logo Sign In

Complete Comparison of Special Edition Visual Changes — Page 16

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

First Transport is Away doesnt have CGI anything. There aren't CGI ships outside of ANH (minus the Vader shuttle). I'll have to go over it again.

These SE X-wings definitely look CG to my eyes, this is the only sequence it could be. There are also other places in the trilogy when they used CG-models for the SE.

This one in your Jedi comparisons is not an actual change/retiming of the scene, just another case of the splitscreen-DVD not being synced up exactly, probably due to different frame counts between the transfers.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Yeah, that's the shot I was thinking they might be referring to. My issue is that the 06 comparison specifically mentions it being a simple recomp. Makes me wonder how the comparisons were made. It seems like the 97 list, due to it's technicality and vagueness, was made by an ILMer trying to remember what they had done, while the 06 was one of the website editors with a splitscreen asked to point out everything he could see over a few days.

Second one is probably a mis-sync, I'll verify why I put it in there.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Hi, folks! Yup, it's Treadwell, creator of that 14-year-old (yikes!) SE changes site. Although I never put it back up after dumping my ISP a few years ago, it's good to know it's still of some use, even in archive.org form.

Peter Lopez recommended originaltrilogy to me recently, but I did already know about it, and used to read it regularly. Somehow I lost the habit.

Anyway, I've just spent hours reading this thread (slow work day) and see y'all have far surpassed my seminal efforts. Great stuff. As such, I only have a few things to offer.

I made some quick notes as I went, so here they are. Some points might be redundant to other posts:

ANH:

1. There was some discussion of missing or extra frames here and there, namely fading out/in to Threepio in the oilbath, or the TIEs approaching the Death Star in comp 60. These are reel change points--as such, it is common for one transfer to have a few frames more or less than another, as they have to be either put together later in the video realm, or the reels edited together in real time during the telecine. While these would count as differences, they are the kind of thing that will be found between every transfer ever made (not just original/SE), and thus do not fall within doubleofive's listing criteria.

2. Someone pointed out color inconsistencies inside the Sandcrawler. There might very well be, but using the lights on Artoo as reference is problematic, as they were fiber optics that led to a color wheel--so the colors would change as the wheel turned.

3.

 

I find this interesting, for if this is a recomp, they seem to have used the original clash animation mattes--or very carefully matched them (which they didn't do for the ESB cave recomp). However, look at how the light shining on the ceiling strut (which is present in frames without the flash) was mistaken for "flash" and filled in with the effect for the second pic. That shows that the clashes were, at least, altered by hand.

4. The Treadwell site said:

Right after Gold Leader says "Red Leader this is Gold Leader", the Y-Wings outside his window still disappear for a single frame at the end of the shot.

This was still the case in '97 but not 2004. I've never checked to see if they just removed the last frame of the shot or restored the Y's.

 

 

5. Comp 260: John D. is name of the pilot of Red 4 (or Blue 4) in the script (and the credits). It has nothing to do with John Dykstra. John D. was played by Jack Klaff.

6. The Treadwell site said:

the first two frames of the shot where Vader opens fire on Luke are missing the TIE on the left-hand side!

This was still the case in '97 but not 2004. I think this shot is a recomp, as are a few more not listed, such as the torpedoes entering the shaft.

 

 

7. On DVNR and hologram scan lines: it's been pointed out, but I must support the notion that the GOUT/'93 laserdisc sources cannot be trusted when evaluating such fine detail. The DVNR was applied during telecine, so the GOUT isn't going to be any better than other '93 fan copies in that regard. There was some mention of GOUT actually being softer...would comparisons to fanmade '93 LD transfers help in this case? Is the EditDroid version still about the best, or have better ones come along?


ESB:

1. The probes launching is a recomp. The pods are slightly rearranged/timed.

2. Comp 45: replacement bg? You mean the one behind Piett? Or do you mean the framework around the monitor? In either case, I'm not so sure. Yes, we can see more of the wall behind Piett, but I don't think that's a CG extension, just a slight realignment of the element.

3. The slomo cave scene would definitely be recomped, as it was not shot in slow motion, but was slowed down in post via "stretch printing", which repeats frames. That's why the original version has so much printed-in dirt. Since they were redoing opticals, it would make sense to throw this in as well, thus necessitating recomping the sabers and the clashes. Now, why the original saber and clash overlay elements weren't used, who knows.


4. Speaking of redone opticals, what about the quick fades between Luke and Vader just before the escape to hyperspace? They're only like 4 frames, so it would be hard us to compare, but these were probably redone along with all the others.


5. The Treadwell site says:

I have NO confirmation, but I've always believed one or two shots of Vader looking out the window have BLACK AND WHITE elements; notice how monochromatic he is, even the reflections on his helmet. My SUSPICION has been that his helmet suffered from "blue spill" and thus couldn't be chroma-keyed with a color Vader element. Still looks this way to me in the SE video, but it could all be in my head.

Back in the day, someone emailed me to say they studied it in photoshop or something, and, aside from video noise, they could find no chroma information on Vader. I think it might have been fixed for 2004.

