logo Sign In

All Things Star Trek — Page 64

Author
Time

Tobar said:

I'm not sure about that green.

Here are some vintage photos of the model before she was "restored" in the '90s.

Here's a thread dedicated to researching what was done to it in the '90s.

Colors and lights are funny, huh? That picture in your first link of the saucer from the side, looks exactly like what I saw yesterday. UV illumination & analysis has apparently confirmed that that's definitely the original paintjob. In fact, this article has a photo of that, plus confirmation that the very guy posting those pics, Doug Drexler, is on the advisory committee for this restoration.

I can't say for sure that they'll get rid of the 90s awful job, but I think it's likely. Dr. Weitekamp said near the end of her talk "I am well aware of the strong opinions in the fan community about the 90s restoration".

ROTJ Storyboard Reconstruction Project

Author
Time

Though I think TNG is inferior to TOS, there is one thing about TNG that I prefer over TOS: red being Starfleet's command division colour instead of gold.

Author
Time

darth_ender said:

skyjedi2005 said:

I know its probably blasphemy but i always preferred the model used in the motion picture the so called Refit.  The one they reused as the Enterprise A 

Wholeheartedly agree.

 I'm with these guys!

A poster of the photo below adorned my bedroom wall for many years.

“First feel fear, then get angry. Then go with your life into the fight.” - Bill Mollison

Author
Time

That photo came with the record I had of the motion picture sound track and yes it is a thing of beauty.

Author
Time

I'm not saying the refit isn't great. It's my favorite too. But there's something about the classic curves of the original E that really make my warp core rumble.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Oh yeah that was a brilliant piece of design work and it becomes even more amazing when you consider that it was made for TV, Matt Jefferies deserved to have those tubes name after him and if any Enterprise should be in a museum it's that one since it was the one all others were based on in some way.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Well I became a Trek fan around 1975 when the show went into heavy syndicated airplay. I was 8 or 9 years old, and the show became a huge part of my life. I had the tie-in toys, games and action figures. I had Kirk's uniform shirt (made the mistake of wearing it to school, but that is a story for another time...). Well I loved the original ship too. It was imprinted on my brain. In 1979 when I saw STMP for the first time, I hated the sets, the costumes, and the new look of the ship. It was not until I saw "The Wrath of Khan" and the re-lighted  and decorated sets, that I re-evaluated The Enterprise as seen in "The Motion Picture". That engine room set is still impressive. I don't think they have ever topped it.  The ship as seen in the first two films seemed to me like it could have been a real functional spaceship. The original series ship left a lot to the imagination as far as things like the control panels, and other props. It's the realism of the movie ship this makes it my personal favorite.  

“First feel fear, then get angry. Then go with your life into the fight.” - Bill Mollison

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

I'm not saying the refit isn't great. It's my favorite too. But there's something about the classic curves of the original E that really make my warp core rumble.

 These 'ofive posts are getting more disturbing by the day.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I once saw a drawing of the Enterprise anthropomorphized into a beautiful woman online. I'd post it here, but since it's NSFW (with bare breasts and exposed camel toe), I probably can't.

Author
Time

I envy these guys : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bun4qC5Szhw

Author
Time

Yeah I spent my childhood listening to the motion picture soundtrack(It is still my favorite movie soundtrack of all time)for years before I saw the movie and I kept imagining what kind of epic adventure the movie was set too, needless to say when i finally saw the movie on VHS it was a huge letdown.  They didn't really go anywhere, it took forever to get anything done, and Spock and McCoy didn't even argue and that was my favorite part of TOS when I was a kid. 

Thankfully I saw VH Followed by WOK a few weeks later and that redeemed the movies for me.

I still watch TMP from time to time because it isn't a bad movie but I can see how after ten years of waiting it was a letdown for fans.  I mean it was slow paced and it just retold the same story as an episode of the series.  I have a feeling if I had seen it in theaters I would have wanted my $5 back.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

timdiggerm said:

That article reads like a fan who just saw The Phantom Menace on opening night

 Yes, but David Gerrold actually wrote scripts for TOS. Easy to forget the mixed reception TMP actually got at the time.

Unlike TPM, most fans didn't want to come right out and badmouth the film. (At least not to the press camped out to get reactions.) We had waited so long for Trek to live again.

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

         My favorite ENTERPRISE is the plastic model of the TOS ship that was hanging over my bed from age 4 to 10.5.

         It was locked in perpetual battle with a Klingon cruiser.

         TOS starbattles were understandably limited and far between. I would imagine more furious and noisey engagements.

         When the opening sequence of SW ran those enormous ships over my head, I thought "Yep, that's more like it!"

Author
Time

I knew a kid back in the 70's who had built the entire Starfleet out of those AMT kits. It was all hanging from his ceiling. I was stunned at the sight.

IIRC, he kitbashed a couple ships that had only appeared in the technical manual.

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

SilverWook said:

Unlike TPM, most fans didn't want to come right out and badmouth the film. 

 I think this thread makes a pretty strong case for most everyone wanting to like TPM.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Tobar said:

SilverWook said:

Unlike TPM, most fans didn't want to come right out and badmouth the film. 

 I think this thread makes a pretty strong case for most everyone wanting to like TPM.

 Of course, most of us did want to like TPM. In the case of Trek, it was not wanting to harm this thing fans had kept alive, and taken years to convince the powers that be there was a market for new material. There was no "franchise" as it's thought of now.

There were fewer outlets to vent one's spleen back in 1979. You had to stay angry enough to write a ranting letter to Starlog or Cinefantastique, and maybe it saw print a few months later, or not. Even if you had a typewriter, you still needed to lick a stamp.

With modern technology, there's no "cooling off" period anymore.

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

I still love Nemesis, and I don't care who knows it!  Yes it's different and not exactly formula star trek, but there's just something about the tense and almost creepy ambiance that appeals to me.  Plus I LOVE the starfields in this movie in particular.  The one in the last space battle with the green tints to it always drew amazed me, especially when I saw it in the theater.

Author
Time

Possessed said:

I still love Nemesis, and I don't care who knows it!  Yes it's different and not exactly formula star trek, but there's just something about the tense and almost creepy ambiance that appeals to me.  Plus I LOVE the starfields in this movie in particular.  The one in the last space battle with the green tints to it always drew amazed me, especially when I saw it in the theater.

 Stuart Baird, is that you?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

There's something I don't get about the remastered version of TOS: Why haven't the phaser beams been redone?

All the original outer space shots have been replaced with cleaner CG versions, android guts have even been given digital facelifts, but the phaser beams still consist of the original crudely drawn red-and-blue lines.

I just don't get it.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Maybe it was a budgetary thing? With no "clean" shots to work with, the most they could do is paint over the original animation, and probably end up with thicker beams than the originals.

IIRC, they did enhance the shot of Scotty cutting into a bulkhead in The Naked Time. The Phaser had no visible beam in the original.

With TNG, they had the original 35mm raw footage available to rebuild optical FX shots.

Where were you in '77?