logo Sign In

Harmy's THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK Despecialized Edition HD - V2.0 - MKV & AVCHD (Released) — Page 68

Author
Time

Just watched the comparison video and some of the workprint (will watch the rest later). Awesome work, thanks again Harmy.

Author
Time

This is neither a "preservation", nor a "fan edit". Its a recreation.

A preservation is impossible, at this stage, and a fan edit implies the liberal use of artistic license.

The only artistry here is in the intuition Harmy employs in his stunning work and the level of compromise he feels is acceptable in trying to reproduce the artistic choices of others.

As for the "corners" issue, I had to go back and look at the screenshots to even see what people were referring to. My thoughts?

If they're seriously enough to sully one's joy in this project, I'd suggest they see a therapist and have themselves professionally diagnosed.

Author
Time

I own 70mm SW frames, and guess what? Rounded corners. Puggo's 16mm preservations have them too. Can't recall even a peep about that.

This could easily rival the Barry Lyndon aspect ratio controversy, if we let it. (Google it.) This will only derail the thread, and lead to hurt feelings. Please, take the high road for a change.

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

hairy_hen said:

The level of nitpicking that goes on never ceases to amaze me.

If Harmy is going to be called out for something so miniscule, then I might as well be taken to task for the 5.1 tracks that accompany these releases. 

 I can't speak for Tyrphanax but I've never listened to your 5.1 tracks. I always go for the mono.

As it happens, film prints actually do have rounded corners, and given that these movies were shot on film, it's not like such a thing is coming out of nowhere.

Except it did come out of nowhere. No home release of any film I can think of has done such a thing. None of the previous releases of SWDE had such cropping. Will there be a 2.7 release that adds it in?

At the end of the day, this is not a complete restoration as such.  The stated goal is to recreate the experience of watching the original versions of the movies, starting from the special edition and working backwards.

If we're going to start altering the film to recreate the original theater going experience why not lose some of the clarity of the picture and add in dirt and scratches to more closely approximate a print of the film that's been running in the theater for a while?

As for this being some kind of minuscule nitpicking. There's a difference between having to make a compromise because of the sources you have to work with and making your own creative decisions to alter the film for no reason other than your own tastes. And that distinction is an important one.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Tobar said:

If we're going to start altering the film to recreate the original theater going experience why not lose some of the clarity of the picture and add in dirt and scratches to more closely approximate a print of the film that's been running in the theater for a while?

 Dude, he's trying to recreate the film as it was shown in theatres in 1980, not some print that's been lying on a shelf for over three decades.

Author
Time

Not sure if anybody encountered this but when loaded on ipad as mp4 the playback freezes then turns black. the audio track is still going though. It's fine when played on the pc as the same file. 

Thank you so much for doing this, it's incredible. 

Author
Time

ricsim88 said:

Not sure if anybody encountered this but when loaded on ipad as mp4 the playback freezes then turns black. the audio track is still going though. It's fine when played on the pc as the same file. 

Thank you so much for doing this, it's incredible. 

 No problem here.  What app are you using to play it with?

I've played it successfully with CineXPlayer and VLC.

Subscribe to HarmyNews!

“Evacuate ...in our moment of triumph? I think you overestimate their chances.”

Author
Time

I was using just the ipad player, but now thanks to you I'm using VLC and it works great. Fantastic. 

Thanks  a lot for the fast reply. Film looks great. 

Author
Time

Welcome!  Glad you got it working.

Subscribe to HarmyNews!

“Evacuate ...in our moment of triumph? I think you overestimate their chances.”

Author
Time

I absolutely cannot wait for the full release. Better than Christmas!

Author
Time

Tyrphanax said:

I acknowledge that the change is a very small one, but it is not inconsequential; it completely flies in the face of a preservation effort when you make a change other than one to preserve the film, especially if that change is intended to alter the viewer's perception of the film.

Actually, it is the very definition of inconsequential! -- it's not a significant loss of picture. At 1916 x 812 of active picture it amounts to about 19 pixels completely blacked out in the upper left corner, 6 in the lower left, 4 in the upper right, and 9 in the lower right. That's 38 pixels out of 1,555,792 or 0.002%. That's two thousandths of a percent!

Author
Time

Guys, can we please stop going crazy over the rounded corners? Most of you didn't even notice until they were pointed out to you. It's nitpicking about something that seriously is not a big deal. If you really don't like them then you can crop the .002% of the image that has them and still enjoy an enormous amount of footage that Harmy has reintroduced into the film that otherwise you wouldn't have outside the GOUT.  Remember that Harmy is doing this for the love of Star Wars just like the rest of you. This isn't his job and he is not your employee. If he feels it better represents the original film, then he can add the small rounded corners and you really have no room to complain when he is already doing such a huge service to the fans.  Just accept that complaining about the rounded corners is not helpful and get back to talking about more constructive topics. 

