logo Sign In

Dark Knight Rises - Now that we know the cast — Page 26

Author
Time

greenpenguino said:

captainsolo said:

 

DKR did indeed change everything, and is without a doubt one of the best pieces of literature I have ever read. Take all of the hype you've heard about Watchmen and go read this instead. It is still an unbelievable read canonical or not. A film version with Kevin Conroy has long been a dream. (Though the new DCAU movie version-gulp-cast someone else)

Don't worry, Peter Weller is playing Batman. PETER ROBOCOP WELLER. squeee!!!

they are going to making yet another Batman movie? 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

captainsolo said:

DKR did indeed change everything, and is without a doubt one of the best pieces of literature I have ever read. Take all of the hype you've heard about Watchmen and go read this instead. It is still an unbelievable read canonical or not. A film version with Kevin Conroy has long been a dream. (Though the new DCAU movie version-gulp-cast someone else)

Have you heard about the animated film? They are making a two-part adapatation of it, slightly reminiscent of the style of the 1990s animated series. Looks pretty good. The trailer tries to play on the Dark Knight Rises similarities, for better or worse:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdtQVzJ3MEI

I'll definitely be seeing it though.

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

They make them all the time. DCAU are a series of animated strait to DVD/BD movies based onm different DC properties. DC releases a new one every couple of months or so. They've made a couple of Batman ones already. I watched Batman: Year One and thought it was a really good adaption (I did find myself wishing Kevin Conroy did the voice acting for Batman/Wayne. Bryan Cranston as Gordon was freaking amazing though). So I am pretty excited about TDKR (disappointed to see Cranston not returning to do Gordon again). A Batman aminated movie featuring Conroy, Hamill, and Cranston might just be about the best thing ever, but one can only dream.

Author
Time

zombie84 said:

captainsolo said:

DKR did indeed change everything, and is without a doubt one of the best pieces of literature I have ever read. Take all of the hype you've heard about Watchmen and go read this instead. It is still an unbelievable read canonical or not. A film version with Kevin Conroy has long been a dream. (Though the new DCAU movie version-gulp-cast someone else)

Have you heard about the animated film? They are making a two-part adapatation of it, slightly reminiscent of the style of the 1990s animated series. Looks pretty good. The trailer tries to play on the Dark Knight Rises similarities, for better or worse:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdtQVzJ3MEI

I'll definitely be seeing it though.

 

HOW DID I NOT KNOW ABOUT THIS!!???

Author
Time

This was rumored to be in the works a year or two ago and I wrote in asking for more information. (In some crazy hopes of landing some kind of job on the production though I have no drawing skills whatsoever.) It is set up to be a two-part adaptation with each part at about 80 minutes.

Though I applaud their efforts, the animation isn't very exciting to me, being computer generated and in a more Asian style. The storylines also seem to be compressed a bit too much to fit into the PG-13 80 minute timeframe.

And an animated DKR with no Kevin Conroy? Ugh the missed opportunity!

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time

I've been told the DCAU team was actually asked about the movie at a panel they did with Kevin Conroy. Must've been awkward when he shot them that look of "what?" haha.

Also, it's not computer-generated as much as inked. With animation these days, that's how it works. The animation itself is still hand-drawn, but the coloring/inking/finessing is done on computers. Except for with vehicles etc. (which often end up complete CG, and this is one of my ONLY complaints with the direction animation is headed in.)

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yeah, I was going to say, that animation is definitely hand drawn on Wacom tablets, except for the cars and probably any tracking shots of city streets. It's just easier to do that stuff in a computer with hand-drawn textures and then spend that money elsewhere (hopefully well spent). Hand animation is costly and animators who can properly draw moving vehicles and retreating buildings from any angle are even more costly. That shit is hard.

So, it's still 90% hand-drawn, with computer assistance.

Personally, I agree with the decision not to use Conroy, so as to present it as a standalone work. This is not the same Batman as appears in TAS and Batman Beyond. Besides, I like getting a chance to hear and see other actors in the role of Batman/Bruce Wayne. I love Kevin Conroy, but I don't agree with those who think he's the only man suitable to voice an animated Batman. Seems kind of fascist to me, lol.

As for a more "Asian style", I totally do not see it. At all. Looks like an edgier version of the Animated Series mixed with Miller's art for the novel.

Author
Time

zombie84 said:

CP3S said:

I think The Dark Knight Returns and the rest of Miller's Batman works serve much more as a defense for Warbler's side of this discussion than anything else. In other words, Miller got the character, why couldn't Nolan?

Going to have to disagree here. Dark Knight Returns opens with Batman already having given up being Batman. But he decides to come back for a final fight, with the understanding that it will probably kill him. Like in Dark Knight Rises, his health problems and the realization that this battle may be his last are hinted at throughout.

