logo Sign In

AOTC rating

Author
Time
Here in germany it always had the "ages 12 and up" stamp (mainly because of the Jango beheading scene, that was even cut out of the british version if I remember correctly), but I seem to recall it was originally planned to get an "ages 6 years and up" rating.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Master Sifo-Dyas
Here in germany it always had the "ages 12 and up" stamp (mainly because of the Jango beheading scene, that was even cut out of the british version if I remember correctly), but I seem to recall it was originally planned to get an "ages 6 years and up" rating.


Oh, I was wondering this because I got it at the same store together with SWBFII and ROTS. I thought they lowered the rating because of ROTS.
.: Revenge of the Jedi 0.83 MS Edition :.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Master Sifo-Dyas
Here in germany it always had the "ages 12 and up" stamp (mainly because of the Jango beheading scene, that was even cut out of the british version if I remember correctly), but I seem to recall it was originally planned to get an "ages 6 years and up" rating.


As far as I know, Jango's death wasn't cut. The headbutt in the Obi-Wan/Jango-fight was. Quite stupid if you ask me. Here in Denmark it's uncut and rated 11.
"The things that stick in my mind and make me laugh were, like, memos worried about whether or not the Wookie should have pants. They're looking at this thing and saying, "Couldn't he have some lederhosen?" This is great. Of all the things to worry about, the Wookie has no pants." -Mark Hamill
Author
Time
I feel sorry for you guys. I do not get how they cut it out and it still make since? Can someone tell me how the scene goes without the beheading?


Author
Time
I can't stand the censors. They think they know what's best for people and think they should moderate everything people see, while in reality, people can make up THEIR OWN minds whether or not they want to watch something. It is not the job of a group to decide what everyone else needs to see.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Adamwankenobi
I can't stand the censors. They think they know what's best for people and think they should moderate everything people see, while in reality, people can make up THEIR OWN minds whether or not they want to watch something. It is not the job of a group to decide what everyone else needs to see.


I'm happy they don't do this over here in Belgium, so whe always get the uncut version
.: Revenge of the Jedi 0.83 MS Edition :.
Author
Time
I suppose conservatism doesn't run rampant in Belgium, then? Unfortuantely, it does here in the US. VERY BADLY.
Author
Time
Generally, when you're a left-wing in Europe, you're what right-wing Americans would probably refer to as a "dirty commie bastard". The politics are probably a lot less conservative here. People can swear on TV, most movies are uncensored etc. As far as I know, Britain is really the only country here that is more strict when it comes to censorship.
"The things that stick in my mind and make me laugh were, like, memos worried about whether or not the Wookie should have pants. They're looking at this thing and saying, "Couldn't he have some lederhosen?" This is great. Of all the things to worry about, the Wookie has no pants." -Mark Hamill
Author
Time
Well, here in the US, everyone seems to be worried about everyone else. The censors and the rest of the conservatives wish to control what everyone sees, rather than letting the idivduals CHOOSE. Hmm, who's the "dirty commie bastards" now?

I mean, we're talking about the country who allows their dim-witted president to spy on them all in the name of "freedom." Ugh.
Author
Time
Battlewars, in the name of...
"The things that stick in my mind and make me laugh were, like, memos worried about whether or not the Wookie should have pants. They're looking at this thing and saying, "Couldn't he have some lederhosen?" This is great. Of all the things to worry about, the Wookie has no pants." -Mark Hamill
Author
Time


I had to import my DVD of Clones from America, to have the uncut version, from what ive read they were offered a higher rating by UK censors for the uncut version to be shown but the distributors refused the higher rating and took the lower rating so the uk had the cut version


Brithish Censors answer
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Mr Bungle
I had to import my DVD of Clones from America, to have the uncut version, from what ive read they were offered a higher rating by UK censors for the uncut version to be shown but the distributors refused the higher rating and took the lower rating so the uk had the cut version


