- Time
- Post link
Pfft... wanton censorship as predicted. I guess Administration Staff is really Antimatter himself. Right?
<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>
Extremely Silly Website: digital-fanedits.com (Was: Extremely Silly Article About Star Wars Prologue On DVD) — Page 4
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
That's my assumption.
It will be interesting to see where this goes from here. If Vflix fixes the article, I don't have any problem with the removal of my comment (though I don't know what "public content policy" I violated).
If the article stays as is, I'll probably end up getting myself banned. ;-)
- Time
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
Admin. Staff Said:
2011-08-22 11:27:31
The information you posted has been removed to conform to our public content policy. However, the details you provided will be forwarded to the author of this article for review.:-/
Jeez. This is worse than that time I was on that star trek forum and had to say only nice things about the shitty last series of Doctor Who or else I'd get banned.
I got banned.
- Time
- Post link
Has there been a LAST series? Or do you just mean last season?
- Time
- Post link
And why would you get banned on a Star Trek forum for talking Doctor Who smack?
- Time
- Post link
And why go on a Star Trek or Doctor Who forum period? ;)
- Time
- Post link
Presented without comment...
VFlix Said:
2011-08-22 13:36:32Thank you for calling the factual error to my attention. I have executed a simple revision that corrects the error and produces a more effective and truthful article.
In June, 2009, Anti-Matter released his first fanedit title, Star Wars Prologue. Following several lackluster 3-in-1 cuts, it was the first critically-received Star Wars prequel trilogy edit published into the fanedit community, sparking almost instant, insolent condemnation from competing fanedit websites that continues to this day.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
Critically received = by my 3 friends..
How can something that's never been released be instantly condemned, or even.. well received for that matter?
Serious, and simultaneous delusions of persecution and grandeur..
- Time
- Post link
My favorite word in the article is now "insolent."
- Time
- Post link
VFlix Said:
2011-08-22 13:36:32Thank you for calling the factual error to my attention. I have executed a simple revision that corrects the error and produces a more effective and truthful article.In June, 2009, Anti-Matter released his first fanedit title, Star Wars Prologue. Following several lackluster 3-in-1 cuts, it was the first critically-received Star Wars prequel trilogy edit published into the fanedit community, sparking almost instant, insolent condemnation from competing fanedit websites that continues to this day.
God, this is hilarious. I don't think the Monty Python team could have written a funnier response, and so quickly! This guy's good.
I've often thought that if we ever get organized enough to have an OT convention, we should invite kenkraly to be a guest keynote speaker. Now I'm not sure, maybe we should invite anti-matter instead.
"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
Well all that confirms that Anti-matter is truly the biggest egotistical knob jockey of the fan editing community. But what made me laugh was the line .." competing fan editing websites...". lol. I really wouldn't say that there is much of a competition when his site has fuck all members compared to the other sites. And his only seems to have his own edits and a few others on there. Can't really call that incestuous site much of a fan community. say anything negative and get banned. You must stroke Ant-Matters ego to become privileged.
Now, i haven't seen his edit but the way that they are bigging it up you would think it was the second coming. What a Wanker.
Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:
I've often thought that if we ever get organized enough to have an OT convention, we should invite kenkraly to be a guest keynote speaker. Now I'm not sure, maybe we should invite anti-matter instead.
He would probably only come if he had top billing, provided with a huge throne that would need to be situated away from anyone else in the prime position and if anyone mentioned any other fan editors or say that they didn't like one of his edits then they would have to get instantly evicted.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
I should point out that VFlix and Anti-Matter appear to be two different people...but I assume Anti-Matter has final word on any changes VFlix makes to his article.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
I should point out that VFlix and Anti-Matter appear to be two different people...but I assume Anti-Matter has final word on any changes VFlix makes to his article.