I have no qualms about him having already retired and coming back. In The Dark Knight Returns, he calls it quits after Robin dies a brutal death and comes back he sees Gotham needs him. In The Dark Knight Rises he retired after taking the fall for Dent and ruining his reputation. It makes sense in that context to retire, Batman is now a symbol of the wrongs in Gotham and thanks to Dent, Gotham crime levels have reached a point manageable by the police force. I think both of those scenarios are believable enough (Nolan's perhaps more than Miller's even), but in both those situations he retains his identity, his resources, and everything needed to jump back into the game.

In The Dark Knight Returns Bruce fakes his death to get a government that wants him dead off his back. Millions of dollars of Bruce Wayne's money mysteriously disappears and the mansion burns to the ground. In Miller's story, there is a purpose for his death, he doesn't die to retire or quit, he dies and a means to continue fighting. In Nolan's story, it really feels like the main reason it is there is simply because Nolan was making a salad out of elements from his favorite Batman stories. He fakes his death when the was no real logical reason for it to be necessary.

He could live and still go to France. Or anywhere else he wanted. There was simply no real reason to let the world think he was dead.

 

Finally at the end, Batman does give up being Batman. The suit is retired, and he instead decides to spend his days training new recruits to do the work he once was able to do so effectively, passing on the torch as it were.

That simply isn't true. The suit is never retired. He is wearing the bat suit, fighting Clark, he "dies", then the very next scene with him it is revealed he is alive and training his recruits. Never any talk about not being Batman. When he says, "She is perfect" in regards to Carrie, he isn't talking about a replacement, it is in response to Alfred questioning him for accepting another sidekick after what had happened to the last Robin and how hard on him it had been.

Ever time I've read The Dark Knight Returns, I've gotten the impression of Batman being an old man who is determined to wear the cowl until his heart stops beating, not someone looking for a replacement so he can chillax

 

 (Dark Knight Rises is way more realistic: Bruce's body would be spent for good before he was forty)

Like the part where he gets his back broken and is fist fighting Bane mere months later?

Author
Time

It's cool that they got Peter Weller but I'm wary. I didn't care for their adaption of Year One. It felt like they rubbed the edges off and left it dulled.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Bingo and Gaffer,  I totally missed your bee posts.  Nicely done on both. 

[off-topic]
Speaking of which, I have a feral colony in my yard that I'll be removing later this year.  Pics when I do.  Gigantic.  It'll be an all-day task. 
[/off-topic]

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

With God as my witness;  Early this morning, while I was out in the front yard, a group of about five crows landed in my neighbor's tree.  They made quite a ruckus for a few minutes and then flew away.  They aren't common this deep into the city.  I see them maybe once a year.  I should have taken it as a sign.  ;-)

(Mild spoilers)

Got back from The Dark Knight Rises about an hour ago.  I was pleasantly surprised.  In fact, very pleasantly surprised.  All my concerns of bloated story, too many main characters, scene chewing, etc were all for nothing.  Bane as a character and as an on-screen presence was pulled back, as was Selina Kyle. They're handled very well, particularly Selina.  They add to the story, as opposed to smothering it the way the Joker did in Dark Knight

Selina's character and story were interesting and nicely done.  I found her engaging - and not just for her incredible physical beauty.  *swoon*  Her character was someone I wanted to know more about and see more of.  Great stuff all the way around from Selina\Hathaway. The film left me wanting more of her, which I think is a sign of a great portrayal.

It's largely a Bruce Wayne story and I was fine with that.  The action was fine, but I enjoyed the cerebral portions more.  Some of the darkness was back, which was also a welcome change.

Really dug the tie-back to Batman Begins.  It felt like part of the first film much more so than DK did.  Joseph Gordon-Levitt was outstanding.  I loved the nod that he was Robin the whole time, without actually being the traditional Robin. He was Bruce's partner, without a costume.  Fucking genius.

I also loved the ending.  Great on all counts.  They leave it all up to your imagination and I thank them for that.  I also dug how Selina is with Bruce, but nothing is made of it.  Truthfully, if you're not paying close attention, you could miss her.  I also loved how she was completely unaware of anything at the restaurant.  Again - superbly handled.

Gentleman, and ladies of the board - I was wrong.  And I'm quite happy about it.  I'll see it again and I'll have the DVD as soon as it's available. 

 

 

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Glad you enjoyed it. I felt TDKR was the best of the three. Tied everything together, delivered an emotional story, and provided plenty of spectacle to behold. A great, great movie.

“Grow up. These are my Disney's movies, not yours.”

Author
Time

I always look at Anchorhead's opinions as near gospel truth.  Thanks for the review, and for stating so elegantly what I feel :)

Author
Time

Anchorhead said:

Joseph Gordon-Levitt was outstanding.  I loved the nod that he was Robin the whole time, without actually being the traditional Robin. He was Bruce's partner, without a costume.  Fucking genius.

