Does Tom Have That Right? — Page 3

xhonzi said:

TheBoost said:

In the OP, would the Doctor actually be KILLING Daleks? Or preventing them from ever existing?

It seems to me the morallity of those two actions, while perhaps similar, aren't the same thing.

Sort of the difference between not shooting a 5 year old kid and not getting your wife/girlfriend/mistress/neighbour preggers?

Only in this case the five year old is a production line of wiggly little balls of genetically engineered hate waiting to be plugged into be-weaponed baby walkers.

I say yes. They're freakind DALEKS. Fry the buggers.

Gay Dalek says :

You vicious old queen!

xhonzi said:

TheBoost said:

In the OP, would the Doctor actually be KILLING Daleks? Or preventing them from ever existing?

It seems to me the morallity of those two actions, while perhaps similar, aren't the same thing.

Sort of the difference between not shooting a 5 year old kid and not getting your wife/girlfriend/mistress/neighbour preggers?

From what Bingo said, it is more like not shooting a five year old kid compared to not shooting his mother in the abdomen when she is only five weeks pregnant.

How much of a difference is that, really?

Mr T says :

It is never EASY to balance responsibility with ETHICS.

As a TIME LORD you enjoy certain privileges BUT with those opportunities COME great responsibility and ultimately only you can MAKE that decision.

I am sending you my leaflets GENOCIDE FOR THE GREATER GOOD and 20 WAYS TO LOOK IN THE MIRROR IN THE MORNING WHEN WHATEVER YOU DECIDE TO DO WILL ULTIMATELY RESULT IN THE END OF UNCOUNTABLE LIVES. 

BUT if whatever you decide to do results in putting FIREWORKS IN MY BINS and deliberating about BLOWING THEM UP you will travel in time the hard way, when I punch your face into the middle of NEXT WEEK.

CP3S said:

xhonzi said:

TheBoost said:

In the OP, would the Doctor actually be KILLING Daleks? Or preventing them from ever existing?

It seems to me the morallity of those two actions, while perhaps similar, aren't the same thing.

Sort of the difference between not shooting a 5 year old kid and not getting your wife/girlfriend/mistress/neighbour preggers?

From what Bingo said, it is more like not shooting a five year old kid compared to not shooting his mother in the abdomen when she is only five weeks pregnant.

How much of a difference is that, really?

Well, if you didn't do one thing or didn't do the other thing, you didn't do either so it's exactly the same.

I think.

....

Wait, is this thread about Tom Selleck?

TV's Frink said:

Wait, is this thread about Tom Selleck?

Top Gun Tom says :

I thought it was about killing aliens but if you want to post pictures of guys in and out of naval uniform I'm buying.

Able Seaman Ben Jackson says :

Ah, they look harmless.

Matt Of Gallifrey says :

Yeah right...and while we're at it Let's Kill Hitler...opps!

Sylvester Of Gallifrey says :

Oh I do love a Jam session...

Dr Fredrick Frunkenstein of Geneva interjects :

Dalek Cameron PM of Skaro asks:

Doctor Whom?

John of Gallifrey answers :

I could tell you but in the name of peace and sanity I'd have to shoot you afterwards.

Peter C of Gallifrey says :

I don't know. Kill a kid an hour until it sorts itself out?

Uncle Tom has no rights. If he wants favours, he'll have to kiss massa's flawless, porcelain ass.

FanFiltration said:

Moses said (that GOD said):

Thou shalt not kill!

 

Something off about this picture. Hmm.

*takes it to forensics lab and spends hours studying*

I believe it's the blood-colored sky. Yes.

The Exodus obviously took place on Mars. That's why no evidence of it having ever occurred can be found on Earth -- it didn't actually happen on Earth.

It also explains the pyramids on Mars; Martian Israelites built them.

Ezekiel was the ancient astronaut!

Does Tom have the right to blow up the BBC?