logo Sign In

BEAUTIFUL WOMEN NEW RULES IN FIRST POST (NSFW) UPDATED RULES — Page 142

Author
Time

Lisa Marie Varon... aka "Tara" in TNA Wrestling.

A hot lady who could kick my ass is a real selling point.

Author
Time

CP3S said:

Ziz said:

You guys are amateurs at this.  Two words...

 

Denise Milani

 

Whoa, a bit too top heavy there for my taste! I am a big fan of proportionate women; not to mention I don't care too much for things that are not original...

I was going to post some YouTube videos of her in motion that prove that she's not fake judging by the way she moves and the way certain types of clothing hang on her but obviously you're not willing to be proven wrong in the interest of actually learning something.

My outlook on life - we’re all on the Hindenburg anyway…no point fighting over the window seat.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

CP3S said:

Ziz said:

You guys are amateurs at this.  Two words...

 

Denise Milani

 

Whoa, a bit too top heavy there for my taste! I am a big fan of proportionate women; not to mention I don't care too much for things that are not original...

This.  Even if they are real.

Author
Time

I agree with the above. Mainly the proportionate part; ginormous... assets... are attractive on people of a larger build. But she's too skinny for those.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

Ziz said:

I was going to post some YouTube videos of her in motion that prove that she's not fake judging by the way she moves and the way certain types of clothing hang on her but obviously you're not willing to be proven wrong in the interest of actually learning something.

Easy there, killer! What's with the over reaction? I am always willing to be proven wrong and to learn something. Are you? You seem to be getting overly defensive about my accusation of her fake breasts being fake.

 

I could be totally wrong, but typically a woman doesn't go from this:

and this:

to this:

and this:

without some help from this:

 

As you can see from the first two photos, she was quite large and got ridiculously larger. I wouldn't be surprised if they look fairly natural in motion as your non-posted youtube videos intend to prove; from what I understand the larger they are prior to augmentation, the harder it is to tell there was work done post augmentation.

As I said, I prefer natural and more proportion. Though still too top heavy, I think she looked much nicer in her photos on SportsbyBrooks.com (where wikipedia told me her modeling career began) than the Rippley's Believe it or Not worthy tits that consist of the majority of the photos found through a GIS of her name.

Author
Time

Sasha Grey. Retired from porn last month at age 23.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Ouch!

That looks like some kind of Humancentipad style experiment where a fat man's arse has been stitched under the chin of an attractive young Vulcan male.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

doubleKO said:

Sasha Grey. Retired from porn last month at age 23.

I used to have a boss who looked almost just like Sasha Grey. She was really fun to work for too.

I'd like Sasha Grey, but anything I have seen her in has been disturbingly abusive. Not the sort of thing I can appreciate.

 

I like how Mr. "obviously you're not willing to be proven wrong in the interest of actually learning something" has remained appropriately silent in light of my previous post. I sense a bit of projection in his unnecessarily zealous comment. I am, however, still more than welcome to the idea of being proven wrong and learning a thing of two if he or anyone else cares to try to explain her inexplicable growth spurt that doubled her boob size in adulthood. I am always open to learning something about boobs.

 

Author
Time

CP3S said:

Ziz said:

I was going to post some YouTube videos of her in motion that prove that she's not fake judging by the way she moves and the way certain types of clothing hang on her but obviously you're not willing to be proven wrong in the interest of actually learning something.

Easy there, killer! What's with the over reaction? I am always willing to be proven wrong and to learn something. Are you? You seem to be getting overly defensive about my accusation of her fake breasts being fake.

 

I could be totally wrong, but typically a woman doesn't go from this:

and this:

to this:

and this:

without some help from this:

 

As you can see from the first two photos, she was quite large and got ridiculously larger. I wouldn't be surprised if they look fairly natural in motion as your non-posted youtube videos intend to prove; from what I understand the larger they are prior to augmentation, the harder it is to tell there was work done post augmentation.

As I said, I prefer natural and more proportion. Though still too top heavy, I think she looked much nicer in her photos on SportsbyBrooks.com (where wikipedia told me her modeling career began) than the Rippley's Believe it or Not worthy tits that consist of the majority of the photos found through a GIS of her name.

Strangely ironic that the pics you use as proof of "before" are both shots where she's wearing a full size shirt that would naturally cover things up more where as the "after" shots are both bikini pics.

Find some "before" bikini pics or "after" shirt shots that prove your suspicion and I'll believe it, because it's obviously impossible that her chest could have continued to grow over the years, or that she could have worked out and exercised to get the rest of her body in a shape that would draw more attention to her chest.

There are also various forms of birth control that cause permanent hormonal changes in women, one of which being breast growth.  Birth control works by causing a woman's hormones to tell her body she's pregnant when she isn't.  One of the side effects of that false alarm is to increase milk production, which sometimes permanently increases breast size by stretching the muscle and tissue in that area.

Of course, since there's no documented proof one way or the other that any of this happened to her, it must be automatically a lie...right?

My outlook on life - we’re all on the Hindenburg anyway…no point fighting over the window seat.

Author
Time

TheBoost said: TNA Wrestling.

Surely this doesn't stand for what I was just thinking...

Author
Time

doubleKO said:

TheBoost said: TNA Wrestling.

Surely this doesn't stand for what I was just thinking...

Why would you be thinking about "TOTAL NONSTOP ACTION" while looking at this page?

Oh wait... nevermind.

I hope the ridiculously attractive and charming Erica Durance can find another show that doesn't suck, now that the attrocious "Smallville" is over.

Author
Time

RedFive said:

Now I'm the sort of guy that really appreciates a full, even ludicrous bossom, but I really hope that picture is photoshopped, because my only thought is "that poor woman!"

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Ziz said:

Strangely ironic that the pics you use as proof of "before" are both shots where she's wearing a full size shirt that would naturally cover things up more where as the "after" shots are both bikini pics.

...

Find some "before" bikini pics or "after" shirt shots that prove your suspicion and I'll believe it...

...

Of course, since there's no documented proof one way or the other that any of this happened to her, it must be automatically a lie...right?

I fail to see the irony, and those are hardly "full sized" shirts.

I accept your before and after challenge. Always love a good challenge, and when it involves boobs you just can't go wrong.

Before (Now with bikinis!):

After (Now with 100% more "full sized" shirts absolutely free!):

 

All I can say for sure is that she grew. And not a little, but a lot. They went from being big, to each being the size of her head. If contraceptives worked those kinds of wonders on all women in the breast enlargement department, you'd find a lot of plastic surgeons out of work. But no one is being enlightened and actually learning anything here. It is all just a matter of believing what pleases us the most. Since she doesn't do any nude shots (that I was able to find) there is no way to check for traces of scar tissue. So it goes.

 

 

 

Author
Time

Well researched CP3S. But we can't have all these Denise Milani boobs here without a pic in this costume:

This makes it all okay.

Author
Time

Shirley Jones has got to be one of the most lovely creatures to ever walk the Earth.

Author
Time

Sherry Jackson who played Andrea the Android in the Classic Star Trek episode 'What are little girls made of?'

She played other roles as well, but I haven't seen them.

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>