Bring Back Ric! — Page 6

Warbler said:

TV's Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV's Frink said:

Possessed said:

But then other socks would have to be allowed too

Says who?

 Well if Ric were allowed back, it is inevitable that some would eventually create a sock(some troll/idiot is bound to try it sometime) and then that sock would get banned and then they would complain that "you let Frink have a sock account, how come I can't have one?". 

 So what?

 So maybe the mods don't want to deal with the problem of being accused of giving special treatment to someone.

 I can't imagine that's something that would bother them.

Possessed said:

Pretty sure he's being silly, Warb.

 Wrong.

TV's Frink said:

Possessed said:

Pretty sure he's being silly, Warb.

 Wrong.

 Fuck yo couch.

Bump for recent relevance.

That's a modern hip-hop group name if I've ever heard one.

PS: I haven't.

Ric needs to stay dead Frink.  You've already got far more rope than most on this forum including some mods I think.

No need to be greedy.

:) 

Yeah but you gotta pay the troll toll to get into the... never mind.

Jetrell Fo said:

Ric needs to stay dead Frink.  You've already got far more rope than most on this forum including some mods I think.

 I'd love to hear more about this theory.

Post Praetorian said:

I disagree, though perhaps it is because I remain only in the off-topic area, seemingly the more activity this site elicits from its members the more excuse for participation. Particularly since this sock is an open secret it poses little likelihood of causing any real difficulty. It is simply a prop, not a tool for a troll...

At the time, Ric's handler was a secret.  After the fact shouldn't give preferrential treatment on the forum. 

Jetrell Fo said:

Post Praetorian said:

I disagree, though perhaps it is because I remain only in the off-topic area, seemingly the more activity this site elicits from its members the more excuse for participation. Particularly since this sock is an open secret it poses little likelihood of causing any real difficulty. It is simply a prop, not a tool for a troll...

At the time, Ric's handler was a secret.

 Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-Ric-Olie-Observation-Thread/post/377439/#TopicPost377439

TV's Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Post Praetorian said:

I disagree, though perhaps it is because I remain only in the off-topic area, seemingly the more activity this site elicits from its members the more excuse for participation. Particularly since this sock is an open secret it poses little likelihood of causing any real difficulty. It is simply a prop, not a tool for a troll...

At the time, Ric's handler was a secret.

 Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-Ric-Olie-Observation-Thread/post/377439/#TopicPost377439

Lay off would you. 

I'm not trying to start anything up again.  We've been socially peaceful and I want to keep it that way.

"I" did not know it was you and I'm sure most outside of off topic didn't know either.  Is that more to the point for you.

I knew.  Somehow, I'd always known.

Jetrell Fo said:

TV's Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Post Praetorian said:

I disagree, though perhaps it is because I remain only in the off-topic area, seemingly the more activity this site elicits from its members the more excuse for participation. Particularly since this sock is an open secret it poses little likelihood of causing any real difficulty. It is simply a prop, not a tool for a troll...

At the time, Ric's handler was a secret.

 Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-Ric-Olie-Observation-Thread/post/377439/#TopicPost377439

Lay off would you. 

I'm not trying to start anything up again.  We've been socially peaceful and I want to keep it that way.

;-)

Possessed said:

I knew.  Somehow, I'd always known.

 Lol.