind. A legacy, a body of work and he went from being hailed as a genius and master film maker to being ridiculed and laughed at it. He ruined his legacy and his reputation all for what? A few extra bucks.
Given that Lucas has been overwhelmingly a director interested in visuals and technical processes I think it's baseless, bordering on silly, to say that the use of CGI is motivated by greed.
While it indeed might be cheaper to use CGI backgrounds rather than location shooting or extremely extensive sets (since most of the PT locations could not actually be found on Earth), I fail to see why Lucas is
- obligated to go a more expensive route on his self-funded picture lest he be called 'greedy.'
- forbidden from using the technology he developed for this very purpose.
Also, using the PT to "showcase" his technology kind of ignore the facts that
- ILM had been a gold standard of SFX for decades, hiring out to do all sorts of films.
- There's nothing that revolutionary in the PT that the industry wasn't already gearing up for and didn't know ILM (and other FX houses) was already capable of.
As for your moralizing at the end there, George Lucas made some of the greatest films of all time, including four films already in the Library of Congress and on the AFI Top 100. Nothing can take that away from him. And as for his few extra bucks, the PT made almost 3 billion dollars in box office alone.
So let me honestly ask... if Geonosis had been shot on location somewhere, would the AOTC plots somehow not have sucked? If the Gungan City had been an actual set would Jar-Jar have not been annoying? If Mustafar had been real, would the Anakin/Padme romance have worked dramatically? I think what you're complaining about it meaningless when compared to why the movies were actually not good.