ROTJ
1. The Treadwell site says:

For some reason, this shot of Artoo turning his head to look at us (the shot is a POV of the camera-arm-thing that pops out of the door to Jabba's Palace) is shorter in the SE. The two versions go immediately out of synch with that shot. Weird.

I haven't checked the 2004. This is not a reel change point, as that just happened between the matte painting shot of the droids and the studio shot of them approaching the doors. I think the SE did something (or RE-did something) to Artoo's eye to hide light shining through it, and I guess their source element turned out to be shorter.

 

 

All I got for now. Keep up the good work!

 

-Jay

Author
Time

Treadwell said:

2. Someone pointed out color inconsistencies inside the Sandcrawler. There might very well be, but using the lights on Artoo as reference is problematic, as they were fiber optics that led to a color wheel--so the colors would change as the wheel turned.

That was just a way of me to demonstrate how F***ED up the '04 transfer is. In this case my example isn't problematic as Artoo's light was always green in that shot as well as every other shot of it. My point was to show how many errors there really are in these transfers down to the smallest details, this is just not a matter of a new colortiming done to the films, these are fatal technical errors in the transfers that not making any sense, some may not notice them but there is hundreds of these instances throughout these DVD's, it's just that when it happens when a lighsaber is on screen, everyone notice it, that's why I don't think those kind of differences should be listed.

To me the 2004 DVD's just looks like a little child sat and played with all the settings, in one shot the saturation is bumped up to the max in the next it is totally desaturated, in one scene the black levels are crushed, a few moments later it has clipped white levels, this all happens within scenes that were shot at the same time with the same lightning conditions and were supposed to look identical, they're just apart because of editing, (C-3PO in the garage, for example).

The same thing happens in the lightsaber battle, when Vader's correct green lights in his belt goes from green to blue and back again from shot to shot, but most people will just recognise that Vader has a pink saber in one shot and Ben a purple in another, the problem with the colors are more extensive than that and often related.

GOUT

2004 DVD

GOUT

2004 DVD

 GOUT

2004 DVD

How do you even accomplish something like this?! Try to fix these flaws with color correction... you simply can't, these are fundamental technical glitches that are everywhere in these transfers, not artistic changes...I hope.

Treadwell said: 

7. On DVNR and hologram scan lines: it's been pointed out, but I must support the notion that the GOUT/'93 laserdisc sources cannot be trusted when evaluating such fine detail. The DVNR was applied during telecine, so the GOUT isn't going to be any better than other '93 fan copies in that regard. There was some mention of GOUT actually being softer...would comparisons to fanmade '93 LD transfers help in this case? Is the EditDroid version still about the best, or have better ones come along?

The GOUT can be trusted where the scanlines are noticable, all holograms had scanlines in them in the original trilogy, it was just that they didn't include them for some recomposites that were made in '97.

The scanlines in the Emperor hologram for example, are in the '93 telecine, but are barely noticable on the GOUT due to vertical blur or something, you can see them on several fanmade '93 LD transfers, I posted a few examples earlier in the thread.

 

Thanks for joining the thread, Treadwell. Nice observations!

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Awesome to have someone who shares our pain around here! Awesome to have you around, I'll try to get to all of your points soon.

So crazy at first I thought the SE was just a handful of new shots and some tweaked effects. Then i thought the DVD was the SE with two or three changes a movie. Now we see that it's almost like they started over for the DVD... Crazy!

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Treadwell said:

There was some discussion of missing or extra frames here and there, namely fading out/in to Threepio in the oilbath, or the TIEs approaching the Death Star in comp 60. These are reel change points--as such, it is common for one transfer to have a few frames more or less than another, as they have to be either put together later in the video realm, or the reels edited together in real time during the telecine. While these would count as differences, they are the kind of thing that will be found between every transfer ever made (not just original/SE), and thus do not fall within doubleofive's listing criteria.

 

I agree with you, the fade out/in to Threepio in the oilbath is a reel change point, but I don't know if that one was missing any frames between transfers, they just remade the fade, right? And I don't think the other one, comp. 60, is a reel change point though, IIRC the next reel change is after Tarkin says "We will then crush the rebellion with one swift stroke", I could be wrong though.

Edit: I checked, the scene is actually a 1997-recomp:

last frame of GOUT

last frame of 2004 DVD

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Treadwell said:

1. There was some discussion of missing or extra frames here and there, namely fading out/in to Threepio in the oilbath, or the TIEs approaching the Death Star in comp 60. These are reel change points--as such, it is common for one transfer to have a few frames more or less than another, as they have to be either put together later in the video realm, or the reels edited together in real time during the telecine.

Welcome aboard, Treadwell

I've done a bit of research myself on reel changeover points, so my ears perked up when I read that part of your message.
Shirley the oilbath is the start of a reel. We have glaring evidence in the form of a motor cue dot after Threepio's line "...beyond my capacity" in one of the telecine bootlegs.
However, I'll join with msycamore in questioning your assertion that 60 is a changeover point. It doesn't match my findings.

