
- Time
- Post link
It's not that, I was just confused with the way you were using it. If I'm confused, then this is gonna get confusing for others pretty quick! The term "non-LID" doesn't work for me. Use normal words.
Anyway.
>>So is this "Laserdisc is dead" is like "Rock'nRoll is dead" or "Elvis is dead" or "James Brown is Dead" or "George Lucas's creativity (which raped my childhood) is dead as a doorknob"... etc.
No, those are depressing concepts. =D The Star Wars laserdisc being "dead" makes us all happy .... that we'll have it in better quality.
>> Now will a 1080 (i or p) version of the OT make the DVD dead too?
=D If it's a good one and not just upsampled. But let's not get ahead of ourselves.
It's a brave new world, folks. The O-OT in pristine quality, to be had by anyone.
The question posed by this thread is: What can we do with it? What do we do with Star Wars now?
Mike Verta had the right idea. The 2004 DVD, despite its quality, wasn't cutting it for him because of the color correction. So he fixed that. The 2006 DVDs might not cut it for some of us either - we want even clearer quality, which might require going back to the 2004 DVD and correcting that for much of the film. We want mono mix. We want 70mm/SE mix on Empire ... we want this trilogy tricked out like a gangsta yo.
Or maybe we just want to get on with our lives and enjoy our 2006 DVDs in peace.
Either way works for me.