Monroville:
Darth, you're really being a dick about this. The "instantaneous" I refer to is how "instantaneous" an explosion is to mere humans such as ourselves. When something is moving at 20,000 miles per second, it may as well be "instantaneous" to us, or a spaceship like the Falcon which has to fly much slower than 20,000 miles per second flying through DS2 construction.
Your logic is trying to say a really fast hot-rodded car can outrun a nuclear blast AT THE SOURCE. Yes, nothing is instant - everything takes a few milliseconds at least for a reaction. But to HUMANS it may as well be, and the DS2 is not powered by hamsters on a treadmill.
Besides, this is a WISHLIST!!!!!!! As in, a suggestion for others to read, scratch their chin (or other hairy body parts) and think: "hmm, that could be a good idea!" or "hmm, that's just plain silly!"
You want to make an argument about logic? The whole point of the MYTHBUSTERS example is to show real explosions. Yes, they are ignited, much like how the Falcon ignited the reactor - it just didn't blow up on its own. Yes, explosions are not "instantaneous", but something happening within milliseconds is a hell of lot different than taking a leisurely walk through the woods. Shit man, ever hear of SUPERNOVAS?
You know, I'm tired of this. Or as Tyler Durdan would say: "This conversation is OVER"
First of all, when was the last time you saw an explosion move at 20,000 miles per second? Second, the Death Star explosion doesn't move anywhere near that fast, and there's absolutely nothing to suggest it does. So your entire point is rather moot. And you say instantaneous to things as small as humans. Yes, but we're talking about a spaceship with the ability to move away from an explosion at great speed. If you're going to use an analogy, try to at least make it relevant.
And now you're throwing supernovae into the mix? Between Mythbusters and supernovae you've come up with some absurd connection that you think dismisses my argument. What do those two things have to do with the Death Star exploding? The demonstrations on Mythbusters have absolutely no bearing on this discussion, and supernovae are immensely more powerful events than the Death Star exploding. A supernova occurs in stars with about nine times the mass of our Sun, the Death Star II is a mostly-hollow machine 900km across. Where's the relevance?
Sorry, but if someone countering your point because they think you're wrong is being a dick, then so be it, I'm a dick.