logo Sign In

Good comparison website — Page 2

Author
Time
Post link
"The text on the revised Jawa sandcrawler shot is amusing, as the "technological" improvement involved was simply reshooting the original miniature from a different angle."

And that's one of the additions that I think is good. Why couldn't they have reshot the original models likewise in some of the other alterations instead of using soon to obsolete CG. I mean, considering the improvement of the model work with the second death star attack in Return of the Jedi, by 1994, they could have greatly improved many effects shots without "cheating" and using technology that was not available at the time. I'm sure it would have been possible with current effects knowledge to use only 1977 technology to get better than 1977 results. (And most likely better than a lot of 1997 results too.)

Take back the trilogy. Execute Order '77

http://www.youtube.com/user/Knightmessenger

Author
Time
Post link
Sluggo said:

The official site has a feature on the changes as well. There is a bit of bias and quite a lot of aggravating things if you read between the lines, but I learned a bunch of new things.
click here


They're REALLY proud of the digital tunnel extension in the detention block. 13 examples.

My outlook on life - we’re all on the Hindenburg anyway…no point fighting over the window seat.

Author
Time
Post link
Ziz said:

Sluggo said:

The official site has a feature on the changes as well. There is a bit of bias and quite a lot of aggravating things if you read between the lines, but I learned a bunch of new things.
click here


They're REALLY proud of the digital tunnel extension in the detention block. 13 examples.
LOL- I didn't even notice it 'till someone pointed it out to me. :-P