logo Sign In

AVATAR and 3D in general.... — Page 3

Author
Time

C3PX said:

Really? What makes you think he/she/it is a lady? You thought the Gaffer was a lady too. Perhaps you just have an inclination to assume people are ladies? Or maybe Octocrox actually is a lady and you know what you are talking about on this one.

As for me, I am still the old fashioned sort that doesn't believe in cursing in front of ladies, and since I have the unfortunate tendancy to let one slip on these forums ever now and then, I like to assume this is a mostly estrogen free zone (with the exception of vbangle, who I believe is made up entirely of estrogen; and who will never know I said this about him because he has me on ignore).

Eh, the ladies curse in front of me all the time so I don't really mind. Maybe it's a generational thing. For me it's an issue of appropriateness. I won't curse in a formal environment at all. I won't curse in front of professors. I won't curse in front of my parents unless out of anger. I won't curse In front of others in a loose environment unless they themselves are cursing. I find it a pretty good balance.

(I like how this discussion has turned from Avatar to etiquette. I will be seriously disappointed if someone tries to "salvage" the topic.)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Octorox said:

Eh, the ladies curse in front of me all the time so I don't really mind.

So, should we take this to infer that you are, in fact, a lady?

Hmm, someone should start an etiquette thread... it is actually a very interesting topic.

EDIT: Didn't see the post Octorox made on the last page. If it makes you feel any better, Oct, I too (for whatever reason) have been called "Ma'am" or "she" a couple of times here too. Maybe it is just wishful thinking on the part of some of the guys here who have yet to realize that people with vaginas typically don't obsess over things like CG being added to their favorite movies and ruining them.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time

C3PX said:

Really? What makes you think he/she/it is a lady? You thought the Gaffer was a lady too. Perhaps you just have an inclination to assume people are ladies? Or maybe Octocrox actually is a lady and you know what you are talking about on this one.

Octo's old avatar was a Princess Leia Mii.  He clearly stated, "Not a woman" or something like that next to his avatar, but I don't let that keep me from making jokes.  I will never admit to having said this, but I know Gaffer is not a woman.  It's mildly amusing to me to keep insisting she is, however.  Sort of like the whole ignoring over the use of the non-word  ##regardless.  I suspect I will keep doing it to the delight and laughter of no one.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

Oh, and I bought tickets for the wife and me to see Avatar next Saturday.  I'll be sure to let you all know how we liked it.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

Wow, my track record on getting jokes over the past few days looks pretty lousy. First Gaffer's penis mightier joke, and now this.

I guess I just don't pay much attention to the text next to user's avatars.

Anyway, don't get me wrong Xhonzi, I too find these jokes amusing. I knew you intentionally kept calling Gaff "she", so I really should have picked up on Octorox thing being the same sort of joke. Now it seems really obvious.

Is it bad I don't know what a "Princess Leia Mii" is? Is anything like a Padmii?

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
 (Edited)

You know, Wii Mii's?  Wii Avatars?

Though his might have been an xbox avatar...  I think she had shoulders.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Octorox said:

Reviews have been pretty positive. I think I'm going to make the leap. I looks like it will be a really fun event film and not 2 hours of mind melting mess like Transformers 2 was. And to the person who said it looks like a cartoon, whats wrong with cartoons? I think you guys need to lighten up a little bit ;).

And To VINH, I gotta say that the political connotations of EpIII was really no more overt than any of the political undertones of the OT . You just happen not to agree with with some of the allegorical ties EPIII suggests. It draws just as heavily from other sources like the Vietnam War and the rise of the Roman Empire as it does to the Bush Administration. It deals with the ideas of decietful politicians, conspiracies, and fear mongering which doesn't have to be about the Bush Administration, although some would say it reflects the general climate at the time. Lucas said he was more concerned with referencing Vietnam than Bush.

(Note that I am not defending EpIII as a great film, it is still highly flawed and I believe many reviews (particularly Ebert, and I love that guy!) were very inflated and just didn't have any demands on integrity to the original series)

Also, The reason EpIII was positively received by critics (as I see it)  is because it wasn't boring (like EpII) and it wasn't overtly goofy and childish nor ridiculously overhyped (like EPI). The dialogue was poorly written but it did provide the great spectacle and grand scope that people were looking for.

