logo Sign In

How do others see the originaltrilogy.com community? — Page 11

Author
Time

Actually, I was impressed by the fair number of responses on TFN that were more moderate, and even some expressing our views.  It's probably just as easy for us to assume that they are all raving mad (because of a few loud idiots) as it is for them to think that we all subscribe to the "r..... my childhood" view.

"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars

Author
Time

Baronlando said:

Hah, long ago Cryogenic flipped OUT on me over who knows what, complete with hysterical, rambling PM messages. It was probably right about the time he became aware I was here too, and hence UNMUTUAL to the church. (on a surprisingly related note, go see THE MASTER). So to answer the question in the topic, we are seen as really, really bad people.  

 

If we're all UNMUTUAL, does that make George Number Two, and Skywalker Ranch The Village? ;)

I've had large weather balloons following me around lately...

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:

Actually, I was impressed by the fair number of responses on TFN that were more moderate, and even some expressing our views.  It's probably just as easy for us to assume that they are all raving mad (because of a few loud idiots) as it is for them to think that we all subscribe to the "r..... my childhood" view.

Maybe the place has gotten better since I stopped paying attention around 2008 or so...every time I check it out though I see the same thing, and nothing interesting regardless. I guess, to be fair, that you could never replicate the discussion quality post-prequel as you could when they were coming out, but even in the classic trilogy forums things seem a bit dull these days. I think part of the problem is that the real hardcore SW fans--the first and second generation OT fans--are too old now. They don't post. If you were 25 in 2002, you'd be at least 35 now, and likely have  a career, a mortgage, two kids, and god knows what other problems, so you aren't online talking about Star Wars issues. Instead, it is the people born in the 1990s, which, to take nothing away from them, just isn't the same.

Author
Time

zombie84 said:

you'd be at least 35 now,

Check.

and likely have  a career,

Check.

a mortgage,

Check.

two kids,

Check.

and god knows what other problems,

You have no idea.

so you aren't online talking about Star Wars issues.

:-(

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Been in a discussion all day with some Lucas apologist on Reddit's /r/StarWars. In all honesty it is probably Obi-Rob.

I usually try to stay out of it, and his viewpoint is not the popular one, but I saw the chance to get the word out about the cause, but the amount of unfounded anger the guy has towards us is just crazy. All I've been doing is explaining our viewpoints and wants and he's just been going insane, more or less.

Crazy.

 

Link.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

 

zombie84 said:

you'd be at least 35 now,

unCheck.

and likely have  a career,

unCheck.

a mortgage,

unCheck.

two kids,

unCheck.

and god knows what other problems,

ok, probably. (but not really)

so you aren't online talking about Star Wars issues.

pretty much, everyday..

later

-1

[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]

Author
Time

@Tyrphanax: Nice try, but that guy is so incredibly narrow-minded, ignorant and angry that it's a waste of time to try to have a serious discussion with him.

Author
Time

Yikes. It's definitely the same guy. Ironically he's probably good for us, we look pretty reasonable next to that. He sure ain't doing his side any favors.