- Time
- Post link
~* you know you love me... xoxo *~
Boy Toy Application — Page 7
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
OR better yet
call a friend up and practice on them.
if you stumble and mix up your words don't worry, we do it too.
~* you know you love me... xoxo *~
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: Adamwankenobi
That statement I can agree with.
Originally posted by: Nanner Split
Age shouldn't really be a factor.
Age shouldn't really be a factor.
That statement I can agree with.
Perhaps I should've been more specific. Age shouldn't be a factor as long as the age difference is within reason. For instance, both parties should be past puberty
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: Nanner Split
Well, I'm not exactly gonna run off with some twelve year old.
Well, I'm not exactly gonna run off with some twelve year old.
Then you're saying that you believe that age does matter then.
I'm sure you wouldn't have said that in ancient/biblical times.
I mean, you would have 30 year old men dating 13 year olds. And even Mary, the mother of Christ, was supposedly 13 or so when she dated Joseph. - Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Helen of Sparta (who later became Helen of Troy) was kidnapped at the age of 10 by Theseus, King of Athens and he raped her. He was 50.
~* you know you love me... xoxo *~
- Time
- Post link
Take your age, divide by two, and add seven. If the object of your affection is younger than that, then he or she is too young.
As an example, we'll take my age, 23. Divide by two, and you get 12 (I round up). Add seven, and you end up with a final of 19. I'm 23, and I shouldn't date younger than 19. Well, in this case, 18 and a half would be fine, but I'd consider a girl who just turned 18 to be a little young for me.
This equation works well, in my opinion. At younger ages, it stops you from dating too young (eg, if you're 17, you shouldn't date younger than 15 and a half), while at older ages, it allows greater range (a 40 year old could date as young as 27). I think it keeps things in reasonable range. Also, it means that you shouldn't be dating if you're younger than 14.
Math is good like that.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: sybeman
I believe in the "One half plus seven" rule, because math never lies.
Take your age, divide by two, and add seven. If the object of your affection is younger than that, then he or she is too young.
As an example, we'll take my age, 23. Divide by two, and you get 12 (I round up). Add seven, and you end up with a final of 19. I'm 23, and I shouldn't date younger than 19. Well, in this case, 18 and a half would be fine, but I'd consider a girl who just turned 18 to be a little young for me.
This equation works well, in my opinion. At younger ages, it stops you from dating too young (eg, if you're 17, you shouldn't date younger than 15 and a half), while at older ages, it allows greater range (a 40 year old could date as young as 27). I think it keeps things in reasonable range. Also, it means that you shouldn't be dating if you're younger than 14.
Math is good like that.
I believe in the "One half plus seven" rule, because math never lies.
Take your age, divide by two, and add seven. If the object of your affection is younger than that, then he or she is too young.
As an example, we'll take my age, 23. Divide by two, and you get 12 (I round up). Add seven, and you end up with a final of 19. I'm 23, and I shouldn't date younger than 19. Well, in this case, 18 and a half would be fine, but I'd consider a girl who just turned 18 to be a little young for me.
This equation works well, in my opinion. At younger ages, it stops you from dating too young (eg, if you're 17, you shouldn't date younger than 15 and a half), while at older ages, it allows greater range (a 40 year old could date as young as 27). I think it keeps things in reasonable range. Also, it means that you shouldn't be dating if you're younger than 14.
Math is good like that.
wow thats actually a great formula, i am going to use it.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: sean wookie
I use the two years younger rule.
I use the two years younger rule.
I agree with you, Sean, at the younger ages, but as you move on, then it's not as big an issue. I mean, if two people were seeing each other and were 37 and 32, you wouldn't say anything about it, but you probably would if they were each 17 years younger (making them 20 and 15, for anyone who doesn't care to do the math). I think the age closeness can relax as we get older.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
for me, being 21, i wouldn't date someone younger than 20. but in terms of how old, i'd say maybe my cut off limit for actually dating a guy is 30. however i have been know to fall for guys around 30-35 (back when i was 18 and 19). so yeah that's my story/view.
~* you know you love me... xoxo *~
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link