(P.S. I realize that my avatar is not lending any validity to the seriousness of my argument)

Yeah I know Lucas said he was talking about Vietnam not the the present, but since when did we start believing George Lucas? The Bush references in ROTS are shout-out-loud. No, they're nothing like the political undertones in the OT. Those were much more subtle. And why should my not agreeing with ROTS's politics make me any more bothered by it than by the politics in the OT? I don't agree with the politics in the OT either. I just amn't bothered by the OT politics because they don't beat you over the head and they're not this cheap superficial thing stuff shoved in to get credit.

And to the person who said it looks like a cartoon, whats wrong with cartoons?

Cartoons don't look real. A live action film should look real. So if a live action film looks like a cartoon you have a problem. Like with 97 Jabba and Jar Jar.

Why should we lighten up? The hype for this film isn't lightening up. It's all "this is a serious worthy film about important stuff" and "this is an IMPORTANT cinema event". When they lighten maybe we will.

Also, The reason EpIII was positively received by critics (as I see it)  is because it wasn't boring (like EpII) and it wasn't overtly goofy and childish nor ridiculously overhyped (like EPI). The dialogue was poorly written but it did provide the great spectacle and grand scope that people were looking for.

Except it WAS boring. It WAS overly childish. As for great spectacle, I beg to differ -meaningless overdone show, more like. As for grand scope, it pretended to that, but it didn't have it with any depth. ROTS got better reviews because of its fashionable politics and because people bought the film's big idea of itself.

Reviews have been pretty positive. I think I'm going to make the leap.

Why should reviews have any bearing on your seeing the film? Reviewers always get stuff wrong.

C3PX said:

As for me, I am still the old fashioned sort that doesn't believe in cursing in front of ladies, and since I have the unfortunate tendancy to let one slip on these forums ever now and then, I like to assume this is a mostly estrogen free zone (with the exception of vbangle, who I believe is made up entirely of estrogen; and who will never know I said this about him because he has me on ignore).

Why would women be any less able than men to handle cursing around them? I can see no reason why anybody should curse any less around women than around men. And there's nothing "unfortunate" about cursing. There's nothing wrong with cursing whatsoever.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Maybe I am in the minority here, but I thought the visuals and music were mostly okay to fine in episode III despite some over the top sillyness.

But the script was pure awful and so was the execution in directing the actors for all three prequel films. But Episodes II and III were far worse at least episode 1 focused somewhat on character development and was shot on film and had real models along with the painfully out of place in star wars cgi and cartoon characters not at all in step with the mentality of the oot.

The editing was Crap the cinematography was nothing to write home about the effects looked cheap not in cost but in being a cheat.

The music unmemorable except for Anakin's Theme in Episode 1, Duel of the Fates, Across the stars and battle of the heroes. 

If Jedi was a step down from star wars and empire in quality the prequels are are mere shadow of even the worst moments of jedi.

The swashbuckling adventure Lucas somewhat hinted at bringing back in Episodes II and III was nowhere to be found.  Instead you got a 4 hour video game that was non interactive, and were bored to tears by the politics, and there were no likeable characters i hated the jedi and sith and republic and empire and seperatists they all came of as false and not real characters.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time

Silly Frink... there's no such thing as a "topic" per se... it just moves.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Vaderisnothayden said:

C3PX said:

As for me, I am still the old fashioned sort that doesn't believe in cursing in front of ladies, and since I have the unfortunate tendancy to let one slip on these forums ever now and then, I like to assume this is a mostly estrogen free zone (with the exception of vbangle, who I believe is made up entirely of estrogen; and who will never know I said this about him because he has me on ignore).

Why would women be any less able than men to handle cursing around them? I can see no reason why anybody should curse any less around women than around men. And there's nothing "unfortunate" about cursing. There's nothing wrong with cursing whatsoever.

 

"Wrong" is very relative term. There is nothing wrong with a lot of things, but I'd still prefer to refrain from them.

The bottom line is cursing offends some people, and from that stand point I'd, personally, prefer to avoid it. By cursing in my posts, to some degree, I alienate fellow users who find it offensive. It also has the tendency to sound very uneducated. When you hear someone who curses every other word, do you think to yourself, "Wow, this individual is a master communicator"? Probably not. I often hear someone curse and think to myself how stupid they just sounded, and realize I probably sound just are retarded as they did when I curse. Again, I do it myself, so I am not condemning anyone. I just have a huge amount of respect for people who do not.

