- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
Check your PM, Harmy.
I've sent you the PCM for Star Wars. I'll have the rest for you tomorrow.
Check your PM, Harmy.
I've sent you the PCM for Star Wars. I'll have the rest for you tomorrow.
@h_h: Whatever you say, pal, I'm really clueless in this area and lossless quality with smaller bitrate definitely sounds good. And if you can provide lossless files for the other two original mixes, that's great and I'll trust you that those will be sourced from the best available sources (I'm really interested in what will be your source for lossless 77 stereo?).
@Krycek87: Thanks mate :-)
The rendering is finished (average speed 0.77 fps, pretty horrible) and skimming through the test mkv mux, everything seems in order. I'll probably watch the whole thing later today (reluctantly I must say, as I'm quite tired of watching the film looking for mistakes) and as soon as I get the ac3 files from h_h, I'll be able to start the upload, so hopefully I will meet the 28th August release date :-)
Harmy when he finds another encoding glitch:
[nevermind, the flipping-over-a-table ascii didnt seem to work]
JK! Very exciting! Can't wait to have a movie night with this one!! Just had a nice little discussion about OT vs SE the other night, my family was already "in the know" and cant wait for a good close-to-OT viewing of SW!
Quick! Someone find another redshirt!
Harmy said:
and as soon as I get the ac3 files from h_h, I'll be able to start the upload, so hopefully I will meet the 28th August release date :-)
Sweet!
“I find your lack of faith disturbing.”
I'm thinking after this project, Harmy isn't going to watch Star Wars for a very long time! LOL
b0bafett said:
I'm thinking after this project, Harmy isn't going to watch Star Wars for a very long time! LOL
Yes, but when he does it will be a very special treat!
Yes :-)
Congrats on the successful encode!
Just curious, how big is the file (without audio, of course)?
13.5GB and around 16GB with AC3 audio :-)
Harmy said:
13.5GB and around 16GB with AC3 audio :-)
Wow, so the mkv is done already ? Great :-)
Harmy said:
13.5GB and around 16GB with AC3 audio :-)
Damn big for a 720p! I think this is going too look very very good on my 100" screen
<p>I'm sorry for asking this again, and I can't seem to find it anywhere, but when were you hoping to have the AVCHD ready? Thanks.</p>
<p> </p>
^ I believe the plan is still for this Tuesday, the 28th.
*edit - whoops, you were asking about the avchd, not the mkv. Harmy said a week or two after the mkv.
“In the future it will become even easier for old negatives to become lost and be “replaced” by new altered negatives. This would be a great loss to our society. Our cultural history must not be allowed to be rewritten.” - George Lucas
so dumb question, what is the difference between mkv and AVCHD? Excuse my noobiness
slynger said:
so dumb question, what is the difference between mkv and AVCHD? Excuse my noobiness
I believe the mkv will just be a video file. The AVCHD is formatted specifically to be burned to a disc for playing in a Blu-Ray player.
slynger said:
so dumb question, what is the difference between mkv and AVCHD? Excuse my noobiness
Two different container formats. AVCHD is essentially a stripped-down Bluray that can fit on DVD; the container was originally created for digicams to record HD video directly to DVDs I believe. MKV = Matroska Video (like the dolls). An advanced container format typically used across teh Interwebs for all manner of HD content. The AVCHD will likely be more compatible with some Bluray players, and the MKV will have more audio tracks, a higher bitrate, and slightly easier playback on PCs via VLC/MPC (imho better seeking than the avchd's mt2s file)
Originally said, 'The AVCHD will likely be more compatible with some Blurays." I meant, with some Bluray players, not with the the BD spec; the video inside in the MKV is already spec compliant, as Harmy noted below. Wasn't trying to say anything different.
“I find your lack of faith disturbing.”
Well, in this case, since the mkv encode is BD compliant and could therefore be remuxed to AVCHD or BD, the only difference is bitrate and container. In other words, the MKV will be twice the size (and quality) and will only be playable in some BD and DVD players (most modern BD players can play MKVs) but the AVCHD will be burnable to a DVD9 and playable in vast majority of BD players.
Sounds great. So Harmy man, what's the plan for the BD version (with the menu's, etc.)? Are you planning to jump right into it or are you going to take a breather before you put it together?
looking for HDTV of the Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith. Also HDTV of The Lord of the Rings trilogy
I think Harmy said end of september for the BD, but he needs to find bonus content.
"Let's face it, the Ewoks sucked, dude" -Hurley, Lost 5x13-Some like it Hoth.
Please bear with me if I tend to get too excited about anything or say too much, I have issues.
I'm not taking a breather at all, I'm studying for my final exams that take place on the 5th September and I definitely don't plan to start any work until after that :-)
And I don't really need to find bonus content as much as create it :-)
Here's the plan for the BD:
Animated Menu (similar to the sample I posted some time ago)
Same video for the main feature as the MKV
All the same soundtracks and subtitles as the MKV but the original three English mixes in lossless and maybe the 93 mix as well and maybe some of the other AC3s in higher bitrate.
A short making of video (HD)
A trailer (HD)
The v1.0 comparison gallery (the one on picasaweb)
New comparison gallery (comparing SE, GOUT, v1.0 and v2.0)
A video comparison of the despecialized shots (1080p) (comparing SE, GOUT, v1.0 and v2.0 - the above gallery will comprise of screenshots from this video)
At least one easter egg (I have something really fun in mind, though I could use help of someone with musical talent)
I'm open to other suggestions of course but I can't promise anything.
As you can see, it will take some time to finish the BD but it should be worth the wait :-)