Author
Time

Zer0Squared said:

ricsim88 said:

Not sure if anybody encountered this but when loaded on ipad as mp4 the playback freezes then turns black. the audio track is still going though. It's fine when played on the pc as the same file. 

Thank you so much for doing this, it's incredible. 

 No problem here.  What app are you using to play it with?

I've played it successfully with CineXPlayer and VLC.

 Forgot to mention. Tried to play it from ps3 to tv with same result. No picture whatsoever. Should I try saving it as a mts?

thanks

Author
Time

I haven't watched the entire movie but what I have seen I must say is simply beautiful!!! I will join in the sentiments that this is the best the original movie has ever looked. I am so glad you are doing this!!!! I'm astounded how crisp and clean a lot of the model works seems to be, almost as if the original pieces were used to recomposite them.  Excellent job!!!!!

So far, the only problem I've seen, are some boxes around the AT-AT's through one of the cockpits.  I believe it's the scene where Luke is crashing, but not sure.

Author
Time

I think this debate over the rounded corners has gotten a bit too heated on both sides. I wouldn't have added the rounded corners, but it's pretty minor in the scheme of things and obviously doesn't detract substantially from the amazing work harmy is doing and from which we are all benefiting. On the other hand, this is a forum in which to discuss harmy's work, and so if people want to comment on the corners, they should be free to do so (politely of course). 

Author
Time

DavidMerrick said:

Tobar said:

If we're going to start altering the film to recreate the original theater going experience why not lose some of the clarity of the picture and add in dirt and scratches to more closely approximate a print of the film that's been running in the theater for a while?

 Dude, he's trying to recreate the film as it was shown in theatres in 1980, not some print that's been lying on a shelf for over three decades.

 Personally I don't have a problem with having rounded corners or the absence of scratches and dirt. But just for the sake of argument, keep in mind that a given film print can easily go through a projector more than 150 times in its first month of release, and it won't be run through a brand-new projector unboxed specifically for that print. Most of the people who watched a film during its initial theatrical release would have seen noticeable levels of dirt and scratches on the print, especially later in the run.

Author
Time

I'm not really a fan of the rounded corners. I think the film should look as close as possible to a pristine scan of the o-neg, not a theatrical print. That said, it's Harmy's project and he can do what he wants and I'll still watch it regardless.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

It's a questionable choice, I admit, but definitely not as devastating as others seem to think. Anyway, I don't think there is anything left to discuss on this matter until Harmy says anything else about it. We've pretty much talked to death about it.

Author
Time

About the corners I'll just weigh in on the side that says I don't like it, but I can live with it. It seems like an odd personal choice that doesn't really fit with what I understood the spirit of this project to be, but it's Harmy's project at the end of the day so who am I to say?

George creates Star Wars.
Star Wars creates fans.
George destroys Star Wars.
Fans destroy George.
Fans create Star Wars.

Author
Time

What is the goal of Harmy's re-creations?

- To create versions of the movies which are as close to the theatrical versions as possible

Do the theatrical versions have rounded corners?

- Yes, they do.

So what the f*** are you arguing about?

BTW I'm pretty sure 99% of those who complain didn't notice it until they read it here

Author
Time

Turisu said:

About the corners I'll just weigh in on the side that says I don't like it, but I can live with it. It seems like an odd personal choice that doesn't really fit with what I understood the spirit of this project to be, but it's Harmy's project at the end of the day so who am I to say?

 I agree with this post.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Here's the last thing I'll say about it.

From the beginning the goal of the project was to restore the films as much as possible to their original theatrical presentations in as high a quality as possible.

Painstaking work was put into fixing the myriad problems and changes the films have suffered over the years.

Some guesswork was required and was inevitable but until now there were no changes done to the films just on a whim.

Restraining ourselves from changing things just for our own tastes in our restoration efforts is what separates us from the Camerons and Lucases of the world.

I can just imagine what Lucas' reaction would be if he were to ever see this. He'd probably laugh and think to himself how even these people who claim they want the originals can't even help themselves from altering the films to their own liking.

To those that say, "oh you probably never would have even noticed it!" No one would have ever noticed the random changing of the color of the Saurian's shirts in the Mos Eisley Cantina if it hadn't been pointed out. Does it make that change okay since next to no one would have ever noticed it?

It's excessive cropping of the image and a loss of image information. To those that say, just crop it out yourself, that would entail an even bigger loss of image information. The shape of projector screens is not relevant in that the vast majority of the people who will ever watch these projects will do so on monitors and television sets. It wasn't done for technical reasons, just aesthetic ones.

It was a change for the sake of change and is antithetical to what a restoration project is all about.

Forum Moderator