The way VFlix constantly kisses Anti-splatters ass i think they are probably in a civil partnership ;)
- Time
- Post link
VFlix said:
In June, 2009, Anti-Matter released his first fanedit title, Star Wars Prologue. Following several lackluster 3-in-1 cuts, it was the first critically-received Star Wars prequel trilogy edit published into the fanedit community, sparking almost instant, insolent condemnation from competing fanedit websites that continues to this day.
"Several lackluster?" That's a bit of a rude assumption. Still, I suppose it's a slight admission of not being first.
"Instant, Insolent condemnation?" Didn't ot.com members read his thread until he insolently snubbed us for know apparent reason other than demanding more attention?
"Competing fanedit websites?" Yeah, sorry but I never heard of his website until this thread... Fanedit.org and here are the main hubs last time I checked. I'm not sure about fanedit.org, but we have 7,518 members... digital-fanedits has only 185. They're roughly .02461 of our size!
- Time
- Post link
The Aluminum Falcon said:
"Competing fanedit websites?" Yeah, sorry but I never heard of his website until this thread... Fanedit.org and here are the main hubs last time I checked. I'm not sure about fanedit.org, but we have 7,518 members... digital-fanedits has only 185. They're roughly .02461 of our size!
- FE.org Members
- 9,734
- Time
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
- FE.org Members
- 9,734
WOW! I didn't know it was that much bigger than ot.com... Anyway, it just proves my point though. His site has .019 amount the members fanedit.org has.
- Time
- Post link
Not that it's a measure of anything useful, but I have more posts at FE.org than their entire site. I'm not sure what that says about me, but I know what it says about their site.
- Time
- Post link
L8wrtr said:
Not that it's a measure of anything useful, but I have more posts at FE.org than their entire site. I'm not sure what that says about me, but I know what it says about their site.
Out of curiosity, how many posts are on their site?
- Time
- Post link
As of today, Digital Fanedits Forum stats:
Total Topics: 146
Total Posts: 1420
Total Members 177
Users Online
Most online today: 5
Most ever: 42 (December 19, 2010)
(at the time I did looked at this, 4 guests, 0 Users)
- Time
- Post link
Anti-matter is really messy stuff.
An old pal of mine ended up in a whole universe of the stuff and it destroyed his entire body.
Only his ego survived.
I fear this is what has happened here.
- Time
- Post link
L8wrtr said:
As of today, Digital Fanedits Forum stats:
Total Topics: 146
Total Posts: 1420
Total Members 177
I dont get it. This is such a small hobby, with a relatively small group of enthusiasts. Why draw the little turf-war lines?
I understand that for antimatter it was some kind of ego/tantrum thing. But the 177 members over there... do THEY have some kind of "us/them" mentality as well? I don't know, but it would be sad.
- Time
- Post link
TheBoost said:
L8wrtr said:
As of today, Digital Fanedits Forum stats:
Total Topics: 146
Total Posts: 1420
Total Members 177
I dont get it. This is such a small hobby, with a relatively small group of enthusiasts. Why draw the little turf-war lines?
I understand that for antimatter it was some kind of ego/tantrum thing. But the 177 members over there... do THEY have some kind of "us/them" mentality as well? I don't know, but it would be sad.
Well, I don't think those 177 are active. It seems like there are only 5 or so regulars that actually post.
- Time
- Post link
Wait a minute...
So, Frink corrects them on the issue of this supposedly being the first 3-in-1 edit, and only hours later they correct themselves and declare that it's actually the first good 3-in-1 edit?
If they weren't aware of the existence of the other edits until Frink informed them, how could they have possibly gotten access to and made a judgement on the other edits within a few hours?!
I would guess that downloading just one would take some time, and then with the runtime added to that it's unlikely they could have even watched a single one of these edits before declaring them all "lacklustre".
My brain is collapsing in on itself.
- Time
- Post link
And now comments have been disabled. Palm, meet face.
- Time
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
Palm, meet face.
I wonder if he's going to start claiming his Star Trek edits are the only well-received ones; forget Bionic Bob... (whose edits I recently saw and thought very good btw). Speaking of Star Trek...
