logo Sign In

Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released) — Page 426

Author
Time

Or maybe re-instal Firefox, because I'm using Firefox and have no trouble with the gallery.

Author
Time

I have re-installed Firefox for crashes like this before, the Google+ crash never goes away. I don't really care that much since I don't like Google+ or use it much. I just use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome if I have to use Google+.

Author
Time

George Lucas really put the "edit" in "Special Edition".

Author
Time

AntcuFaalb said:

Ugh, the comments. Why do people keep calling this (and other projects like it) an "edit"?

Well, technically this did start life as a Special Edition version of the film that has been edited to remove all the revisionist garbage. But yes, it is annoying to see something referred to as an edit when its (amazingly successful) goal is to be a restoration.

Author
Time

some guy said:

Harmy is nerd royalty as far as I'm concerned

 

That's the best one so far.

 

Fanrestore - Fan Restoration Forum: https://fanrestore.com

Author
Time

dblake83 said:

analog said: I was going to try this for kicks, just to see if it'd work, but get a "matroska parse error: invalid h264 NAL unit size. NAL unit truncated" error :(

Will wait for the "real deal" in any case... Just wanted to see if there was a quick way to burn for playback on a standalone player. Ah well.

 

The NAL error is due to header compression that newer versions of MKVtool kit thus mkvmerge now uses by default.

You simply need to remove it.

Here is how:  In mkvmerge, under options [file->options] on the mmg tab look for "Disable header removal compression for audio and video tracks by default" and check the box. Then in main window add your .mkv and "start muxing" it will be somewhat fast as in this case it will just be changing the header not really doing a mux

Here is the commandline method:

mkvmerge --compression 0:none --compression 1:none -o "path and file name of new .mkv aka output file" "path and file name of the mkv file to be processed aka imput file"

BTW: I use mkvmerge 4.70 besides it being rock solid stable, mkv's made from later versions will not fast forward >> or reverse properly << on my Blu-Ray player.

 

P.S. It's worth spending 1-2 hours to figure out how to use MultiAVCHD for the do-it-yourself menu. You'll be able to use the knowledge for future endevours. Of course, I had to limit the audio choices down to 6 due as that's all that will display, but it's great solution until an "official" one is available from Harmy and his helpers. 

 

Righto. Yeah, I went with a quick tsmuxer disc, just to mess with. Seemed good on ps3. Spent some time looking at multiavchd, specifically hunting for tweaks to the menu limit. It's likely possible with an avisynth tweak. Worth asking the author.

As for reasons this version is worthwhile, everyone has their reasons. I also like the team blu effort, for example, but this one is interesting in the results of the unique and determined results of so much extra effort. I have to say, 2.5 was quite enjoyable last night. 

...interesting article. Still don't think attention is anything to worry about. 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

yoda-sama said:

Not sure if anyone else has noticed this yet, but the project is getting a little more attention (a coworker that didn't know about this project or that I follow it found this article and showed it to me). 

http://penny-arcade.com/report/article/the-making-of-the-best-version-of-star-wars...-which-of-course-you-cant-get

 

press or publicity for projects like this is never good. I've seen too many dissapper under a flood of C&D's and other legal assaults as a result of getting noticed....

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I find it impossible to believe Lucasfilm doesn't know about it, though. Maybe someone at Disney would take notice, but my assumption (which is just that) has always been that they just don't consider it enough of a threat to their business to risk angering their most loving fans. I guess if the DeEd got so popular that thousands of people were downloading it, but even then, that would just prove there's a market for releasing the original film properly.

But that's me talking from a place of common sense, a concept which is in very short supply in the US these days.

Author
Time

It would kinda suck if Disney took this away from Harmy to release officially but even though it is official and all it is Harmy's work so they would have to get his permission to do that.

What’s worse George Lucas changing the OT or selling the rights to Disney

Author
Time

I though Lucas has always had a very open policy on these type of projects (other than 35mm film being shown). Have they every gone after such a project before?

Author
Time

<blockquote><p><strong>cain spaans</strong> said:</p><p>It would kinda suck if Disney took this away from Harmy to release officially but even though it is official and all it is Harmy's work so they would have to get his permission to do that.</p></blockquote><p> </p>

Technically they could release it without his permission, as the material is all officially theirs. Hell, I bet Harmy would be thrilled! It would be great publicity for him and all others on this project and validate their diligence.