As for not cursing in front of women, you are right, there is really no reason they couldn't handle it any less than anyone else, it is just an old fashion courtesy and a sign of respect. I still stand when someone enters the room as well, so yeah, I am pretty lame like that. I have held onto these kinds of things since I was a teenager; I think I only started doing them because nobody else did, and my parents never taught me to do them. Probably just part of my youthful desire to be different than everyone else.

In our culture, we have reached the point were swearing is so common place, that to me anyway, that it comes off as pretty lame and not as bold, cool, and "badass" and the speaker intends. I guess the thing that makes cursing "cool" is that it is a "nonconformist" sort of thing to do. Society says swearing is bad, so every would be rebel out there does it. Presently, society seems to accept swearing to a good degree. It is no longer the taboo that it used to be. Case in point, I can drop the "f-bomb" on this forum, and no one complains; but I say it is "unfortunate" that I have a habit of cursing, and I am immediately called to the mat. Today, maybe not swearing would be far more nonconformist than intentionally mistaking the f word as a necessary form of verbal punctuation. 

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time

What if you said the "i" non-word?

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

C3PX said:

I guess the thing that makes cursing "cool" is that it is a "nonconformist" sort of thing to do. Society says swearing is bad, so every would be rebel out there does it.

I've honestly never thought that much about swearing.  I swear because I do.  I'm not trying to be a conformist, or a non-conformist, or cool, or badass, or anything.  I grew up with constant swearing all around me (mainly from my father), so to me, it's just how I talk.

By the way, this thread has veered pretty fucking far away from Avatar and 3D.  (Yes, that was intentional this time.)  So I'll throw my two cents in on this subject as of now:

As I said, I was very underwhelmed by the first trailer.  The second was better, but still not "HOLY SHIT I HAVE TO SEE THIS NOW!!!" by any means.  Now, the reviews are overwhelmingly positive.

So I'm gong to go, with modest expectations, to see it at the Navy Pier IMAX in Chicago on Friday.  I'm not holding my breath for a "revolution in cinema" or whatever the hell Cameron thinks this movie is, but I'm intrigued enough to see it.  I would see it in a regular theater since it wasn't shot in IMAX, but of all types of 3D I've seen, the only one that has ever immersed me properly is IMAX 3D, most likely because the screen envelops your entire field of vision, unlike a regular screen.  So Avatar will be an exception to my usual rule of "see it how it was shot."

If it's good, I'll see it again in 2D to see how that changes things.  The 2D version will also be in the 2.39:1 aspect ratio, whereas the 3D version will be 1.78:1, so that should be an interesting comparison (I prefer 2.39:1 generally, but I see how 1.78:1 would be better for 3D).

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Same on the trailers CA.

Im not going to get any oppertunity to see it in IMAX so that would be a great experiment chainsaw.

I dont like the current bombardment of 3D media we're getting here in blighty, when all we get is the green and red specs of yesteryear to view it with (marketing push?).

The last chance i got of to see any technical evolution in 3D that didnt get plugged half as much was with Captain EO, and it looked monochrome through the goggles. It was mainly unconvincing, and technicaly underwhelming in the same way the green and red goggles were. 

Friends raved about how incredible the Terminator 2 thing was in 3D, but after seeing it in 2D i believe the 3D thing was the real selling point of experience. I wouldn't, and havent gone out of my way to experience that given the chance since Cpt EO.

Now, i sigh with the advent of 3D high def TVs, and a whole new list of studios going 3D with their future releases.

Avatar has a hell of a unfounded benchmark to set, and most of my work mates aint even heard of it at the this of wrighting.

So, if it is all its said to be (other than a marketing push) im still luke warm/bordering interested, based on the probible mixed reactions its going to no doubt get.

Author
Time

ChainsawAsh said:

C3PX said:

I guess the thing that makes cursing "cool" is that it is a "nonconformist" sort of thing to do. Society says swearing is bad, so every would be rebel out there does it.

I've honestly never thought that much about swearing.  I swear because I do.  I'm not trying to be a conformist, or a non-conformist, or cool, or badass, or anything.  I grew up with constant swearing all around me (mainly from my father), so to me, it's just how I talk.

