TV's Frink said:
I'm only being a busybody because you are opinionated and attack anyone who has even the slightest difference of opinion.
I don't do anything of the sort. Stop equating strongly expressed disagreement with attacking. They're not the same thing at all. It's patently absurd to say I attack anyone who has the slightest difference of opinion. I do nothing of the sort. There are certain people I will be less patient with due to past troubles (such as C3PX, on this thread), but I don't go around just attacking people for disagreeing with me. All I do is disagree with them. Which some people seem to interpret as an attack.
Your attempt to justify your busybody behavior doesn't work. You're just out of line. And you'll note that I don't usually come along and butt into a conversation to tell other people how they should post (like you've been doing). Despite your vilification of me, I follow certain principles as to you what's ok to do in posting. Whereas you don't seem to be so restrained.
And you don't like "my" movie? Hilarious. I'm only vaguely curious about this movie, mainly due to what ESF expressed:
Well then you shouldn't need to get so bent out of shape if somebody expresses a lack of enthusiasm for it.
Here's a typical VINH argument, from the first page of this thread:
Vaderisnothayden said:
Fuck 3d. We don't need it. Stupid gimmick. I wish George Lucas would stop going on about putting Star wars on 3d and restore the OOT instead.
Nice. And what a surprise, you managed to insert Lucas into the discussion again.
Oh terrible, how horrible, I expressed dislike for a big fad gimmick. How profane! And wtf is wrong with bringing Lucas into the discussion? This is a Star Wars site.
I know you said this to CA but I'm sure it was directed at me as well. I can assure you we're not the only ones that feel this way about you.
Yeah, well people like to copy each others' opinions. It's a known thing. That some people might have a narrow-minded prejudiced attitude toward me doesn't make that attitude or its views right. All you're doing is ganging up on someone who thinks differently from you, just because they come off different. It's not this enlightened thing.
I think it's hilarious that you have Nanner on ignore.
I don't see what's hilarious about it. The guy clearly has a lot of hostility toward me, so it's pretty reasonable to have him on ignore. As for reading his posts, I may read them or I may not read them. The ignore function makes it much more a choice.
TV's Frink said:
How long is your ignore list? I'll bet you have to do a lot of scrolling to get to the bottom of it. Isn't it time to add me to that list?
Sorry, you're not going on it just yet. Sorry to disappoint you. But that doesn't mean I'm necessarily going to keep answering your garbage.
ChainsawAsh said:
HotRod said:
ChainsawAsh said:
I think you give up the right to say "don't lecture me" when you've been a giant dick to anyone who doesn't share your opinion.
Indeed he has...But, there's really no point in me replying to his posts as I'm on his ignore list anyway!!
And now he's on mine, so that problem's solved.
And thanks for the support, Frink.
Hopefully this means ChainsawAsh won't be pestering me anymore.