Author
Time

Well I just finished watching v2.5 and I must hand it to you Harmy it is brilliant work you achieved. I understand you said this had little difference to v2.1 but I thought I saw a lot of difference, it looked almost like 1080p rather than 720p and I can't wait til ESB 2.0 and ROTJ 2.0 come out.

What’s worse George Lucas changing the OT or selling the rights to Disney

Author
Time

Hi,

Is there a list of chapter titles available? I'm not seeing anything when viewing in VLC, and it'd be great to have them. 

Thanks again for another awesome release!

 

Author
Time

cain spaans said:

It would kinda suck if Disney took this away from Harmy to release officially but even though it is official and all it is Harmy's work so they would have to get his permission to do that.

Does anyone believe that Disney would do a better or more complete job than what was accomplished here?  Sorry, but I don't see it no matter who is or isn't involved with this franchise at this point.

I will grant that they probably have access to more resources, better source media and all that, but look at all the garbage HD releases out there that claim to be the cats pajamas.  Far too many if you ask me.

More thanks that I have go to Harmy for saving this piece of cinematic history.

Author
Time

I know the proper channels and all, but ignoring all that, gosh, I can't believe I have to ask this, myspleen has apparently forgotten me already, even though I've been uploading solidly since I grabbed 2.1 (and on other star wars related things as well)...  I just don't get it...  Anyway, anyone mind inviting me back so I can grab 2.5?  Actually, why the hell am I still uploading if it counts for nothing?  This is twice now...

Anyway, if anyone can help who is familiar with me, I'd appreciate it.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

yoda-sama said:

myspleen has apparently forgotten me already

Just like you've obviously forgotten that there's a Myspleen invite thread ;)

Still, PM sent.

Author
Time

guiser said:



Does anyone believe that Disney would do a better or more complete job than what was accomplished here?  Sorry, but I don't see it no matter who is or isn't involved with this franchise at this point.

I will grant that they probably have access to more resources, better source media and all that, but look at all the garbage HD releases out there that claim to be the cats pajamas.  Far too many if you ask me.

More thanks that I have go to Harmy for saving this piece of cinematic history.


Sorry but this was a pretty dumb question.

Author
Time

guiser said:

cain spaans said:

It would kinda suck if Disney took this away from Harmy to release officially but even though it is official and all it is Harmy's work so they would have to get his permission to do that.

Does anyone believe that Disney would do a better or more complete job than what was accomplished here?  Sorry, but I don't see it no matter who is or isn't involved with this franchise at this point.

I will grant that they probably have access to more resources, better source media and all that, but look at all the garbage HD releases out there that claim to be the cats pajamas.  Far too many if you ask me.

More thanks that I have go to Harmy for saving this piece of cinematic history.

Because Disney's about to blow one of the greatest goodwill stunts they possibly could do with Star Wars. A release of the theatricals is essentially a get out of jail free card for Disney if they really piss the fanbase off.

Author
Time

I do believe they could do better than this, seeing as how I'm using old LD masters for many shots and the whole thing is still a bit of a patch-work.

On the other hand I am afraid that they could very well screw up royally - imagine if they just went the easy way and pulled some old faded print, scanned it quicky, did some quick over-all adjustment to counteract the fading and then, because a theatrical print would be pretty grainy and soft, they'd put the whole thing through aggressive DVNR and edge enhancement - that stuff just haunts my nightmares.

It would be the GOUT all over again, except this time it would be to BD what the GOUT was to DVD - and again we would be the bad guys for complaining, because we "got" what we "wanted" and still find stuff to complain about.

I think it would be best if they outsourced it to Criterion, but that's probably not going to happen.

I actually feel quite certain that the way things are going with fan preservations, the studios will soon have a hell of a hard time to make a more quality release and would really have to go the extra mile to surpass the fan efforts - we're not there yet but given some time, we could be.

Author
Time

Harmy said:

I actually feel quite certain that the way things are going with fan preservations, the studios will soon have a hell of a hard time to make a more quality release and would really have to go the extra mile to surpass the fan efforts - we're not there yet but given some time, we could be.

We're very, very close, at least in terms of many catalogue titles. Some studios lavish lush attention, others grab what they have, scrub it and toss it on a disc. Others seem to go out of their way to ruin something that already worked fine (Conan the Barbarian!?!).

“That’s impossible, even for a computer!”

“You don't do ‘Star Wars’ in Dobly.”