YES! Someone gets it!

Anyways it's always nice to see someone who was able to enjoy this fantastic work.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

A word about the score.  I've been a film score nerd for as long as I can remember.  First LP I ever bought was a movie score and they've been a huge part of my life ever since. They probably make up 50% of my music library and I listen to film scores more than anything else.  By far. 

Needless to say, I have both Nolan-Batman scores, and listen to them a lot.  Even though I don't care too much for Dark Knight the film, the score is fantastic. The Dark Knight Rises kicked it up a notch. 

The first two scores are somewhat similar and I expected more of the same this time.  However, this new one really gets deeper and more layered.  Zimmer brought his A game. I particularly dig the quieter Selina pieces. Without a doubt, Mind If I Cut In? is my favorite.  The simple piano cords are haunting and intoxicating.  The heaviness of Underground Army is also fantastic.

Along those lines, I downloaded this app;

http://entertainment.time.com/2012/07/24/dark-knight-rises-app-is-a-musical-tour-of-gotham-city/

I did it to get the extra hour of music not on the soundtrack and some of which isn't in the film.  The Origins Suites were written early on and not included in their entirety.  The functionality of the app is also very interesting.

 

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Yeah the score for this one is quite remarkable. The one's you mentioned are definitely some of the best, but my favorite one is "Gotham's Reckoning," which is partly because I love the scene it's from. Same goes for "Why Do We Fall?" another one of my favorites. 

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

Anchorhead said:

Joseph Gordon-Levitt was outstanding.  I loved the nod that he was Robin the whole time, without actually being the traditional Robin. He was Bruce's partner, without a costume.  Fucking genius.

YES! Someone gets it!

                                      

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

captainsolo said:

This was rumored to be in the works a year or two ago and I wrote in asking for more information. (In some crazy hopes of landing some kind of job on the production though I have no drawing skills whatsoever.) It is set up to be a two-part adaptation with each part at about 80 minutes.

Though I applaud their efforts, the animation isn't very exciting to me, being computer generated and in a more Asian style. The storylines also seem to be compressed a bit too much to fit into the PG-13 80 minute timeframe.

And an animated DKR with no Kevin Conroy? Ugh the missed opportunity!

Conroy sounds exactly as i would imagine batman would sound.  Robocop as Batman=fail.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time

Now that it has settled in, I’m leaning toward saying Rises is the best of the three.  Begins and Rises are both great stories, but I don't think the acting in Begins is on par with Rises.  Not bad by any stretch, but Holmes brings it down a notch, as does Hauer. 

In Rises, the depth of the character of Selina, as well as Anne Hathaway’s expert handling of her, push the film to the next level.  Joseph Gordon-Levitt puts the thing out of reach.  Everyone else is their usual fantastic.  Bane is fine but there isn’t really a lot of depth there.  He’s more of an archetypal bad guy character, as opposed to depth.  He works perfectly as a symbol of danger, but it’s mostly a visual performance.  I dug the Sean Connery vibe in his voice. He worked perfectly for this story.  He was a welcome pull-back from the Joker in the previous film.  Limiting Bane gave the story and the other characters room to breathe.

As I think about the film now, my mind’s eye sees it as a Selina\Blake story.  Those two performances and characters left the deepest impression.  In the clip linked below, when Selina says “I’m not sure”, you see that she really is the person Batman tells her she is when he puts his trust in her later on.  Outstanding.  To me, just in this clip alone, Levitt and Hathaway become the film for me.


 http://www.moviefanatic.com/videos/the-dark-knight-rises-interrogation-clip/

Second viewing this weekend.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)

I saw it while I was away and I have to say I found it remarkably unremarkable.

Considering the plot points and the talent involved there was no sense of tension. 

The Amazing Spider-Man was a much more interesting film.

Anyone could have been Bane in that mask Hardy might as well have not bothered with that stupid voice.

Dark Knight Rises is the weakest of the bunch, the ROTJ of it's trilogy.

Author
Time

The Reason Christopher Nolan Films Look Like Christopher Nolan Films

 

With the The Dark Knight Rises' director's longtime cinematographer Wally Pfister stepping down, his movies' distinctive visual style could change.

 

http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/07/the-reason-christopher-nolan-films-look-like-christopher-nolan-films/260087/

 

A very good article...

“First feel fear, then get angry. Then go with your life into the fight.” - Bill Mollison

Author
Time

I would hate to be the Director who is tasked with rebooting Batman once again and being compared to Nolan's films.

Maybe they will actually focus  more on Batman as a detective.  The 90's animated did that right, Arkham games did.

As he was featured in detective comics.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.