Brithish Censors answer


LOL! Then why do they don't cut the sequence of Vader cutting Luke's hand of in ESB. Vader had a mechanical arms and Luke has organic ones, so why leave it in there. Then just give the movie a higher rating then cutting a beheading scene of just 1 second.
.: Revenge of the Jedi 0.83 MS Edition :.
Author
Time
I can only imagine how the UK censors must have butchered ROTS! LOL!
Author
Time


Sith is uncut, it had the "12" higher rating, they have certain rules on things like headbutts etc in films for younger people like Star Wars, they used to be very strict even with adult rated films until a few years ago, when they changed the person in charge of the BBFC. so they are less strict now and most things now get through uncut, but certain things like animal creulty are still a big no-no and are still cut from films etc
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Mr Bungle
Sith is uncut, it had the "12" higher rating, they have certain rules on things like headbutts etc in films for younger people like Star Wars, they used to be very strict even with adult rated films until a few years ago, when they changed the person in charge of the BBFC. so they are less strict now and most things now get through uncut, but certain things like animal creulty are still a big no-no and are still cut from films etc


LOL! So in the UK is it allowed to show crowds of people getting killed but not an idiot headbutt scene of just a second :S
.: Revenge of the Jedi 0.83 MS Edition :.
Author
Time
Basically yes it is ok to show crowds of people being blown away, it will be now usually just be given an uncut higher UK rating depending on what the level of violence, the rating is then based on the level, but it isnt ok to have a headbutt at a certain low UK rating it will be cut unless the distributor(Lucasfilm? Fox) take the higher rating offered by the BBFC another example is Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom that is cut over here in the UK because the distributor refused the higher rating and wanted a more audience friendly lower rating ,some distributors do that over here sometimes(very very rarely now thankfully) they are offered a uncut higher rating but go with the lower cut rating, this is why i import a lot of my discs to be certain,
Author
Time
Now, I don't know what anyone else thinks, but being in Canada, I get to watch a lot of American and European television and movies. I don't think that either has more censorship, but simply that it's in different areas. That doesn't make sense, but it will. It seems to me that American censors (based on what comes out) don't care as much about violence as they do about sexuality. Network television is all crime shows and murder and this, and they don't have a problem, but you don't see nudity (almost ever!). European censors, on the other hand, don't seem to blink at the sexuality, but come down hard on the violence.

Now, I'm not saying that the Americans don't care about violence or the Europeans about sex. It just seems that they're more desensitized to it. A little bit of violence gets a higher rating in Europe than in America, but a more sexually explicit film will get a higher rating in America than in Europe.

Maybe I'm wrong, but that's the impression I get.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: sybeman
Now, I don't know what anyone else thinks, but being in Canada, I get to watch a lot of American and European television and movies. I don't think that either has more censorship, but simply that it's in different areas. That doesn't make sense, but it will. It seems to me that American censors (based on what comes out) don't care as much about violence as they do about sexuality. Network television is all crime shows and murder and this, and they don't have a problem, but you don't see nudity (almost ever!). European censors, on the other hand, don't seem to blink at the sexuality, but come down hard on the violence.

Now, I'm not saying that the Americans don't care about violence or the Europeans about sex. It just seems that they're more desensitized to it. A little bit of violence gets a higher rating in Europe than in America, but a more sexually explicit film will get a higher rating in America than in Europe.

Maybe I'm wrong, but that's the impression I get.




Eyes wide shut is a small example in the US DVD nudity and sexual movements in certian scenes have been digitally censored, but the rest of the world "region" DVDs are the uncensored prints...
Author
Time
i would also rather watch sex over violence but you can still get hardcore porn on the internet regardless, as everyone well knows
Author
Time
I fear that Pat Robertson will stop that soon.

Although, he sems to have no problem with violence.
Author
Time
pat robertson sucks big hairy monkey cock. isnt he canadian why does he have any say in america anyways?