By the way, this thread has veered pretty fucking far away from Avatar and 3D.  (Yes, that was intentional this time.)  So I'll throw my two cents in on this subject as of now:

As I said, I was very underwhelmed by the first trailer.  The second was better, but still not "HOLY SHIT I HAVE TO SEE THIS NOW!!!" by any means.  Now, the reviews are overwhelmingly positive.

So I'm gong to go, with modest expectations, to see it at the Navy Pier IMAX in Chicago on Friday.  I'm not holding my breath for a "revolution in cinema" or whatever the hell Cameron thinks this movie is, but I'm intrigued enough to see it.  I would see it in a regular theater since it wasn't shot in IMAX, but of all types of 3D I've seen, the only one that has ever immersed me properly is IMAX 3D, most likely because the screen envelops your entire field of vision, unlike a regular screen.  So Avatar will be an exception to my usual rule of "see it how it was shot."

If it's good, I'll see it again in 2D to see how that changes things.  The 2D version will also be in the 2.39:1 aspect ratio, whereas the 3D version will be 1.78:1, so that should be an interesting comparison (I prefer 2.39:1 generally, but I see how 1.78:1 would be better for 3D).

Thank you Chainsawash! 

Author
Time

C3PX said:

Vaderisnothayden said:

C3PX said:

As for me, I am still the old fashioned sort that doesn't believe in cursing in front of ladies, and since I have the unfortunate tendancy to let one slip on these forums ever now and then, I like to assume this is a mostly estrogen free zone (with the exception of vbangle, who I believe is made up entirely of estrogen; and who will never know I said this about him because he has me on ignore).

Why would women be any less able than men to handle cursing around them? I can see no reason why anybody should curse any less around women than around men. And there's nothing "unfortunate" about cursing. There's nothing wrong with cursing whatsoever.

 

"Wrong" is very relative term. There is nothing wrong with a lot of things, but I'd still prefer to refrain from them.

The bottom line is cursing offends some people, and from that stand point I'd, personally, prefer to avoid it. By cursing in my posts, to some degree, I alienate fellow users who find it offensive. It also has the tendency to sound very uneducated. When you hear someone who curses every other word, do you think to yourself, "Wow, this individual is a master communicator"? Probably not. I often hear someone curse and think to myself how stupid they just sounded, and realize I probably sound just are retarded as they did when I curse. Again, I do it myself, so I am not condemning anyone. I just have a huge amount of respect for people who do not.

As for not cursing in front of women, you are right, there is really no reason they couldn't handle it any less than anyone else, it is just an old fashion courtesy and a sign of respect. I still stand when someone enters the room as well, so yeah, I am pretty lame like that. I have held onto these kinds of things since I was a teenager; I think I only started doing them because nobody else did, and my parents never taught me to do them. Probably just part of my youthful desire to be different than everyone else.

In our culture, we have reached the point were swearing is so common place, that to me anyway, that it comes off as pretty lame and not as bold, cool, and "badass" and the speaker intends. I guess the thing that makes cursing "cool" is that it is a "nonconformist" sort of thing to do. Society says swearing is bad, so every would be rebel out there does it. Presently, society seems to accept swearing to a good degree. It is no longer the taboo that it used to be. Case in point, I can drop the "f-bomb" on this forum, and no one complains; but I say it is "unfortunate" that I have a habit of cursing, and I am immediately called to the mat. Today, maybe not swearing would be far more nonconformist than intentionally mistaking the f word as a necessary form of verbal punctuation. 

 "The bottom line is cursing offends some people, and from that stand point I'd, personally, prefer to avoid it."

They're offended because they choose to be offended. They could just as easily choose to be more open-minded and not get offended. If somebody's offended by swearing that's their problem. It's not a reason why other people should have to censor their speech.

"It also has the tendency to sound very uneducated. When you hear someone who curses every other word, do you think to yourself, "Wow, this individual is a master communicator"? Probably not. I often hear someone curse and think to myself how stupid they just sounded, and realize I probably sound just are retarded as they did when I curse."

Well, that's dumb. I don't go making stupid assumptions about people's intelligence or education when I hear them swearing. I know that swearing has nothing to do with education or intelligence. I don't have a hangup about intelligence and education and I'm not worried about how educated or intelligent I sound, so I don't worry if swearing will make somebody think something about my level of education or intelligence. Swearing does not lessen communication and it is no evidence of a lack of ability to communicate. It's rather dumb to think it is. I've never thought somebody sounded stupid just because they cursed. But when I hear people criticising swearing I do tend to think "What a narrow-minded stick-in-the-mud".

