Pretty sure the revised BD is the old SE master or utilizes a higher generation version of what made the SE.
Recalibrated my CRT with Video Essentials..so of course that means...more 007 transfers obviously!!
ruminations:
1. The Criterion Dr. No is quite similar to the MGM Connery version. Color is rather close with some fluctuation and a general darker feeling found in the print sourced Criterion. Their cropping is a bit tighter, but not always. It is rather a close call, with the MGM being the more technically robust and sharper of the two.
2. The Goldfinger CAV MGM boxset is exactly the same as the Connery CLV version, just in full CAV and perhaps a tiny bit cleaner. The audio is a bit less hissy overall and the titles are still in stereo.
3. Is it just me or does the color on the CAV Thunderball appear a bit muted against the previous copies? I just can't get away from that deep saturation on the 1989 disc.
4. Saturation seems perfect on YOLT, and with a bit of contrast reduction I think it would match a print.
5. What in the hell caused OHMSS to lose scenes on the SE DVD?
6. SE and BD. They bleached the life out of DAF. Twice. Damn mad professor in a minibus.
7. LALD looks great on the 1991 disc. But that had dropouts and mistakenly placed the mono isolated score on the right digital track. So they made a 1993 corrected copy...and it's a winner. A bit better than the '91 disc with brilliant color and detail that places it at arguably the peak of the transfers for reproduction of the 70's stock.
The 5.1 remix track is just plain AWFUL.
8. TMWTGG appears to have been shot to where everything has a sort of golden cast...intentional or is this my critic side getting to artistic with the best gem of 1974?
9. They did too much noise reduction on Spy. The trailer has more facial detail than the transfer.