DrCrowTStarwars said:
Stupid slutty plants having sex all over all of us.
I think I should create a "Phrases You Never Thought You'd Hear/Read but are Glad You Did" thread and make this my first submission into it.
DO IT
I thought you had to get permission in the New Thread Thread Thread
K. Let’s have this ride.
Eh, close enough.
As I've been organizing my overly large collection of Star Wars pictures, and removing duplicates, I can't help but feel more than a little annoyed at the selfishness of Darth Neo and watermarking every picture he's ever scanned, as if he somehow held legal right to these pictures.
darth_ender said:
As I've been organizing my overly large collection of Star Wars pictures, and removing duplicates, I can't help but feel more than a little annoyed at the selfishness of Darth Neo and watermarking every picture he's ever scanned, as if he somehow held legal right to these pictures.
It makes you wonder if the following is his sockpuppet account. http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/user-profile.cfm/Darth-Asshole/user/2039/
A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.
I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!
—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3
^I don't know what's most peculiar about that guy -- his name or the fact that he only made four posts from 2005 to 2012.
I've read that Carrie Fisher was considered for the role of Lois Lane in the '78 Superman film. I wish she had gotten the part; I can't stand Margot Kidder or her homely Keith Richards face.
DuracellEnergizer said:
I've read that Carrie Fisher was considered for the role of Lois Lane in the '78 Superman film. I wish she had gotten the part;
I can't stand Margot Kidder or her homely Keith Richards face.
I hate wisdom teeth. One has been giving me all kinds of issues, and has become infected. I have no dental coverage, so I'm gonna have to figure something out, because the tooth and possibly more needs to come out.
"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas
<span> </span>
If it makes you feel better, my uncle had 8 of them.
Damn, I bet that was fun
"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas
<span> </span>
DuracellEnergizer said:
I've read that Carrie Fisher was considered for the role of Lois Lane in the '78 Superman film. I wish she had gotten the part; I can't stand Margot Kidder or her homely Keith Richards face.
I respectfully disagree! She looked darn good.
Only a year after Star Wars, audiences might not have been able to imagine Princess Leia playing Lois Lane. They cast an unknown to play Superman for a reason.
The woman deserves a lot of respect her loyalty to Richard Donner in the Superman II debacle. Being reduced to a cameo in Superman III was the result.
Where were you in '77?
TV's Frink said:
DuracellEnergizer said:
I've read that Carrie Fisher was considered for the role of Lois Lane in the '78 Superman film. I wish she had gotten the part;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9KVIfpNG4w
I can't stand Margot Kidder or her homely Keith Richards face.
SilverWook said:
DuracellEnergizer said:
I've read that Carrie Fisher was considered for the role of Lois Lane in the '78 Superman film. I wish she had gotten the part; I can't stand Margot Kidder or her homely Keith Richards face.
I respectfully disagree! She looked darn good.
Only a year after Star Wars, audiences might not have been able to imagine Princess Leia playing Lois Lane. They cast an unknown to play Superman for a reason.
The woman deserves a lot of respect her loyalty to Richard Donner in the Superman II debacle. Being reduced to a cameo in Superman III was the result.
Yeah and while Amy Adams my be my favorite live action Lois Lane I have to say she had great chemistry with Reeves and really sold me on the idea that she was a tough as nails reporter who had a softer side most people didn't see. She was great.
Actresses should be cast for how well they play the part, not their looks. To me I think the character of Lois works better when she is not the most stunning woman on the planet, because it shows that what Superman is seeing is her character not her looks. To me it has always seemed like that would be the most important thing to Superman.
If you want actresses who are cast for nothing more then their looks because you think the only purpose woman serve in the world is to give you something to jerk off to and then it is there job to sit down and shut up until the next time you need sexual pleasure then please stick to watching porn and leave real films alone.
Furthermore, she's not half bad looking anyway. Comparing her to Keith Richards is just stupid.
TV's Frink said:
Furthermore, she's not half bad looking anyway. Comparing her to Keith Richards is just stupid.
Exactly ..... the movie would have had to of been banned if Superman ended up doing Keith Richards instead of Lois Lane.
;)
DrCrowTStarwars said:
Yeah and while Amy Adams my be my favorite live action Lois Lane I have to say she had great chemistry with Reeves and really sold me on the idea that she was a tough as nails reporter who had a softer side most people didn't see. She was great.
Actresses should be cast for how well they play the part, not their looks. To me I think the character of Lois works better when she is not the most stunning woman on the planet, because it shows that what Superman is seeing is her character not her looks. To me it has always seemed like that would be the most important thing to Superman.
If you want actresses who are cast for nothing more then their looks because you think the only purpose woman serve in the world is to give you something to jerk off to and then it is there job to sit down and shut up until the next time you need sexual pleasure then please stick to watching porn and leave real films alone.
Well, I guess I should be a little more fair -- I don't hate her performance, it just doesn't do anything for me. As for her looks, the "Keith Richards" thing was me talking in a pissy mood; she's about average, no worse than that.
I suppose my beef with her performance isn't even her fault, really. I simply do not like the Lois/Clark/Superman relationship of the Chris Reeve films, which hinges on the idea of Clark being a disguise and Superman the real identity. I simply hate that characterization, so anything which builds off of it isn't going to sit well with me.
I don't like her eyeshadow.
K. Let’s have this ride.
What an odd complaint.
It was the best I could do
K. Let’s have this ride.
^I don't like the lack of a period at the end of your sentence.
.
K. Let’s have this ride.
DuracellEnergizer said:
^I don't like the lack of a period at the end of your sentence.
This seems to be an internet problem. Posters on this site and others, which I otherwise like and enjoy, do this all the time and it drives me up a wall.
I dated this girl for two years, and we just got out of our relationship after I discovered that she'd been cheating on me with her boss, who is in his thirties. It's a terrible feeling.