"As for not cursing in front of women, you are right, there is really no reason they couldn't handle it any less than anyone else, it is just an old fashion courtesy and a sign of respect."

Old fashioned sexism, really. Ultimately therefore a sign of DISrespect.

"In our culture, we have reached the point were swearing is so common place, that to me anyway, that it comes off as pretty lame and not as bold, cool, and "badass" and the speaker intends. I guess the thing that makes cursing "cool" is that it is a "nonconformist" sort of thing to do. Society says swearing is bad, so every would be rebel out there does it. Presently, society seems to accept swearing to a good degree. It is no longer the taboo that it used to be. Case in point, I can drop the "f-bomb" on this forum, and no one complains; but I say it is "unfortunate" that I have a habit of cursing, and I am immediately called to the mat. Today, maybe not swearing would be far more nonconformist than intentionally mistaking the f word as a necessary form of verbal punctuation. "

Swearing is not about being cool or badass or nonconformist. It's about putting vigour and expression into your speech in a way that is not duplicated by other methods. I don't see why swearing being commonplace should make it lame. People saying "hello" is commonplace too, but that doesn't make it especially lame.

"Case in point, I can drop the "f-bomb" on this forum, and no one complains; but I say it is "unfortunate" that I have a habit of cursing, and I am immediately called to the mat."

With good reason. When you swear you just express yourself, but when you express disapproval of swearing you condemn the actions of others.

"Today, maybe not swearing would be far more nonconformist than intentionally mistaking the f word as a necessary form of verbal punctuation. "

Being anti-swearing is being narrow-minded and overly conservative.

"It is no longer the taboo that it used to be."

Yes it is. Here we can swear, but on many internet forums swearing isn't allowed at all. Off the net, society still applies plenty of disapproval in many countries. Very narrow-minded attempts to censor swearing are all over the place. 

 

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Anyway, I think I proved my point about it (not swearing) being countercultural simply based upon your reaction to my post. My feelings on not swearing seems to offend you in a way that swearing has offended many people before you.

Somewhat related to this, last night over a few G&Ts one of my buddies informed the rest of us that he finds the word "penis" far more offensive than the words "cock" or "dick". Perhaps someday in the distant future we will have a cartoon like South Park that wants to be offensive and shocking and will use words like "had sex with" and "feces" to shock and offend the hell out of its audience after words like "fuck" and "shit" have completely lost the intensity they once had.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
 (Edited)

What do you guys think about swearing in 3D?

And VINH, you must be a blast at birthday parties for kids.

Author
Time

C3PX, I think we're moving in the direction where it will be more shocking and intimate to eat lunch together than it is to copulate.  Perhaps hour-rates hotels will spring up in the nice part of town and located near offices, and restaurants where you can see other people eating (putting food in their oral orifices, mixing it with oral based lubricant and tenderizer, masticating, etc...) will be become hot and taboo.  And socially unacceptable.

So... my AMC is showing Avatar in Real-D and IMAX 3D.  From what you know, Chainsawash, are both of those in academy, or just the IMAX one?

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Vaderisnothayden said:

They're offended because they choose to be offended. They could just as easily choose to be more open-minded and not get offended. If somebody's offended by swearing that's their problem. It's not a reason why other people should have to censor their speech.

Or you could simply choose not to be offensive and save them the trouble. Lets for a second assume all who are offended by cursing are worthless close minded individuals who simply make life miserable for the rest of us; what about young children? If you had (and perhaps you do have) kids, would there be (or are there) any words you would feel would be inappropriate to use in front of them?

Well, that's dumb. I don't go making stupid assumptions about people's intelligence or education when I hear them swearing. I know that swearing has nothing to do with education or intelligence...

Which sounds more educated?

(a) "The other fuckin' day, I went to the fuckin' grocery store and they fuckin' had their fuckin' milk on sale for a two fuckin' forty-five a gallon! I bought three fuckin' cartons... shit that was a good deal."

(b) "The other day, I went to the grocery store and they had their milk on sale for two forty-five gallon! I bought three cartons... that was a good deal."

Swearing does not lessen communication and it is no evidence of a lack of ability to communicate. It's rather dumb to think it is. I've never thought somebody sounded stupid just because they cursed. But when I hear people criticising swearing I do tend to think "What a narrow-minded stick-in-the-mud".

