- Time
- Post link
You spelled "prequel" wrong at least 5 times.
You spelled "prequel" wrong at least 5 times.
At least he's consistent.
You gotta point there.
I kinda feel like I've derailed this thread with all this talk about the merits of Prequels so think I should direct everyone who wishes to continue the discussion over here:
As for Blade Runner, it's a film with a very specific style that I don't believe can be replicated by a modern day Sequel or Prequel. However, this move has very little to do with the artistic merit of extending the franchise and a lot to do with the business side of ensuring the rights to Blade Runner don't expire. This is why the news has been greeted negatively by the vast majority of fans.
Your brain just makes s**t up!
A fate worse than death? Having your head digitally replaced with that of Hayden Christensen!
I was thinking about this.
IF "Blade Runner" needs to be franchised, I'd like to see 4-6 ambitious directors given a shot to make an anthology film. Each short film could be a different nook of the amazing "Blade Runner" Los Angeles.
Just thoughts that might be neat to see.
That could work pretty well actually. If they did that it could be interesting
<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>
Ziggy Stardust said:
You spelled "prequel" wrong at least 5 times.
That's theBoost's calling card.
I've been trying to rehabilitate him for years, but... I'm done trying to change TheBoost. Now I just let him move right through me on his way to you.
IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!
"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005
"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM
"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.