logo Sign In

Blade Runner OV vs. DC — Page 2

Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Windexed
The part about the finished 3-disc super edition is 100% heresay.


Supposedly, that release will include: The OV, the 1992 DCD, and Ridley Scott's "ultimate" DC.
Author
Time
Post link
Supposedly shmosedly. There's not the tiniest bit of proof that it exists, other than some dude somewhere on the internet saying "Supposedly Ridley did this awesome 3-disc set with 3 different versions of the film with full comentary and on-set interviews!".

And Nanner, I thought the same thing while I was typing it out.
40,000 million notches away
Author
Time
Post link
Well, I got my info from BRmovie.com, which is the TF.N of Blade Runner.
Author
Time
Post link
I take it Adam prefers a super special edition of Blade Runner than the original.
"Yub Knub" by Warrick Davis
Author
Time
Post link
I can tell you that certain parts of the 3-disc release were completed, but the project is in limbo thanks to Jerry Perenchio. How do I know this? I heard it from the DVD's producer, Charles de Lauzirika.

Princess Leia: I happen to like nice men.
Han Solo: I'm a nice man.

Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: kev
I take it Adam prefers a super special edition of Blade Runner than the original.


Yes. Yes kev, I do. The original was NOT what the director wanted. And in this situation, Ridley Scott is NOT Lucas. In this case, the studio took the film from Scott and edited it the way THEY wanted, rather than how he, the artist wanted it. They tried to dumb down the movie by giving it a happy ending, and remove scenes that make the audience think. They removed a scene that hinted that Deckard may be a replicant (aka "The Unicorn Scene"). kev, prefering the directors cut is NOT blasphemy. In my opinion, it's the other way around.
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Adamwankenobi
kev, prefering the directors cut is NOT blasphemy. In fact, it's the other way around.


I wouldn't have as big a problem with this statement if you didn't say "In fact." If someone prefers the directors cut, great. If someone prefers the theatrical cut, great. Don't tell me what is blasphemy. If it's your opinion that it's blasphemy, fine. Say so. But don't call it fact. That's blasphemy.
Author
Time
Post link
Adam.....could you please go away? As in, leave this BBS....no one likes you here.
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: sybeman
Originally posted by: Adamwankenobi
kev, prefering the directors cut is NOT blasphemy. In fact, it's the other way around.

I wouldn't have as big a problem with this statement if you didn't say "In fact." If someone prefers the directors cut, great. If someone prefers the theatrical cut, great. Don't tell me what is blasphemy. If it's your opinion that it's blasphemy, fine. Say so. But don't call it fact. That's blasphemy.


I changed my post to read "in my opinion" instead. Sorry.

Originally posted by: Cable-X1
Adam.....could you please go away? As in, leave this BBS....no one likes you here.


No.
Author
Time
Post link
Changing one instance isn't going to change it all, Adam. Opinions are like assholes -- everyone has one, and most of them stink. I don't mind your opinion, but your use of "in fact," "actually," and other be-all-end-all statements grate my nerves. Don't ever, ever, tell me your assh....opinion is any better than anyone else's.
Author
Time
Post link
OK, I won't. I apologize for stating my opinion as a fact. I changed my original post when you brought that to my attention.
Author
Time
Post link
Thank you. Though I prefer the OV of your post to the new Director's Cut!
Author
Time
Post link
Originally posted by: Adamwankenobi
Originally posted by: kev
I take it Adam prefers a super special edition of Blade Runner than the original.


Yes. Yes kev, I do. The original was NOT what the director wanted. And in this situation, Ridley Scott is NOT Lucas. In this case, the studio took the film from Scott and edited it the way THEY wanted, rather than how he, the artist wanted it. They tried to dumb down the movie by giving it a happy ending, and remove scenes that make the audience think. They removed a scene that hinted that Deckard may be a replicant (aka "The Unicorn Scene"). kev, prefering the directors cut is NOT blasphemy. In my opinion, it's the other way around.



you obviously don't take the hint do you? I was being sarcastic. You Adam are a sad attention seeker, you have to thrive on a response. Pathetic twat.
"Yub Knub" by Warrick Davis
Author
Time
Post link
No, I didn't sense the sarcasm. Since it was coming from you, I automatically assumed you were being a prick as usual.