In my above question, which speaker is communicating more clearly? Is it (a) or (b)?

"As for not cursing in front of women, you are right, there is really no reason they couldn't handle it any less than anyone else, it is just an old fashion courtesy and a sign of respect."

Old fashioned sexism, really. Ultimately therefore a sign of DISrespect.

I also hold doors open for women. Most of the time they are appreciative of it, but every now and then one "chooses" to be offended by it. So yeah, I probably would accurately fit into the modern definition of the word "sexist". 

 

Swearing is not about being cool or badass or nonconformist. It's about putting vigour and expression into your speech in a way that is not duplicated by other methods. I don't see why swearing being commonplace should make it lame. People saying "hello" is commonplace too, but that doesn't make it especially lame.

Thank you for brining up the point of "vigor" and "expression" this is quite true. You could use swearing to add weight to what you are saying. For example, someone saying, "Are you fucking kidding me!" I could assume to be more angry than someone just simply saying, "Are you kidding me!" But with over use, the potency of these words is greatly diminished. "Hello" is a very different sort of a word, it is a greeting and is meant to be used on a very frequent basis.

With good reason. When you swear you just express yourself, but when you express disapproval of swearing you condemn the actions of others.

I stated quite simply that I was not condemning anyone. If I were to make the argument that "Manual transmission cars are better than automatics", would you think I was condemning all who drive automatics?

"Today, maybe not swearing would be far more nonconformist than intentionally mistaking the f word as a necessary form of verbal punctuation. "

Being anti-swearing is being narrow-minded and overly conservative.

Fair enough. If that is how you feel about it, no point in trying to convince you otherwise.

"It is no longer the taboo that it used to be."

Yes it is. Here we can swear, but on many internet forums swearing isn't allowed at all. Off the net, society still applies plenty of disapproval in many countries. Very narrow-minded attempts to censor swearing are all over the place. 

If you need proof it is no longer as taboo as it used to be, let's take a look at its use in movies and other media today in comparison with its use in movies and media back in the 1930's. Can we not concede that there is a pretty big difference? We've come along ways from "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn" being considered controversial.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
 (Edited)

C3PX just gave a very important forum lesson on how to avoid:

1) Double quoting
2) Double posting

Thanks for that :-)

Author
Time

My pleasure.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time

C3PX said:

Anyway, I think I proved my point about it (not swearing) being countercultural simply based upon your reaction to my post. My feelings on not swearing seems to offend you in a way that swearing has offended many people before you.

That assumes that I somehow represent the culture. I don't. I am an atypical individual. If something is at odds with me it doesn't prove it's countercultural.

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

C3PX said:

Vaderisnothayden said:

They're offended because they choose to be offended. They could just as easily choose to be more open-minded and not get offended. If somebody's offended by swearing that's their problem. It's not a reason why other people should have to censor their speech.

Or you could simply choose not to be offensive and save them the trouble. Lets for a second assume all who are offended by cursing are worthless close minded individuals who simply make life miserable for the rest of us; what about young children? If you had (and perhaps you do have) kids, would there be (or are there) any words you would feel would be inappropriate to use in front of them?

Well, that's dumb. I don't go making stupid assumptions about people's intelligence or education when I hear them swearing. I know that swearing has nothing to do with education or intelligence...

Which sounds more educated?

(a) "The other fuckin' day, I went to the fuckin' grocery store and they fuckin' had their fuckin' milk on sale for a two fuckin' forty-five a gallon! I bought three fuckin' cartons... shit that was a good deal."

(b) "The other day, I went to the grocery store and they had their milk on sale for two forty-five gallon! I bought three cartons... that was a good deal."

Swearing does not lessen communication and it is no evidence of a lack of ability to communicate. It's rather dumb to think it is. I've never thought somebody sounded stupid just because they cursed. But when I hear people criticising swearing I do tend to think "What a narrow-minded stick-in-the-mud".

In my above question, which speaker is communicating more clearly? Is it (a) or (b)?

"As for not cursing in front of women, you are right, there is really no reason they couldn't handle it any less than anyone else, it is just an old fashion courtesy and a sign of respect."

Old fashioned sexism, really. Ultimately therefore a sign of DISrespect.

I also hold doors open for women. Most of the time they are appreciative of it, but every now and then one "chooses" to be offended by it. So yeah, I probably would accurately fit into the modern definition of the word "sexist". 