Treadwell said:

they are the kind of thing that will be found between every transfer ever made (not just original/SE),
That's the method I've used in my research -- I compared every transfer ever made ;) ;) ;)
No but I compared several laserdiscs, and noted the differences.
Somewhere around here I've compiled my findings into a thread called 'reel lengths' or something like that. As I said in there, corrections are certainly welcome. If you can set me straight, I'm all ears. Treadwell, can you offer any clues why you believe 60 is a reel change?

However, in practice you must take into account the “fuckwit factor”. Just talk to Darth Mallwalker…
-Moth3r

Author
Time

Darth Mallwalker said:

 


However, I'll join with msycamore in questioning your assertion that 60 is a changeover point. It doesn't match my findings.

 

I'll defer to you guys on that one. Maybe there was a splice at that point in a print I saw repeatedly that stuck in my head.

Author
Time

Darth Mallwalker wrote:

I've compiled my findings into a thread called 'reel lengths'

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Reel-lengths/topic/11666/

 

Treadwell wrote:

Lopez recommended originaltrilogy to me recently

Well that's not going to mean anything round these part, user names and all.  "Hey, it's me!"  Thanks for posting. 

The clash animation mattes detail you pointed out makes me wonder if when they did the work were people assigned shots or parts of shots.  Was someone responsible for all lightsaber comps, someone else all laser blasts, someone else spaceships etc.  What you point out really sounds like an assembly line mistake, where they don't look at the whole scene just the photoshop selection.  and apply the filter and move onto the next shot.  Wish the guy from the blu-ray thread who was part of the color job would write a little more...

Author
Time

Those redone saber clash mattes in the Falcon I earlier posted, was done for the '97 SE,  where as the flashes in the duel and Empire was remade for the 2004 DVD... those effects were originally quite different, also I guess there was a quite different approach to the two projects as a whole, the 1997 SE restoration and enhancement feels more like a professionally made work than the 2004 DVD production, even how bad some of those alterations in '97 were.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Case said:

Just chiming in to say hello (longtime lurker here),and that the amount of time and effort you all have put into the comparisons? Brilliant and I thank you. Until I began reading this thread,I wasn't aware that the trilogy had been altered on such a massive scale.

 

Case!  (or is it Casé? ;) ) Welcome to the boards!  Feel free to post more often, bra.

Author
Time

It's Case. And thank you.

 

 

I visit this thread on a regular basis. I've dug up my old SE VHS,my Faces VHS and have been comparing them to my DVDs.  Every change that's been pointed out here? I can't see anything else now.  I have nothing against the changes,I would love some consistency though. How VFX and restoration professionals could put out a product like the '04 DVDs is beyond me.

 

 


Author
Time

Treadwell said:

Hi, folks! Yup, it's Treadwell, creator of that 14-year-old (yikes!) SE changes site. Although I never put it back up after dumping my ISP a few years ago, it's good to know it's still of some use, even in archive.org form.

Peter Lopez recommended originaltrilogy to me recently, but I did already know about it, and used to read it regularly. Somehow I lost the habit....

[cool stuff omitted]

-Jay

The Treadwell lives!  

Man, I loved that site.  I used to read it all the time.  That and SKot's Holiday Special Site.  

Now I'm all nostalgic.  I need to sit down for awhile.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I haven't got a handy rip of Jedi to hand right now, but am I the only one who's ever noticed that when the Skiff Lando's hanging from gets shot and tips forward, it also twists since the SE?

Edit: best I can do for proof at the moment:

http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/7258/skiff.jpg

DE

Author
Time

Not noticed it either, although I have rarely watched the SE versions and my 2006 DVD disc for it is not working at the moment for some reason.

Here is the sequence from the original ROTJ:

Can someone do one from the SE to compare? Cheers.

Author
Time

Wow.

http://lh4.ggpht.com/_1WBvrwBY-EI/TTrSwIlByRI/AAAAAAAAHns/LynZQ8c8l5M/s640/skifftip.jpg

There you go. Checked both 97 and 04, it tilts backwards in the SE before it tips straight over sideways.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Damn, and you tell me now, when I rotoscoped the new sarlacc out of that shot and already released my reconstruction? ;-D

I'm apparently not a very keen observer, because I did that, which means that at some point I had both versions layered over each other in AE with 50% opacity and yet I never noticed...

Author
Time

Harmy said:


Damn, and you tell me now, when I rotoscoped the new sarlacc out of that shot and already released my reconstruction? ;-D

I'm apparently not a very keen observer, because I did that, which means that at some point I had both versions layered over each other in AE with 50% opacity and yet I never noticed...
There's no new Sarlacc in that shot, that's why I never noticed. I was so concerned looking for one of those new tentacles that I missed the digital flipping that was inches from where I was looking!

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Harmy said:


Man, it even is in your comparisons:

Or did you add it so quickly?
It was already there. [shamed]

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

:-D

Your argument still stands though, like me, you were so distracted by the goddamn testacles, urm, I mean tentacles, that you didn't notice the skiff. Like I said, I had the two shots layered over each other and didn't notice...