 

Swearing is not about being cool or badass or nonconformist. It's about putting vigour and expression into your speech in a way that is not duplicated by other methods. I don't see why swearing being commonplace should make it lame. People saying "hello" is commonplace too, but that doesn't make it especially lame.

Thank you for brining up the point of "vigor" and "expression" this is quite true. You could use swearing to add weight to what you are saying. For example, someone saying, "Are you fucking kidding me!" I could assume to be more angry than someone just simply saying, "Are you kidding me!" But with over use, the potency of these words is greatly diminished. "Hello" is a very different sort of a word, it is a greeting and is meant to be used on a very frequent basis.

With good reason. When you swear you just express yourself, but when you express disapproval of swearing you condemn the actions of others.

I stated quite simply that I was not condemning anyone. If I were to make the argument that "Manual transmission cars are better than automatics", would you think I was condemning all who drive automatics?

"Today, maybe not swearing would be far more nonconformist than intentionally mistaking the f word as a necessary form of verbal punctuation. "

Being anti-swearing is being narrow-minded and overly conservative.

Fair enough. If that is how you feel about it, no point in trying to convince you otherwise.

"It is no longer the taboo that it used to be."

Yes it is. Here we can swear, but on many internet forums swearing isn't allowed at all. Off the net, society still applies plenty of disapproval in many countries. Very narrow-minded attempts to censor swearing are all over the place. 

If you need proof it is no longer as taboo as it used to be, let's take a look at its use in movies and other media today in comparison with its use in movies and media back in the 1930's. Can we not concede that there is a pretty big difference? We've come along ways from "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn" being considered controversial.

"Or you could simply choose not to be offensive and save them the trouble."

Well seeing as swearing isn't offensive, any trouble is of their own making. There's no reason why I should censor my speech to satisfy the prejudices of others.

"what about young children? If you had (and perhaps you do have) kids, would there be (or are there) any words you would feel would be inappropriate to use in front of them?"

Nope. Swearing does children no harm whatsoever. People should let children swear and let children hear swearing.

"Which sounds more educated? (a) "The other fuckin' day, I went to the fuckin' grocery store and they fuckin' had their fuckin' milk on sale for a two fuckin' forty-five a gallon! I bought three fuckin' cartons... shit that was a good deal." (b) "The other day, I went to the grocery store and they had their milk on sale for two forty-five gallon! I bought three cartons... that was a good deal.""

Neither. The isn't an education difference. Your whole education difference thing is just class prejudice. You associate swearing with working class and you assume working class people have less education. It's a common attitude. Attitudes against swearing have a lot to do with class prejudice. And don't come out with the excuse that you're working class, because working class people are certainly not incapable of being prejudiced against working class.

"In my above question, which speaker is communicating more clearly? Is it (a) or (b)?"

They're both communicating perfectly clearly.

"I also hold doors open for women. Most of the time they are appreciative of it, but every now and then one "chooses" to be offended by it. So yeah, I probably would accurately fit into the modern definition of the word "sexist"."

And your attitudes are more harmful than you realize, because they imply certain attitudes about the capabilities and position of women. As for those women who don't mind you holding open doors for them, some of them may not realize you only hold open doors for women and may think you're just a polite guy who holds open doors for people in general. If they realized you were just doing it on account of their gender they might be less pleased. You imply that women being offended by this stuff is the same as people being offended by swearing, but there is the simple difference that women are right to be offended, while the anti-swearing crowd are not.

"But with over use, the potency of these words is greatly diminished."

I don't find their potency to be diminished.

"I stated quite simply that I was not condemning anyone. If I were to make the argument that "Manual transmission cars are better than automatics", would you think I was condemning all who drive automatics?"

Your car statement is rather more neutral. There's no issue of morality involved so there's no moral disapproval implied. When you state an attitude against swearing you are criticising those who swear.

"If you need proof it is no longer as taboo as it used to be, let's take a look at its use in movies and other media today in comparison with its use in movies and media back in the 1930's. Can we not concede that there is a pretty big difference? We've come along ways from "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn" being considered controversial."

It may not be as taboo as it used to be, but it's still plenty taboo.

 

 

 

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

VINH just gave a very important forum lesson on how to NOT avoid:

1) Double quoting
2) Double posting

Fixed :-(